Are people not buying this game just because of Steam?

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:35 pm

Some people are just resistant to change. When the old LP vinyl music albums were being retired from store shelves, people came up with all kinds of excuses why vinyl was somehow better and more authentic. Then people didn't want to give up their cassette players, because they had so many music cassettes. Music CDs are now rapidly becoming outdated as iPods and MP3 players are the norm for music.

Games and services like Steam are no different. People just are having a hard time coping with the fact that a physical CD is no longer necessary or even that efficient. As more people gain access to high-speed internet, digital distribution will become the norm.
User avatar
Scarlet Devil
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:31 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:16 pm

Well whatever happens Steam is here to stay. It's the least intrusive "DRM" there is out there at the moment, and I find having chat, the ability to browse the web ingame, being able to take screenshots and easily upload them to your own online gallery, automatic updates, the ability to play without a disk and achievements a fair trade off for the one time internet activation.
User avatar
Suzy Santana
 
Posts: 3572
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:02 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:54 am

Youre right the pattern is there. They are all trying to put music from and external HD or network on to their internal drives without bringing over the itunes .pref file and then adding the folder to their itunes library.
Like you stated, its people not knowing how to use computers. Its not itunes, its them. Or in this case, you. I can help you fix this if it ever happens again. Its really easy. Bummer it happened to you as its the first time i've ever read about it. You can avoid all this as well by using migration assistant to transfer music from external sources to internal ones.
Since I use my rig for audio production i go get weird hiccups and bugs from time to time. I use carbon copy cloner to make a image of my system just in case something stupid like this happens. I highly recommend it.

One of those is a kid trying to steal music on the school network and cant figure it out, so that one doesnt apply.
So much for Macs being easier than using a Windows PC. You know what I do to put music from an external HDD to my internal HDD? I plug in the external HDD, I open the external drive, I hit ctrl + a (shortcut for select all), ctrl + c (shotcut for copy), then I go to the relevant directory and hit ctrl + v (shortcut for paste). Then I can open whatever media player I care for and ask it to scan for new music in the library.

By the way, it will be a freezing day in hell before I let iTunes manage anything for me on any system that I care to actually work on. I don't want to copy various preference files from this or that media player to avoid the player deleting files and I don't want to use some "migration assistant". Either the application can figure out what I want to do on its own or it's a pile of garbage made by idiot programmers who think the users are there to use their applications rather than the other way around, that they're there to make applications for the users.

Then again, such a sentiment would be classic Apple, wouldn't it? So many Apple-bots would use any product released by Apple and insist that it's the best and most user friendly ever, even if it consistently kicks them in the balls during use. Granted, I don't like Apple. I don't like Jobs. I don't like their design much, and I really don't like Chinese workers committing suicide at the factory that produces iPhones at what, less than 20 bucks a piece, while Apple are easily selling them for ten times that amount. I also don't like MacBooks costing $100 more than the worth of their hardware solely because there's a partially-eaten fruit. Generally, I'd say that I'm very biased against Apple products. This bias may show in the above.

Oh, and
:D
User avatar
jodie
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:42 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:45 am

I was about to applaud them for that, recalling that Fallout 3 worked the same way, and that I really liked and appreciated their decision.
~But with FO3 it was apparently a mistake; and one they seemingly made twice, having also made it with Skyrim. That follow up patch tactic is evil IMO. I now wish that I had bought Skyrim, installed, activated it, and then uninstalled Steam and never patched it.

But there is a drawback to this, as that is close to what I have. I still run version 1.1.21.0, but I won't be able to update unless I turned on Steam. For now, I am not going to be using Steam until I can figure out an option that I can be comfortable about. So yes, I can play Skyrim without Steam or the Internet; it leaves me stuck at launch day waiting for a patch that really has fixed most of the bugs and/or quest items. Until then, I have to play knowing I am going to have broken quests and other things misbehaving.
User avatar
Nick Jase Mason
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:23 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:44 pm

I've seen lots of posts on this forum saying how they absolutely despise Steam, and that they refuse to buy the game because of Steam?

Honestly, why? It looks like people think Valve will sell your personal info (lol). I dunno, maybe I'm missing the point. In any case, why do you hate Steam, if you do? Has it prevented you from buying Skyrim?

Its not that I hate Steam..
I hate having to register for stuff... putting my personal info out there.. I've had stalkers, 1 real life ex, and random person who showed up at my house(who knew me from internet) and internet stalkers... Don't forget all hacking thats been the "in" thing.

There is just no trust.

I bought Ps3 copy of Skyrim (with plans to pick up PC version just for CK (since chance of mods for console seemed like a good chance)

If i had read box case at Best Buy and saw that it required "online" to play/register via steam) I would not have bought PC version at all. My Gaming PC is Offline only.

I have no love or hate for Steam.. I just hate being forced to do stuff. >_<
User avatar
Rebecca Dosch
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:39 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:35 am

Steam aggregates data, its not optional. What other need is there for Steam?

Distribution of media?

Garbage.

There is no standard of practice across the industry either. You can still buy hard copies, and indeed the console market is the largest share so if ANYTHING Steam is the standard of the PC minority.

So, you're telling me, that if I want to go play Skyrim on some other computer I have to sign in to an account that is in someway tied to my finances. This by itself is hazardous enough.

Steam does absolutely ZERO, NOTHING, NOT A DAMN THING TO STOP PIRACY. It doesn't, doesn't, doesn't even slow down the process. Skyrim was out weeks before the game even freaking launched.

Steam will be the downfall of PC gaming, I don't care if you like it or not. So be content with your convenience, its awful nice for people that don't know how to operate a computer.

Aggregate data is not an invasion of privacy though and it doesn't come from anything outside of Steam itself (i.e. How many people on Steam are playing a game at a given time).

Hard copies of games, even on consoles, all have End User Licence Agreements. These are pretty much standard on the concept that you have a licence for the software. You agree to it by opening the shrinkwrap (console games) or clicking "I Agree" on PC games. How valid are they? That's up for debate. But a EULA for a game on Steam is no different to EULAs for non-Steam PC titles or console games in this regard.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "sign in to an account that is in someway tied to my finances. This by itself is hazardous enough." If you bought Skyrim at retail or your bank has paid Valve, if bought through Steam, then the purchase is complete and you can play the game simply by logging into Steam, be it on your own PC or a friend's.

As I said earlier, DRM is only one aspect of Steam. Now, if someone is absolutely determined to pirate a game they will, DRM only prevent casual piracy (the I'll burn a copy for my mate kind) but there's evidence that Steam has proven to be a reliable alternative to pirated copies in some territories.

Lastly, I know how to operate a computer. I also like convenience. I like convenience when it works well, which Steam does. I can go to a game's site and download a patch and install it. It's not hard. But it's more convenient when Steam does it for me. I log into Steam, it download's the update and it's done.
User avatar
amhain
 
Posts: 3506
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:31 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:18 pm

Some people are just resistant to change. When the old LP vinyl music albums were being retired from store shelves, people came up with all kinds of excuses why vinyl was somehow better and more authentic. Then people didn't want to give up their cassette players, because they had so many music cassettes. Music CDs are now rapidly becoming outdated as iPods and MP3 players are the norm for music.

Games and services like Steam are no different. People just are having a hard time coping with the fact that a physical CD is no longer necessary or even that efficient. As more people gain access to high-speed internet, digital distribution will become the norm.

It actually has very little to do with that, and quite honestly... we will never move past physical mediums.

Mp3 has been out for over a decade, and yet CD's and other mediums are no less relevant. Indeed Vinyl and other older formats are making somewhat of a comeback as slightly more than a niche market.

People are resistant to the idea that they cannot own something they paid for, and indeed there are MANY instances of electronic media that people do own... or are at least free to operate with no strings attached. When you have a physical copy of software, with no strings attached, regardless of the EULA... you OWN that particular piece of software and are free to do with what you wish. Abide by the EULA or not. Steam reminds me of having a cop in your car just to make sure you don't exceed 1/4th a mph over the speed limit.

In truth, Steam has very little to do with piracy or ease of use. Its more akin to monopolizing distribution and cutting out middlemen to force people to buy an overpriced product.

I can't exactly reference certain sites here, but you would absolutely be surprised by the surge in activity at the sites that Steam is supposed to be cutting out. I would estimate that new users for this specific piece of software, Skyrim, has probably doubled or even tripled just because of Steam. Though I've only read comments in other forums in passing, so wouldn't exactly know directly.

I, personally, associate Steam with recent initiatives like COICA/SOPA/OPEN/PIPA... or data mining that reminds me of Google or Facebook (There is a Google Tracker on this very site) ... or iTunes and the way it functions.

That is why I don't like and will never use Steam, and will never buy a product from Bethesda for PC. Keep your mods, I'll keep my privacy.
User avatar
No Name
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:30 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:10 pm

Best thing I've heard all month... not that the month has really got going yet, but I imagine it'll still be the best for some time yet!



Don't you dare treat this as a boolean issue. This isn't a matter of hating change, but a matter of hating the direction the change is taking. It is going the wrong damned way. We should be freeing ourselves from the pointless, paranoid, cultural shackles of the past going forwards.... but instead society is just becoming more paranoid, more closeted, arbitrarily screwing itself over more and more with each passing year.

sounds to me you are pretty freaked-out and paranoid. Online is the way the world is moving. There's no future in resisting it; and there are many benefits (and dangers). Accept and adapt. I have had no problems with online gaming (other than the poor quality of my local internet connection).
User avatar
Chrissie Pillinger
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 3:26 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 1:39 pm

You CHOSE steam beacuse you CHOSE to buy skyrim. If you dident WANT steam, you shouldent have bought skyrim. Now they are going to go, "Well they all bought it even with steam last time, guess it wont hurt if we do it again."

I wrote a similar post about this issue a few minutes ago Warrior. Some of us Chose to buy Skyrim and knew we had 'use' Steam to activate it. The complaints are now that we have purchased the game, followed the rules, installed Steam, activate our games; a Ninja patch comes along and changes our systems to making it a 'requirement' to have Steam installed and running.

We chose the game, and chose to accept the terms on the box for activation. We played the game for a week or so and all was fine. It was when the whole Steam/gamesas Ninja patch a week or so later that screwed how we play our game from the original day we bought, to now.

There was no CHOICE in that requirement.
User avatar
Caroline flitcroft
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:05 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:15 am

So much for Macs being easier than using a Windows PC. You know what I do to put music from an external HDD to my internal HDD? I plug in the external HDD, I open the external drive, I hit ctrl + a (shortcut for select all), ctrl + c (shotcut for copy), then I go to the relevant directory and hit ctrl + v (shortcut for paste). Then I can open whatever media player I care for and ask it to scan for new music in the library.

By the way, it will be a freezing day in hell before I let iTunes manage anything for me on any system that I care to actually work on. I don't want to copy various preference files from this or that media player to avoid the player deleting files and I don't want to use some "migration assistant". Either the application can figure out what I want to do on its own or it's a pile of garbage made by idiot programmers who think the users are there to use their applications rather than the other way around, that they're there to make applications for the users.

Then again, such a sentiment would be classic Apple, wouldn't it? So many Apple-bots would use any product released by Apple and insist that it's the best and most user friendly ever, even if it consistently kicks them in the balls during use. Granted, I don't like Apple. I don't like Jobs. I don't like their design much, and I really don't like Chinese workers committing suicide at the factory that produces iPhones at what, less than 20 bucks a piece, while Apple are easily selling them for ten times that amount. I also don't like MacBooks costing $100 more than the worth of their hardware solely because there's a partially-eaten fruit. Generally, I'd say that I'm very biased against Apple products. This bias may show in the above.

Oh, and
:biggrin:

What are you talking about? Thats exactly how you do a copy on any computer mac or pc. The problem with the people in the forums that I was addressing was the setting of itunes being messed up and how you can keep your itunes library with the same organization. A .pref file is infiniatley easier to copy then re tagging your MP3s for those of us who like our computer jukebox to stay organized in a particular fashion.
Those forums i was addressing were also trying to steal music off networks. If you are trying to run apple software on a pc, then you should really re think what computer or what software you are using.
User avatar
Red Bevinz
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 7:25 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 9:28 am

Skyrim is Steams highest selling game, so yeah I guess sales for Skyrim are really bad.
User avatar
Nick Tyler
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:57 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:51 am

Some people are just resistant to change. When the old LP vinyl music albums were being retired from store shelves, people came up with all kinds of excuses why vinyl was somehow better and more authentic. Then people didn't want to give up their cassette players, because they had so many music cassettes. Music CDs are now rapidly becoming outdated as iPods and MP3 players are the norm for music.

Games and services like Steam are no different. People just are having a hard time coping with the fact that a physical CD is no longer necessary or even that efficient. As more people gain access to high-speed internet, digital distribution will become the norm.

This is it. Sensible and simple.
User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:56 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 9:05 am

Some people are just resistant to change. When the old LP vinyl music albums were being retired from store shelves, people came up with all kinds of excuses why vinyl was somehow better and more authentic. Then people didn't want to give up their cassette players, because they had so many music cassettes. Music CDs are now rapidly becoming outdated as iPods and MP3 players are the norm for music.

Games and services like Steam are no different. People just are having a hard time coping with the fact that a physical CD is no longer necessary or even that efficient. As more people gain access to high-speed internet, digital distribution will become the norm.

When digital distribution becomes the norm I'll stop gaming and just play what I have now. When I buy something I want a physical copy, especially when it comes to my games.
User avatar
Rhysa Hughes
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:00 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 9:51 pm

That is why I don't like and will never use Steam, and will never buy a product from Bethesda for PC. Keep your mods, I'll keep my privacy.
The way you described Google, Facebook, iTunes and Steam as all "data mining", makes it seem like paranoia as opposed to genuine concerns. There are no privacy concerns with Steam. Ignoring hacking, keyloggers and stuff as that is possible for anything you do on the internet. The only information they have of mine is my name, date of birth and email address. That's less information than my local library have about me.
User avatar
Ebou Suso
 
Posts: 3604
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 5:28 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:40 pm

Digital Distribution IS the norm now.
User avatar
Russell Davies
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:01 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:53 pm

I have not had any issues using Steam. In fact I like not having to put a disk in and not having to check for upgrades. Look, there has to be something to reduce piracy and so far Steam seems to be the best option.
User avatar
Jack Moves
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:48 pm

Some people are just resistant to change. When the old LP vinyl music albums were being retired from store shelves, people came up with all kinds of excuses why vinyl was somehow better and more authentic. Then people didn't want to give up their cassette players, because they had so many music cassettes. Music CDs are now rapidly becoming outdated as iPods and MP3 players are the norm for music. Games and services like Steam are no different. People just are having a hard time coping with the fact that a physical CD is no longer necessary or even that efficient. As more people gain access to high-speed internet, digital distribution will become the norm.
Nothing I say will make you change your mind or be the least bit critical of the quality of service you're receiving, but there are two things you said, which are factually dead wrong.
1) Music CDs do have a higher quality than MP3 files. MP3 is a lossy format, which is why an album is smaller when converted to MP3 than when you keep the raw wave file. What this means is that some sound details are skipped in order to make the files have a much more convenient size. Effectively, anything below 192 kbps quality is complete garbage that is almost painful to listen to on anything but the most cheap speakers you can dig up. 192 is tolerable with most PC speakers but you really need 256 kbps for it to not sound garbled every now and again, at least with any kind of remotely decent speakers. And the better speakers you have, the better quality you need.

2) I don't care how fast your internet is, because it's not likely to be faster than my DVD rom drive (20x read for up to 27 mb/s or ~220 mbit/s) and it's certainly not faster than my SATA HDD (up to 150 mb/s or 1.2 gbit/s). And mind you, this is a fairly old HDD. Modern SATA drives are twice as fast and it gets even more fun once SSD goes mainstream. If you think your high speed internet is more efficient than my HDD image then you're having a laugh. :)
User avatar
Danger Mouse
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:55 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:09 pm

By the way Steam doesn't take your info unless you go to the settings and set it to do that.

Have you even used Steam before? and hell its just hardware info anyway, do you complain about fluoride in the water to?
User avatar
Jessie Rae Brouillette
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:50 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:35 am

This is where a lot of people are getting confused. The Ninja patch changed the way the program runs from what some of us bought the game as. We bought the game only needing to 'activate' it through Steam. When that Ninja patch came out and you accidently ran Steam or you went to Steam for something minor, you got the patch whether you wanted it or not. This crippled the game to where you now HAVE TO run Steam to play the game. I call it a 'Bait & Switch'.

If the game would have been published with requirements to have Steam and the Internet to play, then the complaints would be unwarranted as it was a known item before purchasing. However, if some of us have purchased the game knowing full well (and the retail box confirms this) that Steam was needed only for 'activation', this is why some of us are mad. We bought knowing one thing, Activation Needed, but a lot of players were caught off guard when their systems were hijacked by the Ninja patch that broke the existing playability of the game.

Remember, that Ninja patch did not fix anything; it only change the way the game was able to play. You buy the game with a certain set of requirements, you meet them, you play the game, you are having fun; then the Ninja patch broke that for no reason.

So this whole notion of playing offline etc...., this was not part of the original purchase. The original purchase was for activation and that is what some of us expected. We did not approve of some 3rd party software to install on their own a patch that breaks our game play.
According to the box I purchased the original condition was acceptance of the Steam Subscriber Agreement.
Initially I wasnt happy about it either...but I quickly realised it is the way Bethesda has chosen to market their game...I want to play the game...so I have accepted and adapted to it.

So far I am very happy with the game...and I have had no issues with Steam.

So in my view people need to just get over this issue and move on. it's pointless [censored]ing about it endlessly. Digital distribution is the future.
User avatar
Craig Martin
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:25 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:38 pm

When digital distribution becomes the norm I'll stop gaming and just play what I have now. When I buy something I want a physical copy, especially when it comes to my games.

Physical copies are going nowhere, there isn't enough bandwith in the world for an entirely digital age.

Just mindless lipservice for a police product some people are satisfied with, and stating that Skyrim is Steam's top selling game is in no way an indicator of acceptance of Steam. People that don't have Steam didn't buy the game... Correlate that with the amount of Skyrim copies purchased for consoles. Then try and estimate how many people broke rank and played it their own way.

Where does Steam sit now? Thought so...

I would contend that the new age of non-privacy is becoming the norm, and perhaps when they have to sign into Steam just to watch The Kardashians or The Jersery Shore... only then will people begin to see the problem.
User avatar
JD FROM HELL
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:54 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:37 pm

Lastly, I know how to operate a computer. I also like convenience. I like convenience when it works well, which Steam does. I can go to a game's site and download a patch and install it. It's not hard. But it's more convenient when Steam does it for me. I log into Steam, it download's the update and it's done.
Convenience at the price of user choice. Steam will always update to latest version regardless of whether that version is complete garbage or not. It won't let you upgrade to any other version. What this means is that if you're using SKSE then you have to wait for a few days or change your mod list, simply because a new patch was released. If you update manually then you can keep playing and update at your convenience.

It's also convenient to buy your fruits and vegetables online, but it happens at the cost of someone else selecting what you're getting. I have a really comfortable recliner but it's not so comfortable that I care to eat rotten tomatoes or spongy carrots. :D
User avatar
lydia nekongo
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:04 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:02 pm

Steam is good while it works but its a real pain when something goes wrong or you purchase the wrong game or just anything happens that isnt of the norm. Steam support is the worst I've ever seen. No phone support, 5-10 day support ticket responses, they refuse to aid with absolutely anything that you may have a problem with, accounts can be locked/banned and you lose everything just because someone over there says so, and just in general valve is a bad company.

I strongly hate the fact that we have to deal with Steam simply because they're so useless. Nothing is done when it come to consoles in terms of piracy (even though in most cases it's worse on consoles), yet pc users have to put up with crap like this because we the pc users are the scape goat for everything possible that can go wrong. More and more developers choose to tie their games in with Steam and more and more people are getting sick of it. I'm sick of being treated like a criminal even after I've handed you my money.
User avatar
Daniel Brown
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 11:21 am

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:05 pm

Digital Distribution IS the norm now.

No, it isn't. Consoles vs PC... who sells more?

It does seem to be trending that way, but it simply is not currently.

The way you described Google, Facebook, iTunes and Steam as all "data mining", makes it seem like paranoia as opposed to genuine concerns. There are no privacy concerns with Steam. Ignoring hacking, keyloggers and stuff as that is possible for anything you do on the internet. The only information they have of mine is my name, date of birth and email address. That's less information than my local library have about me.

All aforementioned products track usage, and aggregate this data to sell to advertisers. Its a digital journal of your time, and when added to your personal information it presents a much clearer picture of you than your own photo on your driver's license.

That is what I meant by privacy, and yes... I am somewhat paranoid about trackers and block them through Firefox religiously. If you're going to sell my information to the highest bidder, I want some of that money.

So much for piracy I guess... :shrug:
User avatar
Blackdrak
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 11:40 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 1:37 pm

I've seen lots of posts on this forum saying how they absolutely despise Steam, and that they refuse to buy the game because of Steam?

Honestly, why? It looks like people think Valve will sell your personal info (lol). I dunno, maybe I'm missing the point. In any case, why do you hate Steam, if you do? Has it prevented you from buying Skyrim?

Obviously you have no clue if that’s all you think. I would bet there more people then one would realize that have held back on skyrim and many other games because of steam. My number one reason , this is just mine is that you are forced to use it, simple as that. This ties into the fact that im tethered to it, dependent on it, and the mercy of it, which is just wrong period. There is no argument about that, as im sure its been said, with steam you don’t really feel like you own your game, just feels like a long term rented game. I know all about offline mod, its not 100% reliable.. Steam encourages people to do things they normally wouldn’t to own a game with out it.. Who are the pirates here, I say steam are the real pirates by coming up with this horrid system to play games.
User avatar
matt white
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:43 pm

Post » Sat Jun 09, 2012 11:58 am

Physical copies are going nowhere, there isn't enough bandwith in the world for an entirely digital age.

Just mindless lipservice for a police product some people are satisfied with, and stating that Skyrim is Steam's top selling game is in no way an indicator of acceptance of Steam. People that don't have Steam didn't buy the game... Correlate that with the amount of Skyrim copies purchased for consoles. Then try and estimate how many people broke rank and played it their own way.

Where does Steam sit now? Thought so...

I would contend that the new age of non-privacy is becoming the norm, and perhaps when they have to sign into Steam just to watch The Kardashians or The Jersery Shore... only then will people begin to see the problem.

You are just pulling this out of your ass, aren't you.

Go look up some Steam statistics then come back.
User avatar
Elizabeth Davis
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:30 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim