If every single post you make here is negative...

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 3:14 am


Then you don't need to be here on this forum because this game isn't for you.

You can go to the Morrowind, Oblivion, and Skyrim forums where you do care about the product.

No you dont get to tell people to swallow or shove off.
They have just as much right to post here as you do.

Now quit being undemocratic.
User avatar
luis dejesus
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:40 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 10:01 pm


Their statement is true - Bethesda is only working on single player games. Bethesda has nothing to do with the development of TES Online. Todd Howard and team have no involvement in this MMO.

I don't believe that. Can you offer me a link wherein they state they have no authority over decisions made for this game? Because that would be very stupid- that means Zenimax could write whatever lore and story they wanted. This is Bethesda's baby, they wouldn't hand it over without having any authority to say 'no' if something is just way out of line with TES lore.
User avatar
Rude Gurl
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:17 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 11:39 am

I don't believe that. Can you offer me a link wherein they state they have no authority over decisions made for this game? Because that would be very stupid- that means Zenimax could write whatever lore and story they wanted. This is Bethesda's baby, they wouldn't hand it over without having any authority to say 'no' if something is just way out of line with TES lore.

I think they said the lore guys check in with them every so often, just to make sure lore is correct... however BS has said that ESO is all on Zenimax Online and this is not there next project.
User avatar
Jeff Turner
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:35 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 12:31 am

delete
User avatar
Taylor Bakos
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:05 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 4:57 am

Replies are in bold and underlined.

Posted from other thread-

1) Really? I can't believe I even reading this. Bethesda Game Studios has already said the Elder Scrolls Online is not there next project and that is all on Zenimax Online.
Do you have any idea how game development works, find me a story were after a successful game (any game) that the company that made it put all there teams on it?

Is it so hard to believe that if a game is successful and makes money, a company would not put more resource to it?

I bet you can't because it would be stupid. Lets look at the FACTS, Skyrim sold over 10 million copies to retail alone, over $620 million dollars... not including digital which it was Steam's fastest selling game.
WoW the number 1 MMO, only has 10 million subscribers. ESO is not likely reach close to that amount at all, considering no other MMO has. Skyrim will likley bring in close, if not more that the amount of money they will generate from an MMO. Game companies do not, NOT make a sequel to a game that sold over 10 million copies. All I can ask is, are you people crazy?

Excuse me, Skyrim is a 1 time transaction. WoW is a MONTHLY transaction. So while Skyrim had a good run on the first month,
WoW is having STEADY INCOME EVERY MONTH. And WoW has been on the market since 2004. It is now 2012.
That is 8 years or 96 months of more then 10 million subscribers per month. I don't have to do the calculation to know that that is a crapload of money.
Is the Elder Scrolls MMO banking on this? The answer is YES

2) While an MMO would cost upwards of a few millions to produce, look how much they made on Skyrim alone... one bad game will not bankrupt them.
Almost ever developer/publisher has put out at least 1 bad game that flopped that are still here to tell the story. This is again another crazy thing to say, that has nothing to support it.

2 companies have shown us that a bad game can bankrupt them.

1) Trilobyte - Famous for The 7th Guest.
Took so long and so much money to make the 11th Hour, that when it released, the company is no more.

2) Ion Storm - Famous for well being the gathering of a dream team of developers such as John Romero, Warren Spector.
What happened? All it took was for 1 Daikatana to kill the company.

3) Bonus: Im sure you know the story of Duke Nukem Forever. WHERE IS 3D REALMS NOW????

What im trying to say is, with this uncertain economic climate, game studios will need to watch their step very carefully.
History has shown us that 1 bad game can cause the demise of a company.
Today's Bethesda if taken a wrong move, may well become another Ion Storm.
User avatar
Genevieve
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 2:50 am

It basically sounds like another WoW clone from the Gameinformer article. Why can't the developers see that the Elder Scrolls was meant to be a sandbox game? SOE did a wonderful job with Star Wars Galaxies (IMO) and they were even able to put player houses in. The way SWG handled the sandbox style was awesome too, you got to go to memorable locations, explore large dungeons, do instances, and find a lot of amazing stuff that was already established in the Star Wars lore. Plus, Space combat felt like space combat, not whatever the heck TOR made.

Unfortunately, they shut SWG down and TOR went up. (huge mistake)

All I'm saying is: If I wanted to play WoW, I'd go play WoW. They'd better not stop the making of Single Player Elder Scrolls games, and they should definitely not get pushed to the back seat while this MMO is active. Some of the ideas it's implementing sound cool, but most of them sound like re-hashed "fantasy MMO" ideas. If they insist on making an Elder Scrolls MMO, at least make it more like the Elder Scrolls series. Make it open-world (instead of segmenting off parts of dungeons or the world that the player isn't a high enough level for), give it player houses, PvE, first or third person views, and manual combat, not WoW combat.

/rant :D
User avatar
Lucky Boy
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:26 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 1:52 am

Seriously, it's simple: If you're not going to like this game, not going to play it, and have no interest in it, then there is no reason for you to be here posting your negativity every damn minute and ruining it for those of us who are excited.

It is one thing to post negative criticisms (in all honesty, from what I have read, I am not excited), but if all you are going to bring to this forum is a negative attitude, we don't want you here.

And "we care about the Elder Scrolls series" is not a valid reason to be constantly negative all the time.

This viewpoint is about as valid now as it was when the 4E D&D crowd told people they should stop complaining about the alterations made to the Forgotten Realms, or when the Mass Effect 3 fans(that didn't mind the ending) told the Retake ME crowd they should stop complaining. That is to say that it is not. I am not against the idea of a TES MMO, but only if it remained true to both the lore and the gameplay of the elder Elder Scrolls games. Designed around the 1st person perspective(with optional 3rd person), direct input of action, usage based skill gain unrestricted by classes, etc. If it does not have this then it is not a TES game and there are those that are unwilling to simply let Zenimax believe that we are content with a watered down doppelganger. I don't care if it's a WoW clone, a Guild Wars clone, or a Tetris clone. If it's not modeled after the TES series then I want Zenimax to know that they have lost a sale and why. I want them to know how many sales they've lost. I want the discontent to make themselves known.

On the other hand, I'm not going to invade threads to post off topic just to make myself heard. But hey: look at the title of the thread.
User avatar
lucile
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:37 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 12:17 am

This viewpoint is about as valid now as it was when the 4E D&D crowd told people they should stop complaining about the alterations made to the Forgotten Realms, or when the Mass Effect 3 fans(that didn't mind the ending) told the Retake ME crowd they should stop complaining. That is to say that it is not. I am not against the idea of a TES MMO, but only if it remained true to both the lore and the gameplay of the elder Elder Scrolls games. Designed around the 1st person perspective(with optional 3rd person), direct input of action, usage based skill gain unrestricted by classes, etc. If it does not have this then it is not a TES game and there are those that are unwilling to simply let Zenimax believe that we are content with a watered down doppelganger. I don't care if it's a WoW clone, a Guild Wars clone, or a Tetris clone. If it's not modeled after the TES series then I want Zenimax to know that they have lost a sale and why. I want them to know how many sales they've lost. I want the discontent to make themselves known.

On the other hand, I'm not going to invade threads to post off topic just to make myself heard. But hey: look at the title of the thread.

You need to seperate the main RPG series from the other Elder Scrolls games here.
The MMO will not be a part of the main series.
It will be like Redguard, Battlespire or the travel games.

If history is any indication then that means that while gameplay may vary a lot from that of the RPG series, adherence to lore and lore building is as consistent and impressive as ever.
User avatar
Craig Martin
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:25 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 12:46 am

Im looking forward to this game but posts like the OP's seriously annoy me.

Why shouldnt people be able to give their opinion on a subject they have strong feelings about?
People who are unhappy with this decision have exactly the same right as any of us to post what they think.

This whole mentality of: Spoute praise or youre not welcome here is not only unfair, it is dangerous.
It is undemocratic.
These are not the kind of mores and morals that we hold dear in our civilised societies.
Debate and even just opinion giving should show all shades of opinion people may have on the subject, and not single out the one most in favour, while shouting that everyone who doesnt agree doesnt belong here.

This childish, undemocratic and totalitarian attitude needs to go, it is not an advlt nor an enlightened position to take.

I agree with this, but at least on my part, I'm not complaining about people who have a negative opinion (I.E.: "I don't think this game will be good for reasons x, y, and z"), but that's not what is happening.

I'm complaining about the doomsayers and sensationalists who are whining and crying about how horrible MMO's are, this game shouldn't even be made (completely negating the people who are excited for an Elder Scrolls MMO), ZeniMax and Bethesda are evil overlords, and making demands that absolutely must be met otherwise Bethesda and ZeniMax will continue to be bashed. It is the sense of entitlement that people have, when it is as simple as if you don't like the game you don't have to buy it.

I am excited for an Elder Scrolls MMO, however from what I have read I don't think this is the game I am looking for, because it sounds like they aren't really using anything that makes The Elder Scrolls series special, and instead making a generic MMO and slapping the Elder Scrolls name on it. I'm not anticipating a huge success in my eyes.

That doesn't mean that I'm going to run around doomsaying about how horrible a decision this was, and demanding that ZeniMax reconsider. I'll just simply decide to play it or not.
User avatar
rheanna bruining
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:00 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 11:37 am

Is it so hard to believe that if a game is successful and makes money, a company would not put more resource to it?

They may hire more developers at Zenimax Online, there not going to bring over Bethesda Game Studios... they have there own projects to work on, which not only includes TES, but Fallout too, maybe even a new IP. BGS has already said they have a new project planned.

Excuse me, Skyrim is a 1 time transaction. WoW is a MONTHLY transaction. So while Skyrim had a good run on the first month,
WoW is having STEADY INCOME EVERY MONTH. And WoW has been on the market since 2004. It is now 2012.
That is 8 years or 96 months of more then 10 million subscribers per month. I don't have to do the calculation to know that that is a crapload of money.
Is the Elder Scrolls MMO banking on this? The answer is YES

ESO is not going to get anywhere near WoW subscribers that is the point... no other MMO has been able too. NONE. This is the point, SWTOR only has 1.7 active subscribers, it will barley make a profit if it keeps in current subscribers. MMO's cost a lot more money to make than a single player game. So Skyrims sales are, while not making money for them every month... has been almost pure profit. Your also forgetting there is a huge difference between $60 and $15 when it comes to profit.

Also SWTOR cost EA around 200 - 300 million dollars to make, this was not beacuse of voice acting as I seen you post, it had over 800 developers working on it at one time over the span of 6 years. I pretty sure I read that ESO only has around 250... and even then EA said if it had failed they would have still been okay.

2 companies have shown us that a bad game can bankrupt them.

1) Trilobyte - Famous for The 7th Guest.
Took so long and so much money to make the 11th Hour, that when it released, the company is no more.

2) Ion Storm - Famous for well being the gathering of a dream team of developers such as John Romero, Warren Spector.
What happened? All it took was for 1 Daikatana to kill the company.

3) Bonus: Im sure you know the story of Duke Nukem Forever. WHERE IS 3D REALMS NOW????

Apple to Oranges, these companies don't make or have the money Zenimax does...
User avatar
Becky Palmer
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:43 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 8:23 am

I am excited for an Elder Scrolls MMO, however from what I have read I don't think this is the game I am looking for, because it sounds like they aren't really using anything that
makes The Elder Scrolls series special, and instead making a generic MMO and slapping the Elder Scrolls name on it. I'm not anticipating a huge success in my eyes.

I agree with you on this point.
Bottom line is, the GI article did not excite alot of people.
User avatar
Ludivine Poussineau
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:49 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 7:43 am

Do you really think that TES online will be anything like Skyrim?

Do you think it wil be anything like WoW?
User avatar
Cccurly
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:18 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 4:49 am

No you dont get to tell people to swallow or shove off.
They have just as much right to post here as you do.

Now quit being undemocratic.

Oh well I guess in that case, it's time for me to head over to the WoW forums and whine and moan and [censored] about how [censored] that game is.

Because you know, even though it's a game that I hate, have no hopes of ever enjoying, and I am clearly not part of the intended audience, I should just be allowed to go over there and whine and moan about how awful that game is, and they will have no place to tell me to shut up because hey... that's undemocratic...
User avatar
Manuela Ribeiro Pereira
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:24 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 12:13 pm


I agree with this, but at least on my part, I'm not complaining about people who have a negative opinion (I.E.: "I don't think this game will be good for reasons x, y, and z"), but that's not what is happening.

I'm complaining about the doomsayers and sensationalists who are whining and crying about how horrible MMO's are, this game shouldn't even be made (completely negating the people who are excited for an Elder Scrolls MMO), ZeniMax and Bethesda are evil overlords, and making demands that absolutely must be met otherwise Bethesda and ZeniMax will continue to be bashed. It is the sense of entitlement that people have, when it is as simple as if you don't like the game you don't have to buy it.

I am excited for an Elder Scrolls MMO, however from what I have read I don't think this is the game I am looking for, because it sounds like they aren't really using anything that makes The Elder Scrolls series special, and instead making a generic MMO and slapping the Elder Scrolls name on it. I'm not anticipating a huge success in my eyes.

That doesn't mean that I'm going to run around doomsaying about how horrible a decision this was, and demanding that ZeniMax reconsider. I'll just simply decide to play it or not.

I have very little experience with MMO's
I played the wow and eve free trial and have played runescape a bit.
So Im sort of seeing this with a mind unsullied by experiences with bad/ generic MMO's I suppose.

What excites me is the opportunity to meet up with other real people inside the virtual TES universe and being very true to lore and roleplaying.

The posts of people that are often just one line saying how bad things are, well I just ignore them.
They have the right to have their say, even if they lack the will or ability to use proper arguments and instead just emote.
Thats perfectly fine with me, possibly by venting their displeasure they relieve themselves of stress and it shows other people who think the same they are not alone.
Just let em have their post, Id say.
Its when we start going against it that it becomes complicated and unfriendly.
User avatar
Nancy RIP
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:42 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 10:38 pm


Oh well I guess in that case, it's time for me to head over to the WoW forums and whine and moan and [censored] about how [censored] that game is.

Because you know, even though it's a game that I hate, have no hopes of ever enjoying, and I am clearly not part of the intended audience, I should just be allowed to go over there and whine and moan about how awful that game is, and they will have no place to tell me to shut up because hey... that's undemocratic...

The distinct difference here is that these ARE fans of the game world they are using for this. Your anology is fallacious.
User avatar
Hussnein Amin
 
Posts: 3557
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:15 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 10:38 pm

They may hire more developers at Zenimax Online, there not going to bring over Bethesda Game Studios... they have there own projects to work on, which not only includes TES, but Fallout too, maybe even a new IP. BGS has already said they have a new project planned.

The new project is most likely Fallout 4. But im just guessing.


ESO is not going to get anywhere near WoW subscribers that is the point... no other MMO has been able too. NONE. This is the point, SWTOR only has 1.7 active subscribers, it will barley make a profit if it keeps in current subscribers. MMO's cost a lot more money to make than a single player game.

Correct. So if no MMO can beat WoW, why be an MMO then? Why compete with WoW?
And don't forget, Blizzard themselves have yet to release info on the Titan Project. Why go head to head with Blizzard?
Elder Scrolls do excellent single player RPGs, so be that way. There isn't any need to make an MMO.

and even then EA said if it had failed they would have still been okay.

Of course they'll say that, no one will say "Oh if we fail we're finished, but we still gonna do it anyway"


Apple to Oranges, these companies don't make or have the money Zenimax does...

I beg to differ. Look at Ion Storm, the amount of money they spent was rediculous, im not joking.
I remembered John Romero had like 8 Ferraris at that time? And the building they bought was so lavishly made.

User avatar
Latisha Fry
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 7:49 am

What excites me is the opportunity to meet up with other real people inside the virtual TES universe and being very true to lore and roleplaying.

You are in for a surprise when you will discover the wonderful mmo community.
User avatar
Lisa Robb
 
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:13 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 2:20 am

You are in for a surprise when you will discover the wonderful mmo community.

A bunch of lore forumites are going to team up in the Ebonheart alliance.
It will be great :)
User avatar
Leah
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:11 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 9:11 am

This viewpoint is about as valid now as it was when the 4E D&D crowd told people they should stop complaining about the alterations made to the Forgotten Realms, or when the Mass Effect 3 fans(that didn't mind the ending) told the Retake ME crowd they should stop complaining. That is to say that it is not. I am not against the idea of a TES MMO, but only if it remained true to both the lore and the gameplay of the elder Elder Scrolls games. Designed around the 1st person perspective(with optional 3rd person), direct input of action, usage based skill gain unrestricted by classes, etc. If it does not have this then it is not a TES game and there are those that are unwilling to simply let Zenimax believe that we are content with a watered down doppelganger. I don't care if it's a WoW clone, a Guild Wars clone, or a Tetris clone. If it's not modeled after the TES series then I want Zenimax to know that they have lost a sale and why. I want them to know how many sales they've lost. I want the discontent to make themselves known.

On the other hand, I'm not going to invade threads to post off topic just to make myself heard. But hey: look at the title of the thread.

Why does it matter?

If you don't like the product, you don't buy it, simple as that. You are simply not the target audience - ZeniMax is not wrong for that. They are only "wrong" if they make a product that is broken. They are not wrong because they made a product you don't like. In that case, you simply have the option of not buying it. But going on a crusade to make your voice heard to make sure they "know" the error of their ways is ridiculous.

I don't like World of WarCraft. I am not going to go on the WoW forums and complain about how bad I think that game svcks, and all the things I think Blizzard did wrong. I am just simply not going to buy that game nor subscribe to it. That is the extent that I need to vocalize my opinion. Me going on the WoW forums to rant and rave about how bad that game svcks is going to 1.) do absolutely nothing productive and 2.) only piss people off who do enjoy the game and want to discuss it without people like me running around everywhere talking about how bad the game svcks.
User avatar
Céline Rémy
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:45 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 9:03 pm

I have very little experience with MMO's
I played the wow and eve free trial and have played runescape a bit.
So Im sort of seeing this with a mind unsullied by experiences with bad/ generic MMO's I suppose.

What excites me is the opportunity to meet up with other real people inside the virtual TES universe and being very true to lore and roleplaying.

The posts of people that are often just one line saying how bad things are, well I just ignore them.
They have the right to have their say, even if they lack the will or ability to use proper arguments and instead just emote.
Thats perfectly fine with me, possibly by venting their displeasure they relieve themselves of stress and it shows other people who think the same they are not alone.
Just let em have their post, Id say.
Its when we start going against it that it becomes complicated and unfriendly.

If a bad video game is causing them stress, then I think they need to re-evaluate their life.

The distinct difference here is that these ARE fans of the game world they are using for this. Your anology is fallacious.

I was a fan of the WarCraft games and world before World of WarCraft... OFF TO THE WOW FORUMS I GO TO [censored]!!!

How about another anology - I was a huge fan of the Metal Gear series, long long before it became Metal Gear Solid. I played the PS and PS2 titles, but ultimately, the series started heading in a direction that was not what I liked about the series.

Instead of going online and [censored]ing about it, I just stopped buying the games when they became something I no longer enjoyed, and I found something else to fill that void.

Or even better yet, I was a loyal Star Wars Galaxies gamer when the Combat Upgrade, and eventually New Game Enhancements came out. Those changes, in my eyes, ruined the game and took away everything I had loved about SWG. I left the game, and I left the forums, instead of hanging around whining and crying about what it became. I moved on, because I realized hey, as much as it svcks, as much as I want the original SWG back, it's a freaking video game, it's not that serious, and unfortunately, I am no longer the target audience that they are looking for.
User avatar
Kat Stewart
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:30 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 6:29 am

Why does it matter?

If you don't like the product, you don't buy it, simple as that. You are simply not the target audience - ZeniMax is not wrong for that. They are only "wrong" if they make a product that is broken. They are not wrong because they made a product you don't like. In that case, you simply have the option of not buying it. But going on a crusade to make your voice heard to make sure they "know" the error of their ways is ridiculous.

I don't like World of WarCraft. I am not going to go on the WoW forums and complain about how bad I think that game svcks, and all the things I think Blizzard did wrong. I am just simply not going to buy that game nor subscribe to it. That is the extent that I need to vocalize my opinion. Me going on the WoW forums to rant and rave about how bad that game svcks is going to 1.) do absolutely nothing productive and 2.) only piss people off who do enjoy the game and want to discuss it without people like me running around everywhere talking about how bad the game svcks.

He is the customer- he is an Elder Scrolls player. It's absurd to tell a future customer they have no right to express their displeasure in the brand. If I use Tide detergent, and they decide to do another product and I don't like the look of that product, as their customer, they EXPECT me to give them that information. Companies spend millions of dollars to find out the information we are sharing here for FREE. This is free marketing information for them, and yes, they absolutely want us to share our opinions.
User avatar
kelly thomson
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:18 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 11:33 pm

You need to seperate the main RPG series from the other Elder Scrolls games here.
The MMO will not be a part of the main series.
It will be like Redguard, Battlespire or the travel games.

If history is any indication then that means that while gameplay may vary a lot from that of the RPG series, adherence to lore and lore building is as consistent and impressive as ever.

You're missing the point. If Zenimax would do the property justice and capture the spirit of the gameplay, they would likely have a subscriber in me(assuming it didn't also fall into the same endgame = raid constantly trap that drove me away from MMOs altogether). But while I own Battlespire(never could find a copy of Redguard), I never put anywhere near as much time into that game as I did Daggerfall and beyond. And that game bore a lot more similarities to TES proper than this MMO seems to at first glance. And so I want Zenimax to know how badly they missed an opportunity by going the safe(tell that to the corpses of MMOs past) route instead of having the balls(or sense, depending on how you look at it) to make a TES game that appeals to people that like TES games.

Believe me, I want this early info to be off the mark so I can eat these words later and enjoy the game. But I don't see me being wrong about this at this point.
User avatar
Sammykins
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:48 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 5:25 am

He is the customer- he is an Elder Scrolls player. It's absurd to tell a future customer they have no right to express their displeasure in the brand. If I use Tide detergent, and they decide to do another product and I don't like the look of that product, as their customer, they EXPECT me to give them that information. Companies spend millions of dollars to find out the information we are sharing here for FREE. This is free marketing information for them, and yes, they absolutely want us to share our opinions.

Except in this case, Tide detergent still makes the detergent that you have been buying for however long, there is just an alternative detergent under the Tide logo, and you are not forced in any way to purchase or use the new detergent that you don't like, you still have the old detergent that you can always go back to.

If you don't like the look of Elder Scrolls Online, it literally is as simple as "don't buy it, don't subscribe, don't play it", and you lose nothing in that deal.

ZeniMax owes you nothing. They are releasing a product, and it is up to you to determine if you want to purchase that product or not. It's obvious that you don't, so why linger around in a community for something that you have no interest in?
User avatar
Gemma Flanagan
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:34 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 8:35 pm

You're missing the point. If Zenimax would do the property justice and capture the spirit of the gameplay, they would likely have a subscriber in me(assuming it didn't also fall into the same endgame = raid constantly trap that drove me away from MMOs altogether). But while I own Battlespire(never could find a copy of Redguard), I never put anywhere near as much time into that game as I did Daggerfall and beyond. And that game bore a lot more similarities to TES proper than this MMO seems to at first glance. And so I want Zenimax to know how badly they missed an opportunity by going the safe(tell that to the corpses of MMOs past) route instead of having the balls(or sense, depending on how you look at it) to make a TES game that appeals to people that like TES games.

Believe me, I want this early info to be off the mark so I can eat these words later and enjoy the game. But I don't see me being wrong about this at this point.

I understand.
When it comes to this I really dont have an opinion yet, I dont have enough info or knowledge of MMO's.
Im going to wait at least until the beta until I decide if this is a game I want to play or not.
I have some concerns about being true to lore and if I find it has been watered down or retconned too much I wont play it.
But when it comes to gameplay, Ill have to reserve an opinion until I can make a more educated one.
User avatar
Laura
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:11 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 9:35 am

Except in this case, Tide detergent still makes the detergent that you have been buying for however long, there is just an alternative detergent under the Tide logo, and you are not forced in any way to purchase or use the new detergent that you don't like, you still have the old detergent that you can always go back to.

If you don't like the look of Elder Scrolls Online, it literally is as simple as "don't buy it, don't subscribe, don't play it", and you lose nothing in that deal.

ZeniMax owes you nothing. They are releasing a product, and it is up to you to determine if you want to purchase that product or not. It's obvious that you don't, so why linger around in a community for something that you have no interest in?

I'm sorry but you are very ignorant. I'm not saying that in a rude way, I'm saying it in the direct definition of the word- you have no idea what you are talking about. Companies want to know why someone who should be their demographic (an Elder Scrolls customer in this case) will not purchase their product. They are marketing this product to this demographic. Knowing why this particular person is not going to play is information they want, and they need. I have worked marketing. I know exactly what I am talking about. Please stop attempting to dispute this. It's common knowledge to anyone who has held a marketing or creative services job in any industry.
User avatar
Ludivine Dupuy
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:51 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games