Not everyone who argues on this side of things does so in the most intelligent way ever (and this is no slight to the OP)

And besides, I'm the sort of person that takes over a person's argument if they aren't supporting it well enough, and especially so if I happen to agree with them to some point. Just because OP's argument isn't fleshed out doesn't mean it couldn't be. And thats where someone like me comes in.
[/color]
Yes, but those you will never satisfy are not the people you should be catering to. The system I came up would satisfy people on both sides of this argument, IE, the vast majority of people playing this game if not the full player base itself. Those that wouldn't be satisfied are of no relevance, because those sorts of people likely don't even want this kind of game, very much less the most ideal system for it.
[/color]
And there is no reason why your integrity cannot be maintained even among these changes. Again, my system provides a modern experience while still catering to both sides here. Feel free to read it here: http://www.gamesas.com/topic/1341740-my-idea-for-a-completely-overhauled-character-development-system/
And Beth would be more than capable of implementing such a system if they'd give it the proper focus. Apply this same line of thinking (meeting the best and deepest middle ground) to the rest of the game and you'll create something legendary.
[/color]
Look at this kid, pretending he's going to refute my argument because he's an exception to it.
[color=#A8A8A8]
So bud, how much weight can your argument hold if people are already actively and currently saying that they refute what you say because they ARE exceptions? that doesn't even make sense.

