The more interesting thing here is that people seem to want an endless churn of sequels ... I'd argue that if a franchise is to have any worth, it should be allowed to die on a high note. Star Wars could have done without the prequels; or, at the least, the prequels should have been executed properly, and then GL should have let the whole thing die, including collectibles, video games, cartoons, books ...
There were some pretty darn good Star Wars video games that came out during the 90s and early 00s, though, and some of them were actually innovative as opposed to watered down clones of successful IPs, so I'm glad that he didn't just let the franchise die. I heart TIE Fighter, greatest Star Wars game/space sim ever.
Disney, and everyone that has licences to Marvel property, are going to devalue that entire line of IPs, if they keep tossing out slop.
I do agree with this though, I'd take a single exceptional movie over a single exceptional movie that is cheapened by a series of shameless cash in sequels any day. There are some sequels that do their predecessors justice, and there are certainly some excellent film trilogies out there, but these are the exception as opposed to the rule. Disney has never been particularly good at delivering satisfying sequels, and while I usually admire persistence, it's getting a little ridiculous at this point. Has anyone here ever seen a Disney sequel that wasn't just mediocre?
Iron Man 1 is the only one that's above mediocre. I agree with you on the rest.
Now see I didn't even like that one, Robert Downey Junior did a fairly good job at making the protagonist likable, but outside of that the film was pretty 'meh.
... is Pocahontas with smurfs. What did you expect? All of its worth hangs on a gimmick-- 3D-- which can't really be experienced properly outside of a cinema. But in the cinema, that movie is a visual glory. It doesn't have anything else going for it.
More Dances with Wolves, but my point still stands.