lets see, is there a backlash to the fact that bethesda won awards for skyrim whilst issues exist....yes, are there problems with the game, in particularly on the PS3...yes, Did they get comment from an award winning and well known Gaming Journalist in IGN UK's Keza Macdonald...yes
Seems the article has merit and is a true reflection of peoples views on the topic and is simply reporting on what is currently being discussed on multiple sites since the VGAs
You didnt offend me in any way, just found it unfunny and boring in its failed sarcasm...much like your friend request and profile message you left for me, all of which deleted if you hadnt noticed
Ok Let me try to give a balanced opinion based on the thread so far.
If there is a valid point about both the BBC article/ The IGN editorial.. it is the fact that (and I must say I actually agree with CockneyCharmer on this one.) Bethesda has not done a very good job in communicating.
A few examples: A soon as the PS3 problems appeared Bethesda could and imho should have chosen to immediately acknowledge this fact and communicate in the broadest manner possible.
Bethesda could learn a lot from some of their partners in the way patch release notes are written. Not only adress the issues, but also explain what caused them and in more detail.
Bethesda and with them a lot of other developers should use social media and press releases more often. While most problems are not prevalent for most users, a significant number of customers do have serious problems.. IE speak to them in a more open manner. Instead of using a Mod as intermediate to communicate... publish a statement by either Tod Howard or someone who actually speaks on behalf of the development/ patch team.
However..
I fully agree with other points made in this thread. One might even argue that there should be a difference between opinions and actually reporting about problems. Nobody is denying people the right to be angry. But.. members of this forum have as much right to complain about the way in which this anger is formulated.
Take this example by Uriel Nocturne:
^ This.
Just because they don't post it on the Forums every day, doesn't mean that they aren't reading everyone's hate-filled posts. They probably have kept quiet because they are having to sift through so many threads/posts that are mindless complaining without ever saying what is wrong, that it is hard to find a post that actually tells them what the issue is.
I'm not trying to say that people can't complain about a legitimate problem, it is the delivery of said complaint that is the issue I have.
"OHHH MY GAWDZ B3TH3SD@!!!!!!11!1!1!1 ReZ!STUNZES ARE BR0KENZ!!! FIXZEZ IT!!!!" Doesn't help Bethesda at all.
"The resistances seem to be affected negatively by the latest patch. Instead of a 50% reesistance to fire, the patch seems to have reversed said resistances so that my Dunmer has a 50% weakness to fire. Following is a short link to my testing video where I used a Flame Atronach as my subject and killed it with Fie spells." This type of complaint is like finding a gold vein in your back yard as far as developers are concerned.
It's ok to complain, but lets keep the delivery on the intelligent side.
Granted that the first example might be a bit exaggerated but otherwise.. I completely agree. Does that mean that I deny people to express their opinion or their disappointment.. No.. Do I wish that people would react more in this manner.. Yes.
Trying to balance a position or making arguments for a more balanced approach is perfectly legit.
In other words:
For every complainer repeating themselves there are wannabe mods and "Bethesda defense Force" people posting to say that shouldnt....swings and roundabouts.
Cause and effect.. You represent a certain point of view. People not only have the right to disagree with that, but react to that.. (and to repeated complaints)
In your opinion they're either part part of the BDF or wannabe mods.. In other words if they don't follow your line of thinking they are basically worthless. .. So "Sure Fine... Whatever"..
But who are you, amongst others, to say what is "mindless complaining" or not....if it was the moderators would be removing them.
Well because it is his oppinion, the fact that you don't agree doesn't disallow it for members to discuss "tone of voice". Moderators are there to guard the rules by which a forum is governed.. not to discuss the contents (if it stays within does borders).
However since a forum is basically a community, that community is allowed to make statements.