I loved Dead Money, just because it was unique. It doesn't have the same zest the second time around, but it was a step in the right direction for fun and unique DLCs.

So far, only four DLC's have been confirmed to be in development

If there is seriously 8 dlcs im just gonna let new vegas collect dust until the all inclusive disc comes out in 2 years >.>

At this point I just want Dead Money regardless of how bad it may be.

I thought that too, before actually playing the DLC. Don't get me wrong, it's a nice addition to the game, and a welcome change of scenery from the Mojave, but's it's definitely not something to hype too much about. I find it a little odd that they released this DLC first, since it's not exactly mind-blowing. However, they did the same thing in FO3 (Anchorage wasn't the best DLC either) but they more than made up for it with The Pitt and Point Lookout.

I mostly justvwant to play it to understand the stories in upcoming DLC.

youtube

Thought about it but I'd rather play it myself.

I'm gonna wait for the GOTY edition it will be worth the wait plus the PS3 and PC versions will likely come out mid year anyway. I'm gonna try and not watch them on youtube. Dead Money doesn't look interesting to me I hope the next one will be good.

Dude I played through Fallout 3 more times than I can remember but I cannot remember for the life of me who Desmond is .
Is he the dude worshipping an obelisk in an old office building in FO3?

He's the swearing ghoul with a nice mustache in Point Lookout.

Yeah I'm thinking it's 4 DLC's but we do have a while until Fallout 4 comes out so they could pump out an additional 3 DLC's after that. Me I'd just be happy if they did something like Point Lookout or even better something an expansion like The Shivering Isles.

The important thing is who will be in charge of doing the DLC's from Obsidian. Hopefully it's Swayer and Chris that's doing the work. If those two are in charge then expect the DLC's to be good although I hope the remaining DLC's aren't completely like Dead Money as that would get boring after a while.

I hope not.

80 euro? [censored] that noise.

If they are all 800 ms points, I will be very mad.

If they want to pump out that many DLC surely one of them will do something about the ending........even a mode where nothing changes, you simply keep your XP/items from the final battle.

Im gald there will be more content....but I do hope at least 1 DLC will add more content to just the current world....aka, making some of the quests (like taking back the prision, getting the slaon mine running again) have more impact on what is happening in the world. That was the only part of the game I was dissapointed with, the lack of impact some big quests actually had.

I don't really see what the problem with that is though, remember that 1 DLC cost around the same as going to the pictures. (Actually, going to the pictures cost more if one buys snacks and soda as well.)
So, a night at the pictures:1.30 hours of entertainment.
A DLC for Fallout:5-20 hours of entertainment. (Depending on how many times you replay it.)

So, say you buy 8 DLC's, all which gives you 6 hours of entertainment cause you only play through them once for some reason = 48 hours of entertainment.
If you go to the pictures 8 times then it will give you = around 12 hours of entertainment.

I'd say that a DLC is far more profitable and economic when considering the money:entertainment value ratio.

Remember you can't make out in the dark in the back row while playing DLC. Well yeah, maybe you can but I've yet to find a girl into FO DLC. :vaultboy:
Not that it's relevant to the subject, but I thought I'd throw it out there anyway.

My only issue with DLC costs is that I might end up paying the cost of the game all over again in DLC. If it's very well-made DLC that provides a significant playtime increase, I don't have a problem with it, but it feels a little weird to have to shell out like $50 for 5 DLCs when the aggregate content of those DLCs is nowhere near that of the $50 game.

That said, I'm a Fallout nut so I will eat up the DLC regardless. :fallout:

I don't mind the price as long as I enjoy the dlc.

iv been chatting to a buddy of mine about the dlcs after the first 4 he's under the impression that because the names of the dlcs was leaked thats why were are getting them at the same time. and the unnamed new ones will only be for the x box on timed release again. can anyone confirm this

no you cant make out while your playing but if your at home you can play the game and she can play with somthing eles lol

not gonna happen, nobody is dump 80 dollars into a dlcs for a game that has such a static map as it is, the base game and map area is barren almost, not one random event on the entire map, the same 3 bark scorpions at hidden valley every time you pass by, there's almost no reason to keep playing new vegas once the quests are done so a few people would prob buy 8 dlcs, but i doubt the majority of people who bought new vegas are gonna spend 70 more dollars just to have more stupid dlc's like dead money. they should take all that energy for the dlcs and finish the regular game first.

I do think they should work on getting some kind of random encounter and functionable leveled enemies into the game but the DLC's will be made anyway.
I think my movie vs DLC money:entertainment ratio example works pretty well.

Desmond is one of the best NPC's ever and I would love to see him again, and maybe as a companion as well :thumbsup:

bigcrazewolf

OH GOD!!!
HIT WITH A BRICK OF KNOWLEDGE, THANK YOU ANONYMOUS LEEKER!
"the source was said to have stated that the Courier has a "relationship" with Ulysses and that the nature of the relationship would surprise players. He also said that a future DLC would add an area to the game that players "likely thought they would never see", as well as "a personality [from] Fallout 3".
HO-HO-HO-HOLY [censored]!
*has just realized that James is dead and now feels like a complete idiot*
:ahhh: :ahhh: :ahhh: :ahhh: :ahhh:
It's going to be a good year...