Due to the plethora of reviews giving Zelda SS perfect scores, I think it's pretty obvious that it will receive GoTY. I just can't see how these sites will be able to justify, however, giving a game like zelda (whose main concepts/characters/storylines/gameplay mechanics), that has been recycled since orcarina of time, a GoTY award. Not to mention that it looks like something I could catch on teletoon. Zelda is Nintendo's CoD: They pump the same game out every time, but it's worse cause it takes them 5 years between releases. Skyrim is superior to Zelda in every single way, and this is from an objective point of view. It's more mature, the combat is better and there are more combat options, there are more choices, the world is more open, the game is longer, there is more content, need I go on?
Super bummed guys. I think Nintendo paid many of these sites, or [censored] reviewed the game. I can see liking zelda if you grew up on it - because you loved it when you were six. I still love the Land before Time. Doesn't mean it should win awards over Jurassic Park.
From an objective point of view? Do you even know wtf that means?
Well, let's look at it this way....
You say Zelda is always a rehashed story, but would anyone here seriously call Skyrim's story award-winning? Fighting dragons isn't exactly an original idea, the factions don't really have original ideas either. Hell, I dunno how many people have beaten the main quest yet, but prepare to be disappointed. In that sense, I think Zelda would have to try pretty friggin' hard to have a worse story, and for some people, story IS everything. Every game is doomed to get boring with time, but a good story will last you a lifetime. Skyrim doesn't have such a story.
Maturity =/= better. You're basically saying Skyrim is better because you can decapitate people.
Combat being better is completely subjective. I haven't played this Zelda game, but if it's similar to Twilight Princess or any of the others, then Zelda combat would be half-brawling, half puzzles. Again, some people may prefer using thought to Skyrim's "click the mouse" combat.
If choices meant better, then Fallout New Vegas would be the one with the perfect 100 score, not Zelda nor Skyrim. That's not what happened though. :sadvaultboy:
As for the game being longer, having more content, etc etc etc, again, it depends on what people find most important in a game. If the story is more important to reviewers and Nintendo managed to make the story interesting despite rehashing it (which they DID manage with Majora's Mask and Wind Waker), then yeah, I think Skyrim is VERY lacking in the story department. If I were to rate Skyrim on story alone, I'd give it an abysmal score.