175 hours out of a $60 game make the price of entertainment approximately 34 cents an hour. That's not getting your moneys worth? There are really that many alternative uses for your money that would have gotten you a better bang for the buck?
This is a pretty strong argument i actual tell alot of my friends when they consider a new game (any game) purchase.
Would you be disappointed if you played it for a week after spending 50 euros, totalling somewhere like 40+ hrs gametime, or would you rather go see 5 movies and be entertained for 10 hrs?
Games dont svck if they occupy you for 50-60 hrs or so.
Its the spoiled approach of the gamer feeling they *must* get at least 300+ hrs of joy for 50 euros.
Try dropping that amount of money for anything else but a videogame and hope to be entertained for more than 10 hrs.
Its comparing entertainment to entertainment, even though in a sequal to a (any)particular game the end result may net you less than what you originally experienced in its predecessor(s).