Hyperbole tends to breed hyperbole. Many people have played the game with few problems so its ridiculous to claim that Spike could only have nominated FONV because they were bribed and its impossible that they actually played it. It's equally silly to turn a blind eye to the problems.
Let's try to rein this discussion and keep it grounded rather than flying off on exaggerations in either direction.
You make some temperate points. However - I hope you don't suggest that bribes don't occur - of course they do, and they take place in many forms
That being said - I agree that the game has it's merits. And awarding it ancillary awards wouldn't really be an issue. However "RPG of the year"???? -- That award particularly sticks in my craw. (At least it didn't get a "Game of the Year" nomination!).
Let's use the car anology again. "RPG" of the year would be a subset of games, no? So, anologous to "Sports Car of the Year" or, "Sedan of the Year" or "Sport Utility of the Year".
To be awarded that comprehensive title - I'd think game playability and reliability would be key. And there is no arguing that this game, as released - doesn't have either for far far far far far far too many people.
Now, if you want to give a car that's had 3 recalls for performance related issues an "Interior Design Award of The Year" or "Sound System Design Award of the Year" - I don't see any inconsistencies.
Which is why I have no issue with the voice acting award. (Although personally I think Jennifer Hale as Commander Shepard in Mass Effect 2 should take that award - big time.)
But ANY award for "RPG of the Year" is an affront to the gaming community imo. (Again - Mass Effect 2 would be my choice. I had ONE tech issue with this game - was unable to save games at start - it was noticeable early and the fix was simply restarting the game. From then on - not one glitch.)