Where are the gay couples in Skyrim?

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:18 pm

I agree there should be more gayness in this game.

Very disappointed about the lack of Assless Chaps light armor and dual-enchanted nipble Rings. :down:
User avatar
Mimi BC
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:30 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:15 pm

There is a difference between "Allowing things to occur", and "Making them occur"...

Allowing it to occur, it is not forcing it upon you, and giving you control. (For those who want it.)

Making it occur, is forcing it upon you, even if you choose not to participate in it. (Having couples already gay-wed as NPC's, forces that "opinion" on the player. They can not avoid the situation.)
So... Why kids are immortal then?
User avatar
hannah sillery
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:13 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:40 am

I know what you're getting at, but I just don't think Bethesda would ever care about catering towards kids that might play this game since they're not even supposed to be playing it in the first place.
Bethesda has been intentionally "streamlining" games way below the level of an average human being. And that means that either I am overestimating humanity or Bethesda does indeed target kids (And their parent's wallets) despite whatever they say.
User avatar
Brιonα Renae
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:10 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:42 pm

I agree there should be more gayness in this game.

Very disappointed about the lack of Assless Chaps light armor and dual-enchanted nipble Rings. :down:
What the hell do assless chaps and nipble rings have to do with homosixuality?
User avatar
djimi
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:44 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:08 am

Also, you're mixing game-play mechanics with lore. We aren't supposed to believe that there wasn't a single horse in Vvanderfell, people in Cyrodiil wasn't able to dual wield or that children in Skyrim are inmortal. It's just a feature.
User avatar
sexy zara
 
Posts: 3268
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:53 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:23 am

What the hell do assless chaps and nipble rings have to do with homosixuality?

You must've never lived through the 70's/80's and visited S&M dungeons.

Not that I have or anything.
User avatar
Emily Martell
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:41 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:57 am

I'm not sure what history books you were reading, but they were. At least until the Church started condemning it, largely in an effort to get people to breed more members of the Church. As I said though, it was common practice to get married and have children as a duty to your clan and family, even if you were not attracted to the opposite six.

You do understand that the Bible was written before midieval times right? There were these little towns talked about in the Old Testament. Sodom and Gamorah? They were destroyed because, well... it's where the word sodomized comes from.
User avatar
Kim Bradley
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:00 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:15 am

You do understand that the Bible was written before midieval times right? There were these little towns talked about in the Old Testament. Sodom and Gamorah? They were destroyed because, well... it's where the word sodomized comes from.
Except it was translated and edited so many times, it's contents can be interpreted in any way possible.
User avatar
Kirsty Collins
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:54 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 4:33 pm

Very disappointed about the lack of Assless Chaps light armor and dual-enchanted nipble Rings. :down:

As long as there are female versions or equivalents of such, i approve! :lmao:
User avatar
Farrah Lee
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:32 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:41 am

You do understand that the Bible was written before midieval times right? There were these little towns talked about in the Old Testament. Sodom and Gamorah? They were destroyed because, well... it's where the word sodomized comes from.

The Bible is not a historical document, it is a religious one. The people of Sodom were not punished for being gay, they were punished for being anti-social jerks, which in that culture and time was a grave sin, not being gay which was not uncommon. There is more to the world than just Europe, and even then the Roman Empire can certainly be considered 'mideval', even if it wasn't a Catholic Church led Europe.
User avatar
Crystal Clarke
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:55 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:23 pm

If I had to guess the fact that you can marry the same gender is more about them not bothering to put a limitation on it, rather than making it a playstyle directed toward people of different sixual preferences.
User avatar
neen
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:19 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:30 pm

yh. I was going to make a mention how the Dunmer voices sound so daft in this game. The new races look great but compare the Dunmer voices of Morrowind to that of Skyrim

I personally would rather hear more Asian sounding accents on the Elven races to set them apart from the European / Middle Eastern sounding human races.




Normal as in two people coming together to raise a family (without the need for adoption). I thought it was greatly about introducing children into Skyrim. Most the NPC couples also have children.

I'm sure there are others in the game who are "gay" but Bethesda doesn't feel cheapened to have to broadcast it. I don't see anyone broadcasting the fact they are straight.

For all we know, the two ladies in the Thieves Guild bar are gay. There could be priests that are gay... who cares??!!
what does adoption have to do with being normal.......so does tha mean a man and woman who cant have children and then adopt.....thats not a normal family?
User avatar
Jade Payton
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:01 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:42 pm

Bethesda has been intentionally "streamlining" games way below the level of an average human being. And that means that either I am overestimating humanity or Bethesda does indeed target kids (And their parent's wallets) despite whatever they say.

I personally feel like that's Bethesda making things more accessible for a different audience in order to expand their user base. With Skyrim, they're trying to pull in the audience that doesn't care about or want to be bothered with heavy customization and player choices and all that jazz. The people who just want to start up the game, plow through the story, kill lots of dragons, and move on to the next game. I wouldn't say those people are inherently stupid; they just view video games differently and have different taste. I know people like that in real life that are definitely not unintelligent.
User avatar
Lil Miss
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:57 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:12 am

Yes and don't forget to include horny lisbians, bdsn and all the spices of the planet Earth, don't let out any minorities. UFO worshipers are a must.
User avatar
Lance Vannortwick
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:38 pm

Both of those statements are demonstrably wrong.
I agree with the rest of your post though.
Now that I think of it, you might be right.
Maybe I'm thinking more of the TES series as a whole, with traditional fantasy settings that never seem to take notice of homosixuality. It doesn't really affect the player - we can still make choices for our characters. I don't believe we NEED to have gay people in the game to know that homosixuality is accepted. I don't believe meeting them everywhere we go would be realistic.
Or maybe I just have to much of the "why change what's not broken" attitude ;)

On a side note, even in ancient Rome being homosixual was okay only as long as you were the active side. Assuming the passive role was infamia for a free citizen. Freeborn Romans could openly have male lovers, but those lovers were usually slaves or non-Romans.

Sodoma and Gomorrah are tricky, many view homosixuality as their sin, but it that particular case their cruelty and lack of hospitality was the real problem. Sodomites commiter many other sins: economic crimes, blasphemy, bloodshed. Homosixuality was only one of many. The story stresses that Lot's angelic guests should have been protected and untouchable, but the citizens of Sodoma violated this right.
User avatar
Cat Haines
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:27 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:56 pm

They took an arrow in the knee :]
User avatar
April
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:33 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:34 pm

Maybe there are some gay couples. They just don't go "Did we tell you "we are a gay" today?!"

I like Komodo Saurian. (I'll leave it up to you decide what I mean by 'like'.)
User avatar
e.Double
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:17 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:48 pm


Except it was translated and edited so many times, it's contents can be interpreted in any way possible.

I'm not going to get into a religious debate on the Skyrim forum, just like the OP shouldn't take their political agenda to the Skyrim forum. I find it a lazy way for them to feel like they're furthering their cause. Actually go out and do something about it.

Or I suppose put them in and if people don't want homosixuals in the game, they can kill them. Would this be the direction you would want to go? No, I think Bethesda did the safe thing and kept it out of the game. They should've played it safer and taken the whole marriage system out. Just showing you it could be a lot worse than it is.
User avatar
Francesca
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:26 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:24 pm

there will never be a time when a thread like this does not evolve into a irl debate
User avatar
Stat Wrecker
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:14 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:17 pm

I give this thread to page 6 before it gets shut down for one reason or another.
User avatar
Josee Leach
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:50 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:24 pm

Well the marriage system was not up for the debate. It was the lack of obvious homosixual NPC couples. I think it would have been nice, but I don't see that as a requirement. As far as 'we can't show gay couples because then the ultra conservative haters will hate!'. Well, that's life... Gay people exist, they have families. Burying your head in the sand or boycotting a game won't make it go away... Might as well just accept it. Nobody is 'forcing' it on you anymore than heterosixual couples are 'forcing' their straightness on gay people just by existing.
User avatar
NAkeshIa BENNETT
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:23 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:26 pm

B: Many ancient civilizations were fine with this like the Romans, and Feudal Japan. In many places being gay was the more honorable path until Catholic Britain started to spread it's influence.

They were still expected to procreate with members of the opposite six, whether or not they liked it was irrelevant. In fact the rather sixist view of those societies was that women were for making babies and wifely duties, while other men were for love and romance - "what woman can ever be an equal to a man?" They would wonder. So while they didn't have gay marriages, they did have gay romances.
User avatar
Claudia Cook
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:22 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:48 am

So... Why kids are immortal then?

They are immortal, for the same reason... They don't want to be guilted into "making them something you might kill", if only on accident... (In addition to the legal and social issues, related to killing children.)

Funny, they are not children, they are vectors of light, emanating from my screen... I kill them, every time I turn off the computer... They no-longer LIVE! lol.

PREVIOUS POSTERS:... (Comments below go to them.)
"Normal"... Normal is NOT "Average"... Average implies that there are high's and low's. Thus, Average = Gay & Hetero & Hermits... If it can be done, it is "NORMAL", if it usually CAN NOT be done, that is "ABNORMAL", if YOU don't want it done, that is an "OPINION".

As for the posters saying, "This is medieval times..." Yea, and same-six relations were not only "Normal", but they were even encouraged in many places. Thus, the strong need for social-control to throw anti-gay junk in bibles, and scare idiots with fear of being burned in hell. (That was to reduce the obvious spreading of promiscuous disease spreading, where "marriages" were not being practiced. Same-six marriages were possible, and frequent. Just not in the edited history-books you were force-fed as a child, in your public and private schools.

Marriage was invented to resolve issues with insecurities, and promote "a better way of life", for reproduction. Love had noting to do with marriage. That has, and still is, optional in many countries. It was about property, possession, insecurity, and dominance. Love is what made it unique and last longer, longer than "toleration and fear", yet that still plays a major role in all relationships. Though, the reality of "a better way of life", is far from the reality of what is preached or practiced. Since many kids and spouses, "are together", in abusive, destructive, and "worse off", than they would be alone, or being separated.

But I digress... Don't let the "game fantasy" destroy your "reality fantasy"... There is no spoon!
User avatar
Sebrina Johnstone
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:58 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:20 am

I give this thread to page 6 before it gets shut down for one reason or another.

Its getting there; since the bible got brought up again :laugh:

What the heck does Christianity have to do with TES lore anyway?
User avatar
Dylan Markese
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:58 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:37 pm

Its getting there; since the bible got brought up again :laugh:

What the heck does Christianity have to do with TES lore anyway?
absolutley nothing to do with it at all....i give it till page 7 but just barely
User avatar
Leah
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:11 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim