Oh I get it, sorry guys, I thought this thread was about something else. Apparently it's just another whose side is better, my side is better, thread.

:bolt:
I wouldn't like the thread to derail into that, I thought it was bout "which ending do you think will be best for the next game in terms of setting and story and why?"
IMO NCR is just boring now, yeah yeah they're landgrabbers and try to bring forth democracy but I just think they're bland now.
If they win then we likely get to see more of them being more boring in Vegas.
That's why I want Legion to win, they'll shake things up a bit with their culture and NCR will become more desperate in trying to hold control over their settlements which will likely make them a more strict society and hopefull darker.
If House wins then... Yay?
Legion is pushed back to Arizona and NCR is still feeding House with money.
Since House is rooted down in Vegas I don't see him making an appearance in the next game so I think it would be pointless for him to win.
And Yes Man?
NCR pushed back which might make them desperate and darker, which I like.
Legion is pushed back and have to regain their glory which means they will likely have struggles and make their story in Arizona more interesting, which I like.
And Yes Man starts up a robot army who tries to take over the world, which I kinda like while it's a cliché.
What I don't like about it is the general idea of setting everyone back, instead of humanity progressing they're mostly set back to anarchy again.
Since FO3 was anarchy on a disc I've had enough of it and want progress, not setbacks.
Anyway, it's not about who's better, it's about which of these four will give us the best storyline for the next game.
I consider it Legion, there is so much potential with them that it'd be a shame to just push them off to the side.
If not Legion then Yes Man solely for a robot army which might make Pulse weapons more useful.