I already said that http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988732882/screenshot/649876689769992010?tab=public. Not that i'm complaining... Whistling:
Yeah, the steel plate armor is more flattering to women though,

Realistically such armor would be pretty bad to wear in combat, it should be shaped more like the http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988732882/screenshot/649876689731447461/?tab=public.
Why bad though? I would have said that women might actually find it more comfortable to have a briastplate that actually fit their curves, but in truth that would likely only be necessary for the bustiest women. Soldiers wore padded clothing beneath all forms of armor, whether plate or mail or what have you, so really they wouldn't need special accomodation for the boobs.
That said, the U.S. Army has worked on reshaping the hard plate that goes in body armor to better accomodate women's figure. It might not make much difference for smaller-chested women, but some women do apparently find the body armor uncomfortable in the chest. There's only a kevlar pad, the cloth of the plate carrier itself, and their shirt beneath the hard plate, so it's not as well padded as what a knight in 1066 might have worn beneath his mail shirt or briastplate.
Honestly, my vote goes to Dragonbone Armor, closely tied by Daedric Armor. Both look more like something from a GWAR / KISS album cover than effective combat gear.
See, here's the thing. I thought like that at first, because I really like the lower-end armors like iron, leather, steel, etc. But look at it this way - your average person has some very practical, real-world armor in this game. The guards are all wearing mail shirts with some leather fringes, I think, along with a fully-enclosing helmet. Iron armor is common. Move up the list a bit, and you find steel plate. Still very real-world, but more ornate, as though someone with means had it made for them.
Now, move up a bit more. Now you've got Elven and Dwarven armor. These look exotic to indicate they come from non-human societies, and so are somewhat flashier. Then you get to the highest-end armors - glass, ebony, daedric, and dragon scale/plate. These are the ultra-rare armors, the ones worn by legendary heroes. They stand out. Glass and Ebony involve rare ores, not commonly found and often located in hard-to-find places guarded by dangerous creatures. Daedric not only requires ebony, but
the heart of a demon. So yeah, that one looks like something Sauron would wear, and sensibly so. It's the right armor for a thoroughly evil warrior-mage who wants to - dare I say it? - RULE THE WORLD!!! MUWAHH-HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! And for the dragon armors, of course, you have to
kill a dragon. So again, they look very unusual, rather than something you'd see in our own history.
Although I ordinarily argue the point that fantasy should be grounded in the legend and myth of our own world, and the architecture should reflect the past of our own world to achieve the right level of verisimilitude, we have to remember that fantasy still derives from the
legend of our world. It has to have the right degree of otherworldliness, with a basis in the common.
not replying to your actual comment, but what it says below it. I was just wondering if nords etc where europe, and redguards where africa, and khajiit where asia, where do the argonians fit in? You even got the akaviri guys, but not our lizard friends D: Also akavir are obviously asia. If khajiits where middle east, then ya.
I tend not to think the non-human races as reflecting any cultures of our own Earth. The Nords are the Norse, the Imperials are the Romans, the Bretons are the pre-Saxon Britons, or the Gauls, or some other Celtic group, and the Redguards are North Africans. None of the elven or beast-folk races fit with real-world human cultures.
You know, I find that on average, the higher up the teir, the more ridiculous the armor gets. I much more prefer the lower stuff like the iron, steel, leather, scaled, etc.
See my above comments.
I don't think any outfit is particularly "ridiculous" but all the boobs-ahoy metal armors for females are certainly a bit unusual.

Female warrios were incredibly rare in all parts of the ancient world... Even then it was mostly just men's FemDom fantasies, as with the Greeks' Amazon legend. However, if there were any, they probably wore the same stuff as men did.
There have been multiple threads where this sort of thing gets discussed. I had one person imply I was an unrepentant sixist because I said that while female heroes are one thing - heroes are by definition people that don't fit into the averages of society - I found it highly implausible that the guards in every hold seem evenly mixed between men and women.
Overall, I don't have a problem with the Forsworn armor because the women don't really seem much more exposed than the men. The difference is largely negligible.