Why do mounted combat in Patch 1.6 feel rushed?

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:06 am

neither is magicka.

you can afaik use anything in your inventory on horseback.

But tbh I haven't tried lately. So far horses have been so weak I have even been ignoring Shadowmere so far..
Magicka regenerates though. But yes horses are too weak and too suicidal. It would have been better for them to stick Shadowmere as unkillable rather than quick health regen and if you're lucky a respawn at the pool.
User avatar
jesse villaneda
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:37 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:41 am

The horses don't have a patch on those in red dead which is a shame. I thought the horses in OB were far better and the mounted combat mod for them was great but oh well everything's forced 3rd now.

yep.

Bethesda has openly admitted that they drew inspirations from Red Dead Redemption. also, it could be in addition to this that they were trying to find a way to "hide" the slowdown and hiccups that are present on consoles when riding a horse. as lag is much more noticeable in first-person than in third-person.
User avatar
Nikki Lawrence
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 2:27 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 4:01 am

Magicka regenerates though. But yes horses are too weak and too suicidal. It would have been better for them to stick Shadowmere as unkillable rather than quick health regen and if you're lucky a respawn at the pool.
you can carry a butt load of potions too if you choose. or just don't do it. But if you're going to do mounted combat then blockng healing is pretty stupid at any rate. Since normal combat doesn't block healing yourself..
User avatar
Mark
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 11:59 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:07 am

There is not a single doubt in my mind that this game should have had a later release date. It's release was nothing short of a punch in the gut, and a kick in the nuts. Bethesda is great at making an open world, but game mechanics? Well, to put it simply, they svck at designing game mechanics.
User avatar
kirsty williams
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:56 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:50 am

There is not a single doubt in my mind that this game should have had a later release date. It's release was nothing short of a punch in the gut, and a kick in the nuts. Bethesda is great at making an open world, but game mechanics? Well, to put it simply, they svck at designing game mechanics.

I wouldn't go that far, because if it's game mechanics were as poorly designed as you're suggesting, Skyrim wouldn't still be on the most-played games on PSN, XBL and even Steam well into 7 months of it's lifespan.

no, I think Bethesda is just a bit too ambitious for their own sake (which they've openly admitted to), and sometimes bite off more than they can chew.
User avatar
Allison C
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:02 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:31 am

Little Sparrow,

You claim Bethesda is lazy and won't take an "estimated 6 hours" to make mounted combat perfect, yet you won't take a couple seconds to check any of your posts for grammar and spelling errors.

If Bethesda focused entirely on patches, everyone would complain harder about having no DLC. They are about to release a very large expansion to the game and you're complaining about free content.


Where did you study video game design?

Besides this forum post, have you ever created anything?


Everyone else, I do enjoy reading the constructive criticism about the new mechanics.
User avatar
Ice Fire
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:27 am

Post » Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:44 pm

yep.

Bethesda has openly admitted that they drew inspirations from Red Dead Redemption. also, it could be in addition to this that they were trying to find a way to "hide" the slowdown and hiccups that are present on consoles when riding a horse. as lag is much more noticeable in first-person than in third-person.
Although, it does highlight the poor draw distance a lot more.
User avatar
Charlie Sarson
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:00 am

Little Sparrow,

You claim Bethesda is lazy and won't take an "estimated 6 hours" to make mounted combat perfect, yet you won't take a couple seconds to check any of your posts for grammar and spelling errors.

If Bethesda focused entirely on patches, everyone would complain harder about having no DLC. They are about to release a very large expansion to the game and you're complaining about free content.


Where did you study video game design?

Besides this forum post, have you ever created anything?
Free content that probably should have been in the game. Especially if they hadn't forced themselves to stick to the 11.11.11 release date.
User avatar
Tracey Duncan
 
Posts: 3299
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:32 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:10 am

you can carry a butt load of potions too if you choose. or just don't do it. But if you're going to do mounted combat then blockng healing is pretty stupid at any rate. Since normal combat doesn't block healing yourself..
On horse back you can move more quickly away and now you can attack on them. Plus how would invisbility work on horseback? Or many of the higher level destruction spells?
User avatar
Eilidh Brian
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:45 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:41 am

I would rather a later release date over lots of bugs...wouldn't you?
Depends on what the bugs are. The bugs that were at release with Skyrim, were not that bad
User avatar
kitten maciver
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:36 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:07 am

Free content that probably should have been in the game. Especially if they hadn't forced themselves to stick to the 11.11.11 release date.

Maybe. Maybe they wanted to see what was needed and what wasn't from the vanilla game. Maybe the slow release of extra features coupled with bug fixes was part of the marketing strategy all along.

I think if a company set a deadline for a product to be finished well in advance, and they weren't organised well enough to produce that in time, you would see some heads rolling. All this amateur guesswork - they forced themselves to do X, they were lazy about Y, they didn't care about Z - is pretty pointless.
User avatar
An Lor
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:46 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:38 am

Little Sparrow,

You claim Bethesda is lazy and won't take an "estimated 6 hours" to make mounted combat perfect, yet you won't take a couple seconds to check any of your posts for grammar and spelling errors.

If Bethesda focused entirely on patches, everyone would complain harder about having no DLC. They are about to release a very large expansion to the game and you're complaining about free content.


Where did you study video game design?

Besides this forum post, have you ever created anything?


Everyone else, I do enjoy reading the constructive criticism about the new mechanics.

honestly, people will complain no matter what. why? because they're people.

even if this game was [censored] perfect, someone would still find some way to complain about something. it happens with literally every major release these days when relating to videogames. Uncharted 2 got the ridiculous "wait, this is an amazing game...but you can't forget that there's a plothole with that one guy who got thrown off the ledge at the beginning of the game!", it happened with Red Dead Redemption "yeah, great game. too bad horse riding is completely boring and repetitive!" and now it's happening with Skyrim.
User avatar
scorpion972
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:20 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:25 pm

I've never used horses in Skyrim, not even Shadowmere, even though I've stopped using Fast travel. They're stupid, clunky and useless and there's no first person. Mounted combat has not changed this, it merely makes it so killing certain creatures is slightly easier. Mages get really shafted for no apparent reason with this. (I am glad they added it for people who use it, but it's just not going to be used by me ever.)
User avatar
Erin S
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:06 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:29 am

I wouldn't go that far, because if it's game mechanics were as poorly designed as you're suggesting, Skyrim wouldn't still be on the most-played games on PSN, XBL and even Steam well into 7 months of it's lifespan.

no, I think Bethesda is just a bit too ambitious for their own sake (which they've openly admitted to), and sometimes bite off more than they can chew.
I agree with they bit off more than they could chew, but some mechanics, such as magic, are just plain and simple poorly done. I love the type of game Skyrim is, but some of it's mechanics drive me crazy by how poorly designed they were.
User avatar
Steeeph
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:28 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 7:14 am

Bows do, No first person? Also, Im not a mage.....But they could of least have gotten the range magic.
User avatar
Jeneene Hunte
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:18 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:45 am

On an unlreated note, when does mounted combat come to pc? Not the beta version
User avatar
Lil Miss
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:57 pm

Post » Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:41 pm

I agree with they bit off more than they could chew, but some mechanics, such as magic, are just plain and simple poorly done. I love the type of game Skyrim is, but some of it's mechanics drive me crazy by how poorly designed they were.

honestly, that's completely subjective. as I personally find the magic system in Skyrim to be among the best I've ever experienced in gaming thus far (definitely better than the system in place with Oblivion and Morrowind).
User avatar
ashleigh bryden
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:38 am

It does't feel rushed at all to me. It feels like something a guy who plays mostly melee characters made in a week which is pretty much what it is. Hey it's free why complain? I wish archery had a 1st person view and that I could use my magic from horseback but how can I really complain when they just gave this to me for nothing. To me that is just being ungrateful. I mean what do you really want for free? It is such a rare thing to get anything free these days with everyone charging for every little bit they offer up for a game. If you want something added to it then make a suggestion but complaining, saying it feels rushed, or that Bethesda is lazy as some people say just shows a serious lack of gratitude for something we simply don't see in the gaming world any more. I for one have appreciated all the content they have released thus far.
User avatar
Skivs
 
Posts: 3550
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:06 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:14 am

There is no first person view. How will I be able to use a bow without having first person view? Shooting in third person view, that's not me, at all.
Casting spells not possible in mounted combat? That's pretty weak for a big game developer like Bethesda.

Perhaps they should had waited with the mounted combat and put it in a DLC insted if that was the problem that it was going to be free.
I can see their conversation going on like this

"Hey dude, why don't we add first person view and let players be able to use Bound Bow or cast fire spells if they want when riding their horse?"
"No, are you insain?"
"What?"
"That would take at least 6 more working hours, we don't [censored] money!"
"Oh yeah, I forgot. This is a free update, of course!".

:( Oh yeah and when you draw your sword on the horse, the HUD goes away. Is it god mode combat? You don't need to watch your health?

Thanks bethesda for adding a new game feature thats never been done in an elder scrolls game before for free your definitly better then other developers who sell map packs and armor/weapon bundles for an arm and a leg!
User avatar
Victor Oropeza
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 4:23 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:41 am

On an unlreated note, when does mounted combat come to pc? Not the beta version
Stop writing on the forum and go play Skyrim ;) It's already out.
User avatar
Izzy Coleman
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:34 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:24 am

On an unlreated note, when does mounted combat come to pc? Not the beta version


It's live right now. Fire up your Steam and get some.


Damn ninjas! :ninja:
User avatar
Zach Hunter
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:26 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:26 pm

Horse riding should have first person view. It did not have it before 1.6 and it still does not have it after the fact. I would love a first person view for horses.

In saying that I think this is the beat patch so far on how many bugs it has fixed for me.

Now they need to do the weapon and shield clean ups and bound arrows.

Then they need to fix the briar hearts so they clean up and respawn properly.
User avatar
Kelly James
 
Posts: 3266
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:33 pm

Post » Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:19 pm

The thing is that no one sells patches, not even EA or Activision, but they still cost money to make. So the more a game is patched, the more it eats into the profits the game made. Modders only have to worry about how time they can use, and as such can fix a lot more a lot quicker.

And that's why I think that a pact between the Unofficial Skyrim Patch authors and Bethesda to merge and include the fixes in exchange for free DLC's or other stuff would be a win-win for everyone, console users included.

Right, Bethesda would still have to see if the bugs are really fixed, but they'd have already half of the work removed almost for free.
User avatar
I love YOu
 
Posts: 3505
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:05 pm

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 7:54 am

I've just tried the mounted combat out on the new patch and i think its great, it would annoy me when i had to dismount to kill wolves and bears etc, its a winner for me!!, nothing bad about it.
User avatar
K J S
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:50 am

Post » Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:56 am

And that's why I think that a pact between the Unofficial Skyrim Patch authors and Bethesda to merge and include the fixes in exchange for free DLC's or other stuff would be a win-win for everyone, console users included.

Right, Bethesda would still have to see if the bugs are really fixed, but they'd have already half of the work removed almost for free.

Great idea! but isn't it illegal to have someone work for a company for free?
User avatar
Stephy Beck
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:33 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim

cron