Bethesda changes the lore because the try to change the game to the liking of most fans like they did with the werewolf and the vampires its all because people fell entitled to tell Bethesda how to do their job and their games. Its no the people story and it's not their lore ( i am not saying that the random change of lore is acceptable) Bethesda can as they please with the story of their game
And we are completely within our rights to criticize their decisions, and to abandon them as customers if they continue making design/story decisions we don't agree with.
This isn't an entitlement thread. The goal of this thread is to put forth several ideas of how members of the community feel vampires and werewolves could have been handled better than they were in Skyrim, in the hopes that Bethesda sees ideas here that they agree enhance these creatures, or at the very least give them an idea of where to go with them. If you disagree with these points, feel free to counter them, but do so in a way that actually examines these suggestions and argues against them either on the basis of lore, game design, all around feasibility, or something similar. Saying "Bethesda can do what it wants because they made the game not you" doesn't refute these suggestions.
Are there particular suggestions here you are opposed to, or do you just think we shouldn't criticize Bethesda and just buy their stuff with big grins? If the former, what are they, why are you opposed to them, and what do you think would be a better direction to go in? If the latter, I'm sorry but you might want to avoid this thread. If you think people suggesting what they feel are improvements is just them complaining and being self-entitled ad nauseum, you'll be much happier elsewhere.