Fallout New Vegas Achievements Revealed!

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:03 am

That's 49 more than we're allowed to have for Fallout: New Vegas.Because we're limited to a maximum of 50 achievements for the core game, as I posted before.
Did Bethesda allot the number of achievements or some lazy half-assed reason? You could more achievements and still have the total be 1000. So does this mean Bethesda will restrict Obsidian in the future when it comes to DLC? Can't have more than 5 achivements when the total is still 100? Or is it Microsofts fault?


The achievements/trophies are regulated by Microsoft and Sony and both companies have it mandatory to release games with these in them. However they also have limitations. You can only have these many achievement points and these many achievements. Figure out how you want to break it down for the fans. The Orange Box got away with 99 achievements because it wasn't one game; it was five. Still though I'm sure Microsoft didn't let them just make that instantly mean 250 achievements, and instead created a restriction for any game bundles to only have a maximum of 99 achievements. After all those gamer points are used as currency on the Xbox Marketplace, and if a game has a ton of achievement points, it creates a friction in the gaming industry since some companies will opt to make more achievements so people will buy their game just to get those points, and it means less Xbox 360 games have to be bought for a large gamerscore. It sounds idiotic, but some people really care about their achievement points.
The game points are not used as currency one slight bit. The points are just points for completion and nothing more.
User avatar
Bloomer
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 9:23 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 7:11 am

I like the achievements, i like how their is no karma/reputation based achievements, and i like the weapon category achievements, it'll make me actually try out some of the other categories, all i used in Fo3 was small guns and melee weapons. The one i like the most is the heal 10,00 points with food one, for some reason i just like the idea of actually surviving, i rarely ate food in Fo3, stimpacks were there instead.

Doesn't the mere presence of the weapon achievements just make it like a laundry list of "I guess I gotta get all my Unarmed kills now"? I remember playing Borderlands and spending a lot of boring time after I'd finished the game just wandering around killin stuff to pat myself on the back for senselessly killing a bunch of folks just cause I needed 200 more kills with my rocker launcher.
User avatar
Gavin Roberts
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:14 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 8:58 am

After all those gamer points are used as currency on the Xbox Marketplace

Can you elaborate on that a little bit? This is the first I've heard they can be used as a currency.
User avatar
Rodney C
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:54 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:53 pm

Did Bethesda allot the number of achievements or some lazy half-assed reason? You could more achievements and still have the total be 1000. So does this mean Bethesda will restrict Obsidian in the future when it comes to DLC? Can't have more than 5 achivements when the total is still 100? Or is it Microsofts fault?


The game points are not used as currency one slight bit. The points are just points for completion and nothing more.

Who cares honestly? Play the game because you want to play it, I'd rather the development team spend time polishing & making the game better then thinking up ridiculous achievements. :tops:
User avatar
Rhiannon Jones
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:18 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:06 pm

Yeah I won't lie to myself, they were kinda major, like when I saw "The House Always Wins" I [censored] my pants.


That achievement might be for getting kicked out from all the casinos after winning too much.
User avatar
Robert Devlin
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:19 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:03 pm

Who cares honestly? Play the game because you want to play it, I'd rather the development team spend time polishing & making the game better then thinking up ridiculous achievements. :tops:
I don't know. Sometimes the achievements give more of a replayability factor. That's just me though. Doesn't matter, I'll just be fully exploring the Mojave Wasteland anyway in New Vegas.
User avatar
Kira! :)))
 
Posts: 3496
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:07 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:35 am

Doesn't the mere presence of the weapon achievements just make it like a laundry list of "I guess I gotta get all my Unarmed kills now"? I remember playing Borderlands and spending a lot of boring time after I'd finished the game just wandering around killin stuff to pat myself on the back for senselessly killing a bunch of folks just cause I needed 200 more kills with my rocker launcher.


If you just focus on one group of weapons at a time it does get boring. I plan on making a few different characters (eventually) with different play styles and weapons styles (for example maybe a tough bruiser, a sneaky ninja, a charismatic gunman, a smart energy guy, etc.), and switching between them so i don't get bored with one weapon group. And plus 10,000 points of damage isn't that much. If you were using a hunting rifle that deals 20 damage, against 3 raiders, that would be like 250 damage dealt at the end of that battle. Ands there much more enemies you'll have to kill by the end of the game.\

Oh, and theres going to be so many different kinds of weapons within each weapons group, by the time you get to testing and using all the normal weapons, modded weapons, and custom weapons you'll probably get the achivements without thinking about it,
User avatar
Laura Cartwright
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:12 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:10 am

I thought the achievements were alright but they have no origionality. Most of them really screamed "COPIED GEARS OF WAR" to me. They need to have like
"Glass this!"--- Kill a wanamingo using the orbital laser satelite. Reference to halo, using a laser to kill an alien.
"Ha thats definetly copy right infringment"---- When an opponent in knocked down on the ground use melee to curb stomp him.
"If This is cannon somebodys gonna b mad"---- Find the colony of Mother Ship zeta alien survivors.
"Fawkes it!"---- Find Fawkes on his journey through New Vegas
User avatar
Carys
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:15 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:57 am

Did Bethesda allot the number of achievements or some lazy half-assed reason? You could more achievements and still have the total be 1000. So does this mean Bethesda will restrict Obsidian in the future when it comes to DLC? Can't have more than 5 achivements when the total is still 100? Or is it Microsofts fault?


The game points are not used as currency one slight bit. The points are just points for completion and nothing more.
My apologies, I could've sworn Gamerpoints = Microsoft Points. I don't have an Xbox 360 and got this assumption from seeing some friends' Gamerpoints and assuming those were Microsoft Points.

And it's Microsoft points. Bethesda and Obsidian don't make the rules for the number of achievements they can have, Microsoft does. I stated this earlier as did Josh. The maximum number that ONE game may have on the 360 is 50 achievements. The Orange Box was an excemption because it was a bundle of five games rather than just one, but was still restricted to 99 achievements to ensure that there wouldn't be an inflation in Gamerscores, because again, some people really do give a damn about how many achievement points or trophies they have. Bethesda will not restrict DLCs unless it conflicts with one of their ideas (like Josh said before that they wanted to do something in Arizona but Bethesda threw up some red flags because they had some plans for the area), but the number of achievements and points will have to comply with Microsoft's rules, or Microsoft will not allow the game to be released on their console.
User avatar
Your Mum
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:23 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 8:05 am

Is hardcoe mode still separated from the difficulty level? I mean we'll be able to play on hardcoe mode/Easy play won't we? I'm only asking because I just assumed there would be a hardcoe mode/Very Hard play achievement as well for some reason.
User avatar
Betsy Humpledink
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:56 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:41 am

Is hardcoe mode still separated from the difficulty level? I mean we'll be able to play on hardcoe mode/Easy play won't we? I'm only asking because I just assumed there would be a hardcoe mode/Very Hard play achievement as well for some reason.
Yes hardcoe mode and difficulty are still separate. It doesn't mean that hardcoe/Easy will be easy though. :P
User avatar
CORY
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:16 pm

That achievement might be for getting kicked out from all the casinos after winning too much.


Actually, there's an achievement for that. It's called http://www.xbox360achievements.org/game/fallout-new-vegas/achievement/43062-The-Courier-Who-Broke-the-Bank.html.
User avatar
Jesus Sanchez
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:15 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 9:58 am

My apologies, I could've sworn Gamerpoints = Microsoft Points. I don't have an Xbox 360 and got this assumption from seeing some friends' Gamerpoints and assuming those were Microsoft Points.

And it's Microsoft points. Bethesda and Obsidian don't make the rules for the number of achievements they can have, Microsoft does. I stated this earlier as did Josh. The maximum number that ONE game may have on the 360 is 50 achievements. The Orange Box was an excemption because it was a bundle of five games rather than just one, but was still restricted to 99 achievements to ensure that there wouldn't be an inflation in Gamerscores, because again, some people really do give a damn about how many achievement points or trophies they have. Bethesda will not restrict DLCs unless it conflicts with one of their ideas (like Josh said before that they wanted to do something in Arizona but Bethesda threw up some red flags because they had some plans for the area), but the number of achievements and points will have to comply with Microsoft's rules, or Microsoft will not allow the game to be released on their console.
Gamerscore is completely seperated from Microsoft Points which are used to purchase things on XBOX Live Marketplace.
User avatar
Daniel Brown
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 11:21 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:55 am

Just be glad there isn't a 'kill 2199 people' achievement. Something like that is very vulnerable to glitches.

Grindy Achievements > Glitched and unobtainable Achievements every single time.

I'm so glad these are nothing like the Alpha Protocol achievements. :cheat:
User avatar
Vicki Gunn
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:59 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:16 pm

Yes hardcoe mode and difficulty are still separate. It doesn't mean that hardcoe/Easy will be easy though. :P

Oh good.. that's exactly what I want.... .I'm really looking forward to sleeping, eating, ammo weight, blah blah... I just don't want it to take 500 rounds into somebodies head just to bring them down. I don't care how tough somethings skull is.. it's just so incredibly un-fun and unrealistic to just stand there blasting something in the head.
User avatar
james reed
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:18 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:30 am

"Arizona Killer" looks like we'll be visiting arizona.
User avatar
Becky Palmer
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:43 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:27 pm

"Arizona Killer" looks like we'll be visiting arizona.

Maybe its hinting at the Hanged Man/Burned Man?

It might just be wishful thinking on my part though. :tops:
User avatar
meg knight
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:20 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 6:53 am

Oh good.. that's exactly what I want.... .I'm really looking forward to sleeping, eating, ammo weight, blah blah... I just don't want it to take 500 rounds into somebodies head just to bring them down. I don't care how tough somethings skull is.. it's just so incredibly un-fun and unrealistic to just stand there blasting something in the head.


I just hope messing with the regular difficulty doesn't glitch out the hardcoe achievement, that would svck.

Unless the glitch was a Highwayman falling from the sky.
User avatar
Vicki Gunn
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:59 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:19 pm

I particularly like the ones involving raking up over 10,000 dmg points with each weapon type. Should be fun... They seem a little harder than the ones on F3 which is definitely a good thing.
User avatar
Brittany Abner
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:33 pm

hardcoe achievement is the only cool one, everything else seems pretty meh

Agreed. I think I will go hardcoe on my first playthroguh.
User avatar
Guinevere Wood
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:06 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:44 am

I still fail to see the importance of achievements after all this time. Who cares? What's the point of it? I mean, I like that the game can recognize what you do and give you a little title for it (Alpha Protocol did this excellently) but what is with the obsession of showing it off online?

I don't understand. :(
User avatar
Michelle Smith
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:03 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 9:41 am

I still fail to see the importance of achievements after all this time. Who cares? What's the point of it? I mean, I like that the game can recognize what you do and give you a little title for it (Alpha Protocol did this excellently) but what is with the obsession of showing it off online?

I don't understand. :(

Hey, Hey, Hey, shut up. Do you have ANY idea how hard it is to take the G.O.A.T in F3? It was HARD to take man, I mean, it was the second thing you do in the game, and you have to scroll up and down between four options. FOUR. :cryvaultboy:
User avatar
Kat Lehmann
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:24 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:52 am

There pathetic.
User avatar
Helen Quill
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:12 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 7:45 am

I still fail to see the importance of achievements after all this time. Who cares? What's the point of it? I mean, I like that the game can recognize what you do and give you a little title for it (Alpha Protocol did this excellently) but what is with the obsession of showing it off online?

I don't understand. :(


I have to say, i agree with this.
I buy games for personal enjoyment,i spend my money wisely when getting games.
I dont give a monkey's backside about gamer score etc....some people do ( each to thier own i suppose ),but i dont,i dont waste money on games to add to a game score.
In my opinion thats what games are not about.I've played so many playthroughs in fallout & oblivion i've lost count.I had a freind who had fallout 3,he got all the achievements then traded the game in,whats the point in that....he's missed out the point of the game in my view,just seems ridiculous.There is still achievements i have'nt got for fallout 3,& like i've said i've lost count on how many playthroughs i've done.I enjoy exploring,surviving,scavanging,fighting,reading about the history of the story etc....not running from one place to another just to get numbers added to more meaningless numbers.....i know people who have bought some shocking games ,just to get scores out of them,more money than sense in my view.

Anyway just my view :)
User avatar
Kari Depp
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:19 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 5:11 am

What's all this fuss about achievements? It's not like they have an impact on anything (or is it?).
User avatar
Charity Hughes
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:22 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas