even me?

Before you answer, remember, I have armor and a axe!

http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn234/titanmike357/Armor/PICT0120.jpg


http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn234/titanmike357/Armor/PICT0125.jpg

http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn234/titanmike357/Truck/PICT0075.jpg

Feel free to swoon over me, I can literately be a knight in shining armor, if you are taking about the 990-1066 era.

By hair pulling I mean ending up with a fistful of hair not attached to the head anymore. This was at my highschool, parties and the bar. Granted, at parties and the bar there are always fights, but the women always seem to be crazier than the men.

That reminds me, why are women so vicious? Broad generalizations coming up, you've been warned. When a girl hates another girl, it's on a whole other level than when a guy hates another guy. It is pure hate, not "man I'd like to kick his ass" more like "I want to kill her". I have never seen two guys get in a fight that was more brutal than two girls. Hell, guys in a fight where bottles are smashed over heads aren't as brutal as girls. With girls I've seen eye gouging, hair pulling, repeatedly smashing her face into the pavement, bloody scratch marks on the face. It's insane.

I'll keep mALX1's advice in mind.

That reminds me, why are women so vicious?

Sounds like you are in one of the "knife and gun" clubs, find a diff spot to troll for women, because what those girls are doing to eachother could very easily be turned on you one day, lol. (can you say, "Lorena Bobbit?" I thought you could!)

Women are the last defence of the young. They have to be capable of all out war when they feel that the child is threatened. That is where their capacity for full on violence comes from.

Women are the last defence of the young. They have to be capable of all out war when they feel that the child is threatened. That is where their capacity for full on violence comes from.

Women are the last defence of the young. They have to be capable of all out war when they feel that the child is threatened. That is where their capacity for full on violence comes from.

Hah! I could not care less about children. Puppies and comic books, on the other hand... :toughninja:

Sort of off topic here, but some guys who stayed in our hotel here yesterday found a box in the middle of the road (yes on the road) and it was all taped up. They stopped just to get it off the highway when they opened it up and found 3 kittens inside (they were alive).

If I knew who put that box there....you can't imagine what I would do to them. -_-

Women are the last defence of the young. They have to be capable of all out war when they feel that the child is threatened. That is where their capacity for full on violence comes from.

This.
Stuff on me I can let slide if I so wish.
Touch my children or my family and I will rip you to pieces.

Women are the last defence of the young. They have to be capable of all out war when they feel that the child is threatened. That is where their capacity for full on violence comes from.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MamaBear. ^_^

Bingo. No, a lot of the time it's not just the words that are being said. It's how she says things, what words she emphasises, the tone she's using...

Oooh, you mean like that god-awful "nothing" when she answers the question "what's wrong?" that makes you want to run a thousand miles away and another thousand miles under ground and hide under a hundred blankets but somehow the shock-wave of it would get you even then?

Combine that with a scary fox face. Like this: ^_^

:cold:


I'm off to buy meself a shovel and some blankets, c ya ppls.

Oooh, you mean like that god-awful "nothing" when she answers the question "what's wrong?" that makes you want to run a thousand miles away and another thousand miles under ground and hide under a hundred blankets but somehow the shock-wave of it would get you even then?

Nope. PSN really has no girls. All of the women you see in home are men pretending to be them for attention. It's true.

Really though, it's hard for me to explain what I find attractive, since every guy I've dated has looked completely different from the last, and I thought they were all attractive...

Hands are an indicator of hygiene, work ethic, and mood. Yes, I do check out men's hands. Are they clean? Well groomed? Restless? Tapping impatiently? Absently stroking a chin? Are they expressive? Clumsy? Uncalloused, soft, weak? Strong, nicely veined, well muscled?
I also don't want filthy hands in my sacred places.
My husband has beautiful hands, strong, well groomed, even with his calluses. His hands are quite capable of mixing concrete, using a nail gun, or caressing my shoulder.

Well duh. We all use the same labels. But the definition of that label is different for each person. For example - my number one criteria for what I find attractive in a man is humor. I am always drawn to men who can make me laugh (intentionally ). However, what I find humorous - may not be the same for another female. So the guy I find very attractive because he's amusing, relaxed, seems intelligent and confidant might be someone some other woman, with a different sense of humor (or no sense of humor) might find annoying and unattractive, or the independent streak I find a to be a requirement she would hate, because she's the type of woman who feels better if she and her boyfriend are sort of doing everything together as a couple, all the time.

So yeah, there is no pat answer to what do women find attractive. And also, just because you find someone attractive initially, because they meet some variable mental/physical "chemistry" criteria at first doesn't mean that as other qualities come out as you spend time with them, that the attraction will grow.

That's my point, these topics are redundant. Unless people go into details about specifics they just list a series of very general qualities. To people with less explorative and gifted minds they see these supposed "qualities" that "every" woman likes and tries to have those in himself. False information is spread around, and hearts are hurt on both sides. Very terrible, and that is why these threads are redundant. Too vague to really go into specifics and tell us what is really attractive on a specific level. Makes it look like women agree when they don't. Spreads false information all around, bad for a lot of people. This may lead to confusing ideas for both sixes, and leads to reinforcing stereotypical norms.

Too vague to really go into specifics and tell us what is really attractive on a specific level. Makes it look like women agree when they don't. Spreads false information all around, bad for a lot of people.

Too vague to really go into specifics and tell us what is really attractive on a specific level which makes it look like women agree when they don't, thus spreading lot of false information all around which is bad for a lot of people.