and now the wait begins for PC..

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:04 pm

I just wish Bethesda would communicate with us a little bit as to what's going on with PC and PS3 versions. It's pretty weird to see them bending over backwards to act like they don't exist, and brush off or dodge any questions about the subject. I'm no expert on PR, but when you have a bunch of people dead set on giving you their money and begging to know when they will have the chance, it seems like it would very wise to take them seriously. They are in a position that just about any business would be jealous of, and I don't think it's in anyone's interest to take that for granted.
User avatar
Robyn Howlett
 
Posts: 3332
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:01 pm

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:49 pm

I just wish Bethesda would communicate with us a little bit as to what's going on with PC and PS3 versions. It's pretty weird to see them bending over backwards to act like they don't exist, and brush off or dodge any questions about the subject.
As I stated already they aren't allowed to talk about the PC or PS3 versions until after the thirty days are up. That is how exclusivity contracts with Microsoft work.
User avatar
gary lee
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:48 am

You get it earlier because the slimiest nastiest sleaziest suit in the video game industry paid Bethesda for temporary exclusivity. Just like they paid EA/Bioware for the Mass Effect DLC to come out on 360 first. It's a dirty move, and is just one of the many reasons why Microsoft is the cancer that is killing the video games industry.

Let's not forget that the PC version of Dawnguard entered beta first. This is not a thing of it being READY for the 360 first. This is marketing bullcrap, engineered by suits over at Microsoft. I can't blame Bethesda for taking the money, but I can blame Microsoft for being the cancer offering it and pulling these stunts. PC tended to get patches first because they were ready first on PC, and it was easier to hotfix a problem found on the PC version than either console version, often if PC players "guinea pig"'ed a patch they found bugs that were fixed by the time the patch went live for consoles.
Money talks, and pc and ps3 were silent, end of story.
User avatar
Stacyia
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:48 am

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:12 pm

Its all money driven for certain. I gotta say though, on PC i for one wont complain too much. We have mods. Just my 2 cents.
User avatar
James Hate
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:05 am

Money talks, and pc and ps3 were silent, end of story.

"PC" isn't represented by any 1 corporation, and that tactic Microsoft uses to limit competition is underhanded and dirty, just like Don Mattrick's rat looking face.
User avatar
James Baldwin
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:11 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:01 am

"PC" isn't represented by any 1 corporation, and that tactic Microsoft uses to limit competition is underhanded and dirty, just like Don Mattrick's rat looking face.
Nice guys finish last, money talks, its how the world works, get over it. And Im sure steam could do a exclusivity deal, and PS3 could too, but they sat on their hands and did nothing, so blame them for dropping the ball.
User avatar
Haley Cooper
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:30 am

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:28 pm

Its all money driven for certain. I gotta say though, on PC i for one wont complain too much. We have mods. Just my 2 cents.

Yeah, we have mods, but the reason we have mods and the 360 doesn't have mods, is not due to a rat faced sleazeball suit bribing Bethesda to not make those mods available on the consoles. It's technical limitations, possible stability issues, and the fact that Microsoft won't allow user made content free of charge over xbox live.
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:48 am

Nice guys finish last, money talks, its how the world works, get over it. And Im sure steam could do a exclusivity deal, and PS3 could too, but they sat on their hands and did nothing, so blame them for dropping the ball.

I'll bet you think that EA's tactic of buying studios and then laying everyone off to eliminate competition is also a good move too, rather than an industry ruining load of crap that it is.
User avatar
Sebrina Johnstone
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:58 pm

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:24 pm

I'll bet you think that EA's tactic of buying studios and then laying everyone off to eliminate competition is also a good move too, rather than an industry ruining load of crap that it is.
You're ignorance is astounding, that is just bad business, because in the long term creativity is sacrificed and games end up being rushed, what MS did is REALLY good business, guaranteed people would buy the game for their platform mostly. NOTHING was stopping Sony or steam from doing the same, nothing, they were just dragging their heels and being cheap, nothing else to it, also, with what EA does, they end up losing customers over time because the quality of the product is sacrificed. You obviously have zero understanding of the business world. And arguing with someone like you that is obviously just butt hurt is pointless, ciao.
User avatar
Rachel Eloise Getoutofmyface
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:20 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:13 am

Money talks, and pc and ps3 were silent, end of story.

Are you saying that Bethesda made an offer to release the DLC on time only for platforms whose owners paid them, and Sony and "The PC" (whoever that is supposed to mean) just didn't want to pay? I don't think that's how these sorts of deals work. Pretty sure Microsoft gave them a deal that explicitly excluded the other platforms and there was nothing anyone else could do once the agreement was made. That's the nature of "exclusivity". It's not like Microsoft made a deal because they care about Xbox users more than Sony cares about PS3 users or whatever, like I've heard people claiming in discussions like this. The purpose of the deal was to undercut the other platforms by intentionally inconveniencing their users. It's not like it's evil or particularly uncommon, but let's call it what it is. Microsoft didn't pay to give Xbox users an early release, they paid to give PC and PS3 users a late one.
User avatar
adam holden
 
Posts: 3339
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:42 am

Here's hoping that Windows 8 is a flop and Microsoft have to close down their XBox division.
User avatar
KiiSsez jdgaf Benzler
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:10 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:03 am

I think they should just made it $10 more for a month on ps3 and pc that way everyone would get to play it and bethesda would make a ton of money
User avatar
Stu Clarke
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:45 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:25 am

I just find it ironic that Microsoft want exclusive when Skyrim is a Games for (Microsoft) Windows.
User avatar
Kortknee Bell
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:05 pm

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:30 pm

I just find it ironic that Microsoft want exclusive when Skyrim is a Games for (Microsoft) Windows.

They want you to buy their noisey, high failure rate, overheating paper weight, and pay for their premium online service filled with advertisemants, and buy their gimmicky, overpriced camera and microphone addon.
User avatar
Jennifer Munroe
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:57 am

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:00 pm

I just find it ironic that Microsoft want exclusive when Skyrim is a Games for (Microsoft) Windows.

Ah, but it isn't Games for Windows Live - that might have made a difference. Fallout 3 was a Games for Windows Live title, and it got DLC at the same time as the 360 versions, IIRC. New Vegas and Skyrim are not Games for Windows Live titles, but rather Steamworks titles - and they got delayed DLC (1 DLC in the case of New Vegas, 2 in the case of Skyrim).
User avatar
Antony Holdsworth
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 4:50 am

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:11 pm

They want you to buy their noisey, high failure rate, overheating paper weight, and pay for their premium online service filled with advertisemants, and buy their gimmicky, overpriced camera and microphone addon.

:biggrin:
User avatar
Kelli Wolfe
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:09 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:27 am

The purpose of the deal was to undercut the other platforms by intentionally inconveniencing their users. It's not like it's evil or particularly uncommon, but let's call it what it is. Microsoft didn't pay to give Xbox users an early release, they paid to give PC and PS3 users a late one.

Thankyou for your measured commentary. Waiting doesn't bother me - I was however taken aback to read Beth cannot even disclose release dates for other platforms within the 30 day period. With no confirmed date to look forward to, for their sake I hope I and a bunch of other people don't simply forget about this altogether.
User avatar
Schel[Anne]FTL
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:53 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:36 am

I was however taken aback to read Beth cannot even disclose release dates for other platforms within the 30 day period. With no confirmed date to look forward to, for their sake I hope I and a bunch of other people don't simply forget about this altogether.

To be fair, that much is still speculation. It's possible that Bethesda is able to discuss release info for other platforms now that it's out on Xbox; it's only been a day, they might have just not gotten much of a chance yet. Here's hoping that's the case, but I'm not holding my breath.
User avatar
Craig Martin
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:25 pm

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:41 pm

To be honest it's the direction our society is going that is to blame for the fury. We see something we want and we want it now. We don't want to wait. The same exact fury would be happening if it was the PC who got it first and XBox players had to wait.

One thing Bethesda could do to quell some of the fury is let the other platforms know when they can expect the DLC. So far it feels as if they don't care about the PS3 & PC community. A lot of PC players have been loyal to the company since the franchise started and feel that loyalty means nothing. All we want is an official time table from Bethesda. :smile: Will it be released in 30 days or will it be longer.

To be honest after they released the construction kit the feeling of not caring what the other does became mutual between myself and Bethesda. Let them release dawnguard for PC in 3 months for all I care because at the end of the day I am still running close to 60 mods that cost me absolutely nothing.

You're ignorance is astounding, that is just bad business, because in the long term creativity is sacrificed and games end up being rushed, what MS did is REALLY good business, guaranteed people would buy the game for their platform mostly. NOTHING was stopping Sony or steam from doing the same, nothing, they were just dragging their heels and being cheap, nothing else to it, also, with what EA does, they end up losing customers over time because the quality of the product is sacrificed. You obviously have zero understanding of the business world. And arguing with someone like you that is obviously just butt hurt is pointless, ciao.

Actually all that reveals is how far the intelligence of the average human has fallen in the last several decades.
User avatar
Josh Dagreat
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:07 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:17 am

To be fair, that much is still speculation. It's possible that Bethesda is able to discuss release info for other platforms now that it's out on Xbox; it's only been a day, they might have just not gotten much of a chance yet. Here's hoping that's the case, but I'm not holding my breath.

Speculative but entirely feasible.

The iron is hot: they strike or they don't.
User avatar
Project
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:38 pm

And I hope your right. It doesn't change the fact that Beth hasn't given a timeframe for release, and that it's factually inaccurate to say that DG is definitely coming out in a month for PC. We just know it's going to be AT LEAST a month. And there's a huge difference.

Maybe I've just been following GW2 too much, but the fact that we don't know for sure it's coming out in late July for PC tells me it's going to be a while. That seems like something they'd want to say to reassure PC fans. Also: Does anyone know if there's going to be a beta period for PC? I'd imagine there will be, which is part of why I'm not particularly hopeful for July.

It'll be out in 30 days. Money talks and there are a lot of people that play on the PC ready to spend $20.00 to play Dawnguard.
User avatar
JUan Martinez
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:12 am

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:39 pm

It's only 30 days, we should be able to survive.
User avatar
jessica Villacis
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:03 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:32 am

It'll be out in 30 days. Money talks and there are a lot of people that play on the PC ready to spend $20.00 to play Dawnguard.

Yeah, i can't see them waiting longer due to the popularity of the game and if they do then they'll do nothing but hurt themselves.
User avatar
Monika
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:50 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:22 am

Yeah, i can't see them waiting longer due to the popularity of the game and if they do then they'll do nothing but hurt themselves.

I'd have the PS3 and PC versions ready to go the minute the exclusive deal is over. Then I'd sit back and watch the cash flow in, like they did today!
User avatar
Laura Hicks
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:39 pm

It'll be out in 30 days. Money talks and there are a lot of people that play on the PC ready to spend $20.00 to play Dawnguard.

The only kind of money talking all this makes me want to do though is busting slimeball in the mouth with a sock filled with quarters. That'd shut him up from his "Better with Kinect?" speeches for awhile (that he always claps after saying, seriously, clapping to a crowd after your own statements is just sleazy).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D0_Cj1xxDo
User avatar
[ becca ]
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:59 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim