» Fri May 13, 2011 2:11 pm
Fallout 3 had a development cycle of approx 1.5 years (based on my own calculations). Fallout: New Vegas will have had a similar approx. 1.5 year development cycle (again, based on my own calculations). Thus, it doesn't appear to me that F:NV was rushed, which appears to be Obsidian's biggest weakness and the area which causes the most bugs/faults/unfinished content from them. Thus, after doing a little research via Wikipedia on approx. development times, I am a *little* less worried that Obsidian was rushed or pressured to finish early.
I am still a little concerned that there may be unfinished content, quests, or various bugs that may never get fixed - but they are less of a concern than they might otherwise be if the development time for F:NV were less than it is. My hope is that this will be an excellent game, with plenty of twists, turns, replay-value and fun! I don't think that I will be proven wrong there - but I am willing to admit that there is that slight element of doubt in the back of my mind.