I didn't say that at all.
First off, it's already been explained how the long term cost of PCs is not a great deal more than console. I won't re-hash what's already been said- read the thread. It's even been suggested that if you buy a lot of games, it's cheaper in the long run to go the PC route.
Second, what I said was that when you game on PC, you have the OPTION to upgrade every ...however many years you choose- I never said 2-3, most people upgrade more along the lines of 4-5 years. I built my new PC last year after using the same laptop for more than 4 years. Say a person bought a new PC the same time his buddy bought a new console. When you consider the cost of the TV, and the cost of the non-gaming PC that the console user has, they both spend near the same amount. 4 years later, the PC user may or may not decide to either upgrade (spending about what the console user might spend on a new TV), or even decide to buy a whole new PC- or he might not. If he doesn't he still has as powerful a gaming machine as the console user has.
A lot of people seem to have the notion that a PC MUST be upgraded or replaced every X years. That is simply not true. It doesn't become obsolete any faster than a console does. The difference is that a PC CAN BE upgraded whenever the owner of it feels like he wants to. A console cannot. It can only be upgraded when the manufacturers decide it's time to release "the next generation" of them.
Really? Because that's what I got out of it...
Second, no. The previous explanations of computer "economics" doesn't stand up to scrutiny. It's entirely debatable. It still
COSTS MORE to build a computer. I like your use of the word "suggested" though, because you're suggesting to me that it is cheaper in to long run, to update parts that cost the price of an entire console on its own. (:
Third, okay..? So you're still agreeing with me that my computer is going to rapidly become outdated and cost a [censored]-ton to update, but it doesn't matter if my hardware becomes outdated because I can decide when to update it..? The logic, my friend, is entirely circular. If it is going to take me 10 years to save the cash up to update my entire rig, but a console becomes "obsolete" in that time, I might as well be buying consoles and enjoying all the new games in between because it is inevitably cheaper to do it that way.
What has a 1TB SSD got to do with the price of cheese, I couldn't even justify the price of one to myself but can still afford to buy one (maybe, after a bank raid perhaps). Why get a 1TB SSD, are you mental?
SSDs have also dropped in price thanks to tech advancements, hence I have a couple of 250GB ones now that I would never have dreamed of buying previously.
I do agree the console price drops were more to do with sales than them becoming obsolete, still outdated though.
They also get updated models that are really just versions that are cheaper for Sony of Microsoft to mass produce, passing on some of the savings to the customer. All driven by market competition, not because they think it would be nice for the consumer.
The 1Tb (Because the 1Tb has the most utility value to
me, maybe not
you.) was practically the only reason I bought this computer. Gaming computers are excessively expensive when you get in to ram, drives, CPUs, GPUs... Going pack to your whole "auto performance" spiel, I kind of feel like you're trying to sell me a Ferrari of an ideology when all I needed out of this computer was a truck.