Lets see. Azura wanted me to cleans her star of a necromancer. Peryite wanted me to kill one of his followers who betrayed him. Meridia wanted me to clear her shrine of shades and restore her light. Sheogorath wanted me to "fix" someones mind. Although he was playing with you in the process. Nocturnal wanted me to return her artifact after someone stole it. Really, I cant see any evil intent in their tasks. On the flip side, I have seen nothing to suppose the Aedra are "good". If anything, they are spiteful that their actions are influenced by mortals.
All the daedric princes you mentioned are technicly neutral, sometimes thier good, sometimes thier bad, which to me it still makes them evil, just because thier not as evil as some of the other daedric princes, doesnt make them not evil, for example if my PC in Skyrim killed innocent ppl, then turned around and helped out some ppl knowing theres a reward involved, does this make him good or evil? the answer is ovious. Azura may seem like a good daedra, but she really isnt she cursed an entire race of elves called the chimer, who looked pretty much like the high elves into the dunmer you see now, all because the Tribunal acended to godhood and stopped worshiping Azura, and Peryite this ones pretty easy, his quest involves killing one of his followers who betrayed him thats vengance and technicly evil, and Meridia is sort of vain and by restoring her light ur making her feel glorified, I already talked about Sheogorath so I will just skip him to Nocturnal, Nocturnal whom is the chosen daedric prince of the thieves guild inspires thievery which isnt very good in most cases.
How are the Aedra spiteful? because they bestow power to the dragonborn or the CoC instead of dealing with the problem themselves? the Aedra are connected to mundus but thier not OF mundus so they must act thru thier champions instead.