Stormcloaks or Legion?

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:51 pm

The empire being in charge certainly makes it easier for them. Ulfric's dossier says they don't want a Stormcloak victory. They probably see a rebellion as desirable because they assume the empire will win and in the meantime they can profit from the chaos. Though we don't know that they actually did anything to start it, only that they're taking credit for it after the fact. They also take credit for hanging the moons.
It seems being easier for them wasn't sufficient. As for taking credit, they never openly took credit for the civil war, but they did in secret. Likewise, if bringing back the moons was a hoax, the mention that they didn't is probably mentioned in some similarly secret documents in Alinor. They wouldn't lie to themselves. Or at least not to the higher-ups.
User avatar
Emma Parkinson
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:53 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:57 am

It seems being easier for them wasn't sufficient. As for taking credit, they never openly took credit for the civil war, but they did in secret. Likewise, if bringing back the moons was a hoax, the mention that they didn't is probably mentioned in some similarly secret documents in Alinor. They wouldn't lie to themselves. Or at least not to the higher-ups.
Because bureaucrats would never lie to their bosses? huhuhu
User avatar
Jake Easom
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:33 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:16 am

Because bureaucrats would never lie to their bosses? huhuhu
I doubt they would, but it's possible they'd lie to the low-ranked grunts. There's a theory going around that only the higher-ups in the Thalmor, who would include whoever wrote the Thalmor dossiers, are aware of the plan to undo the world, while the low-ranked soldiers and Dominion citizens only believe that the Thalmor are simply forcing elven superiority and the beliefs it encompasses on the rest of the world. The upper-ranked ones probably wouldn't lie to each other, at least not about important details about how their plans are brought about.
User avatar
Prisca Lacour
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:25 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:29 am

And...? Tullius knows about it and the Thalmor say they'll release him if the empire requests it. Not only will Tullius not request it, he orders a cover-up.
Yes, I am sure that Tullius will request that the Thalmor release a Stormcloak prisoner.
User avatar
michael flanigan
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:21 am

Yes, I am sure that Tullius will request that the Thalmor release a Stormcloak prisoner.

He isn't a stormcloak soldier.
User avatar
Sabrina Steige
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:51 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:49 pm

He isn't a stormcloak soldier.
But he was wearing a Stormcloak uniform. If he wasn't with the Stormcloaks he shouldn't have been wearing it in the first place.
The empire is suspicious enough if you're even near some Stormcloaks. I wouldn't be surprised if they treated him as a rebel.
User avatar
Jani Eayon
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:19 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:08 pm

But he was wearing a Stormcloak uniform. If he wasn't with the Stormcloaks he shouldn't have been wearing it in the first place.
The empire is suspicious enough if you're even near some Stormcloaks. I wouldn't be surprised if they treated him as a rebel.

I.... don't remember that he ever had a Stormcloak uniform. In the Keep, he's just in rags - and there's no Stormcloak uniform bits laying about. You never see him in Whiterun at all, so you can't say at that point. And when he says he can't go back to Whiterun, he then says he guesses he'll join the Stormcloaks. So whyever the Thalmor grabbed him, I don't think he was "really" a Stormcloak. A sympathizer probably, but not the real deal at whatever point they grabbed him.
User avatar
Bryanna Vacchiano
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:34 am

Yes, I am sure that Tullius will request that the Thalmor release a Stormcloak prisoner.
He's not a Stormcloak. After you free him, he says he's going to join the Stormcloaks because it's not safe for him to go home.

And he's wearing http://images.wikia.com/elderscrolls/images/b/bb/Thorald_Gray-Mane.jpg, not a uniform. Just like the dovahkiin at the beginning of the game, coincidentally. Tullius doesn't care if a few innocent Nords get tortured or executed. All in a day's work.
User avatar
Jonathan Windmon
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:23 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 4:34 am

After reading through all the posts since my last post, Celan seems to make a very, very valid argument. I re-thought out my Dunmer Characters thought processes and philosophy, and have come to the conclusion that the Stormcloaks themselves are not racist, as an organization. It's the individuals, and certain individuals, who are the racists. It's just like the real life. One should not blame an entire organization simply because one random guy says some dumb stuff in a drunken stupor.

As for the Empire, it is dying and rather in a long slow drawn out way. Ulfric sees that the only way to get out of the Empire right now, is to rebel and wake up the people of Skyrim to this fact. The Empire is in no way able to aid the provinces in either a war or natural disaster, ie Morrowind. Basically, (I believe it's the 4th Legion) the 4th Legion in Skyrim is a "show of force" unit to try and enforce Imperial Law, watch the Thalmor, and stop insurrection. It simply cannot do it. The entire Imperial military is spread beyond thin, almost to a breaking point.

As for the Dunmer, they certainly were invited to join in the rebellion, but as Dunmer are, they simply do not see it as a conflict that affects them. They only lost their homeland because of the largest Volcano in Tamriel decided it was time to wake up with a bang. However, I believe the Dunmer would join the Stormcloak cause had that volcano not errupted. I also believe, that given more time, that the Dunmer refugees would take the Stormcloak side only after they feel secure and feel accepted within the Skyrim society.

So, I now renounce my support to the Empire and the Thalmor. The Stormcloak cause is something I will take up simply because the old ways of the Empire are no longer something that the Empire holds to it's heart. I also believe Mede is a pretender, is incompetent, and will kill the Empire completely.

Also, the fact that they wanted to behead me (even though my last reasons in a previous post of mine still hold merit) for no other reason than because I was in the wrong place at the wrong time, gets under my skin the more I think about it.
User avatar
Samantha hulme
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:43 pm

He's not a Stormcloak. After you free him, he says he's going to join the Stormcloaks because it's not safe for him to go home.

And he's wearing http://images.wikia.com/elderscrolls/images/b/bb/Thorald_Gray-Mane.jpg, not a uniform. Just like the dovahkiin at the beginning of the game, coincidentally. Tullius doesn't care if a few innocent Nords get tortured or executed. All in a day's work.

Thanks for validating my fairly sketchy memories.... haven't done that quest in a while.
User avatar
Minako
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:50 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:29 pm

Both of these movements have faults and are "dying" unless someone purifies them and sets them on course. You can say that Stormcloaks aren't dying as "badly" as the Empire, but they have elements that make them off to a bad start anyhow. All of the arguments against them, how they probably won't fare well with these racist elements, or that they don't have the strength to combat Thalmor on their own is irrelevant. If you side with them, they suddenly have a dragonborn in their ranks. You can undo some of the bad crap too. But you can do this with the empire too. Siding with the Empire is not supporting the White Gold Concordat. That line of debate is pointless. Nor is it a lost cause - unless you consider yourself a lost cause. Then it is a lost cause.

They've set this up in a way where both roads basically lead down the same path. The only difference is whether you like the color blue or the color red.
User avatar
carla
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:36 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:17 pm

good read for the dunmer pov:
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Dunmer_of_Skyrim

So now, "children of Skyrim," you have the truth of it. You may call this province home, but you can no sooner claim to own it than a cow can claim to own its master's field. You are just another breed of domestic animal, grazing stupidly while higher beings plot your slaughter.

I know, I know - its only one dunmer. But just as valid to blame all dunmer for what he wrote as to blame all Nords for Rolff.
User avatar
Add Me
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:21 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 4:36 am

Well, you also have to take stuff on the wikis with a grain of salt.
User avatar
Shelby McDonald
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:29 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:23 pm

He's not a Stormcloak. After you free him, he says he's going to join the Stormcloaks because it's not safe for him to go home.

And he's wearing http://images.wikia.com/elderscrolls/images/b/bb/Thorald_Gray-Mane.jpg, not a uniform. Just like the dovahkiin at the beginning of the game, coincidentally. Tullius doesn't care if a few innocent Nords get tortured or executed. All in a day's work.
Avulstein Gray-Mane says that Thorald was fighting for the Stormcloaks when he went missing.
User avatar
casey macmillan
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:37 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:05 pm

The whole Greymane/Battleborn thing is a big lost opportunity imo. They should've had a sort of "Montague/Capulet" sub-plot in Whiterun (with Jon and Olfina as Romeo and Juliet.. perhaps let them die in a double sucide too. Heh).
User avatar
Stephanie Kemp
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:39 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:22 am

Well, you also have to take stuff on the wikis with a grain of salt.

Dunmer of Skyrim is a book in game. if that was in reference to my post.
User avatar
Dina Boudreau
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:59 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:37 pm

Dunmer of Skyrim is a book in game. if that was in reference to my post.

Yes, it was. The books in the game are NOT VERACIOUS. Not truth. They're written by people some of us don't even know from DAGGERFALL for cats'sakes. Most of them are... "flavor". That's it. Do NOT take them as anything but fiction.
User avatar
danni Marchant
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:32 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:05 pm

Uh, books in TES more or less function like books do in the real world. There's fiction, there's non-fiction (which doesn't necessarily mean they're entirely true), there's everything inbetween. In this case it details the view of the Dunmer author.
User avatar
stevie critchley
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:36 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:15 pm

Uh, books in TES more or less function like books do in the real world. There's fiction, there's non-fiction (which doesn't necessarily mean they're entirely true), there's everything inbetween. In this case it details the view of the Dunmer author.

Right. I'm juggling too many things right now to make sense. Thank you.
User avatar
Emma Louise Adams
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:22 am

Some of it is intended to be reporting on facts, but facts and history as a discipline are always iffy. No one ever really knows in the real world, unless it was a blatant event. For example, no one really knows how someone as recent as "Pol Pot" died. He was a notorious tyrant with a relatively global eye on his whereabouts, and we don't even know if he died of natural causes or was poisoned. Same thing goes for Napoleon. Sometimes a report comes about from an eyewitness, but then.. no one knows whether to believe them either.
User avatar
Jhenna lee Lizama
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:48 am

When someone writes an opinion you can generally be certain that it truly is his opinion. The book was about what that dunmer thought about Nords. There is no reason to doubt that that is what he really thought.
User avatar
ijohnnny
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:15 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:12 am

Avulstein Gray-Mane says that Thorald was fighting for the Stormcloaks when he went missing.
He does, you're right. Tullius could at least ask to have him transferred to legion custody rather than tortured by the Thalmor. But as the beginning of the game shows, he's not all that concerned with imperial law.
User avatar
Genocidal Cry
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:33 pm

That is not why Tullius doesn't free him. He says having a prisoner freed would cause major trouble for the Empire.
User avatar
josie treuberg
 
Posts: 3572
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:56 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:02 am

I admit that is a black mark for Gen. Tullius, but I don't chalk it up to cruelty or cowardice, rather his willingness to 'bide his time' and defeat the uprising, rebuild the legions, and prepare for eventually war with the Thalmor. It's not right by any means, but it's the explaination, given what we see of his personality, makes the most sense.
User avatar
KIng James
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:54 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:13 am

That is not why Tullius doesn't free him. He says having a prisoner freed would cause major trouble for the Empire.
Milk drinking politicians.
User avatar
Sudah mati ini Keparat
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:14 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim