Or You running away from the fact that im right and you want to attempt to make it look good that your actually running away.

my point has been proven by your own post, good job. no one's running away, as this little argument has already been squashed.

Thought your were done with this thread? ANd no my argument was not sqaushed, Your arguement that skyrim dlc would not be radically differnt, But the size and amount of dlc were getting is radically differnt, so i just proved your point wrong "Good sir"

Look at the screenshot http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/600/lycantrppy.png Looks like a skill,he can increase it and spends perks on it.. Level 81 in lychantropy

your logic and reasoning is so strawman that i'm actually baffled at how to even respond LOL. No. your point was not proven. you are using completely irrational logic to make your point, which is based on assumptions and conjecture. you are "assuming" that the CONTENT of the dlc will be radically different. that is not proving a point. that is proving you have an opinion and a hunch. nothing more. please learn the difference.

Actually MW did have free small add-ons for PC.

edit: details of them here http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Morrowind:Official_Plug-ins

You saying my logic is flawed? Howbout yours, you assume just because it was not in previous Tes games its not gonna be here? Marriage was not in previous tes games and its in Skyrim, No good sir you have the flawed logic.

PC, Consoles did not get them.(They twisted it around for Oblivion it seems, Horse armour...)

if anyone said "hey, I think that there's going to be marriage in skyrim" before beth announced that it WAS going to be in, YES, his argument would have been an OPINION, are you legit like 12 years old? how can you not understand these simple concepts of facts and opinion? you have no physical or word of mouth proof that there is going to be some radical changes in future dlc for skyrim concerning content, therefore you have an OPINION based on conjecture. for the love of God dude.

Yeah to get perk points, it has to be a kind of "skill". I guess the more time you spend as a werewolf doing werewolf stuff, the better you get at...being a werewolf. Which would make some sort of sense - a veteran werewolf should be more experienced than a noob. So the player would have to transform regularly to build experience in werewolfery.

Are you a twelve years old? Todd howard himself says that dlc is going to be differnt, and stop using fancy words to hide your flawed logic, I know how to play word games also.

fancy words..? what threw you off, "facts"? because you apparently don't know what that means, because you have presented 0. todd said *nothing* concerning the content of the dlc. please, quote me where todd said anything referring to the content of dlc's. i asked once, and you quoted me an out of context statement regarding the SIZE and frequency of the dlc. frequency means how often, btw.

Which makes me think - why not give vampires the love? I've always cured myself of vampirism pronto because it seems such a waste of time. A vampire perk tree could have, say, resistance to sunlight, a perk that reduces/eliminates vulnerability to fire, bolsters spells. Vampirism 100 = vampire lord.
Go on bethesda - a vampire perk tree could make vampirism worthwhile.

frequency itself is gonna to be differnt then previous Tes games. Im saying this as a whole that Dlc is gonna to Be DIFFFERNT.

And the quote is from atleast march ill find it for you While i look for it i would like to hear other peoples opinion on this "Debate".

Pot, meet kettle. You know no more than anyone else, so stop trying to act like you do. It's better to have people think you're an idiot, than to open your mouth and prove them right. Stop typing.

The funny thing is the guy said he was done with this thread atleast 10 posts ago...

... I know... I meant that it would have been nice for Bethesda who was the publisher to give Obsidian this support since they screwed them over with the original deadline.

[edit]

"What do you mean screwed them over?"
They gave Obsidian a very short deadline and they ended up having to cut a lot of stuff just to meet it and then the game when it came out was really buggy. (And Bethesda handled the QA)
Bethesda had the choice to postpone the release date a couple of months so that Obsidian could have met the deadline with all the planned content but chose not to.

Yet with Skyrim they had what? 3 to 5 years to develop the game and now they're gonna release at least 2 expansions and continue to support it through and through with more content?

New Vegas was not finished, and they could have post poned it's release date but didn't.
J.E Sawyer said he wanted to add 3 more Legion locations but couldn't. Imagine if Bethesda had given this support to Obsidian about post-release content?

..except that i'm not arguing that the dlc is going to be a certain way, i'm arguing that you do NOT know how the dlc is GONIG TO BE. incorrect use of the pot meet kettle, sorry.

You dont know also, he is right, you think the Dlc is going to the same as previous Tes games, I think its going to be way differnt, this Clash of Idelogy is pointless, I cant sway you, you cant sway me, its that simple.

..except that no, i have never said I think dlc is going to be a certain way. you have. i've said "you have no proof behind that statement, just an opinion". i've never said anything more, or anything less. you have an opinion that you have no proof for that you insist your opinions are fact. that's what i'm arguing against. i have *never* made a statement regarding how the dlc will be.

Hm... Okay... Would have been nice for New Vegas to get this treament so that we could have gotten a Legion expansion..

Different team, different project. That being said, I think Obsidian offered some pretty compelling content for New Vegas.

We can't wait to share more of what we're working on for Skyrim.

Sounds good to me.

mind quoting something in context of me saying the dlc will include any specific content? i simply said the skills we have won't change. try again.