» Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:46 am
Did I think it was just? No
Did I think he deserved to die? No, but there's no helping it, really.
Was he a hero? No, but he was a honorable man.
Before anyone goes flaming, let's clear up on what's happening here:
(From Sybile Stendor - The Imperial Suporter)
1. "Jarl" Ulfric come into a council meeting. Torygg and many council member.
2. Ulfric challenge Torygg to a deathmatch. In Nordic tradition, if Torygg refused, Ulfric can call a vote for the throne.
(Now the one detail that the Imperial picked on)
3. Ulfric's used Thu'um and slash away at Torygg.
-Stormcloak argument: Thu'um is an ancient Nordic art, considering that the duel is in Nordic tradition, this use is perfectly okay.
-Imperial argument: Use of Thu'um is a breach of the rule. Therefore forfeiting the duel and turned it into a murder.
4. Rogvir, being an honored Nord, let Ulfric go since he clearly fight fair and square.
(From here on is my personal anolysis)
5. The Imperial need Skyrim. So they turn Ulfric's duel into a murder, cause if they don't, Ulfric would gather many supporter and eventually frees Skyrim.
6. Rogvir, being a traitor for letting Ulfric go, is the only way to do it. Not only does his execution makes people believed that Ulfric murdered Torygg, it will also calm many people from the shock of losing a high king.
So Rogvir is just an unfortunate pawn (in fact, if he doesn't let Ulfric go and by some miracle the imperial failed to kill Ulfric, the imperial is in some big [censored]). Where his commander turned on him/his tradition that he hold onto. The one who executed him is just because they're doing this for the good of the empire (for the good of many). But he is an honorable man, for even if his leaders all turned against him and his tradition, he still stand strong even if it means certain death.