So, where exactly does BGS get off?.. : V

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:24 pm

With this 1600 MSP [censored]? We waited 8 months just to get word of any info whatsoever..

Get this amazing sneak peak trailer, which made me extremely, EXTREMELY excited! Then I happen to go over to the "Details" about the video and it states just that.

I myself haven't personally been here in a long, long time because my Laptop recently died on me. But once I saw this atrocity.. I had to say something.

So, why exactly are we paying DOUBLE what we normally do for your add-ons? I'm hella curious...

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:09 pm

Size.

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:54 pm

I can give you a hundred reasons, but the most prominent one is that its Bethesda for gods sake. Their work deserves to be that much, hell I've never played a stupid $60 game like COD for over 400 hours. That's why.

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 4:52 am

I think the price is based off of size of content, that is a pure guess and nothing else so I cant say for sure. personally I dont mind that much because Bethesda has a history of making the DLC very enjoyable (98% of the time in my opinion).

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:14 pm

With this 1600 MSP [censored]? We waited 8 months just to get word of any info whatsoever..

Get this amazing sneak peak trailer, which made me extremely, EXTREMELY excited! Then I happen to go over to the "Details" about the video and it states just that.

I myself haven't personally been here in a long, long time because my Laptop recently died on me. But once I saw this atrocity.. I had to say something.

So, why exactly are we paying DOUBLE what we normally do for your add-ons? I'm hella curious...

Cheaper than Shivering Isles, but more expensive than the Fallout 3 expansions, makes me think the size and scope of the DLC lies somewhere in between the two.

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:58 am

Inflation

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:42 pm

Mi￠ro$oft and/or Bethesda.

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:23 pm

I think the price is based off of size of content, that is a pure guess and nothing else so I cant say for sure. personally I dont mind that much because Bethesda has a history of making the DLC very enjoyable (98% of the time in my opinion).

Obviously, did anyone see how big each castle looks? Clearly these have to be a far ways away and if you can get to both by walking imagine how big the area is..

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 1:05 am

Why does everyone jump on the thought it's all because they're money hungry?

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:05 pm

Size.

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:26 pm

This is less of a DLC, and more of an expansion if I'm not mistaken. That being said, it's cheaper than what I remember paying for Shivering Isles.

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 3:39 am

Cheaper than Shivering Isles, but more expensive than the Fallout 3 expansions, makes me think the size and scope of the DLC lies somewhere in between the two.

All I have to say is if it's costing us that much, this map better be bigger then Skyrims. NO LIE.

From what i've seen so far it might be HALF the size of Skyrim. I just don't get it.. I imagined ppl would be furious with rage right about now after seeing that (almost like me).

Like I said, map better be bigger then Skyrims or you better have me in Dawnguard for AT LEAST 200 hrs. (very minimal I'll accept)

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 2:30 am

Shivering Isles was 2400 MSP, that would have given you a heart attack.

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:43 pm

All I have to say is if it's costing us that much, this map better be bigger then Skyrims. NO LIE.

From what i've seen so far it might be HALF the size of Skyrim. I just don't get it.. I imagined ppl would be furious with rage right about now after seeing that (almost like me).

Like I said, map better be bigger then Skyrims or you better have me in Dawnguard for AT LEAST 200 hrs. (very minimal I'll accept)

uh.. I have to buy a new card anyway so I'll have enough.. sooo why do I care?

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 1:09 am

I see no problem in it being 20 bucks. Pretty decently sized chunck of land with new cool stuff and features. Not only it adds more of the same but also new stuff in order to improve/add more flavor to the game.

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 4:27 am

All I have to say is if it's costing us that much, this map better be bigger then Skyrims. NO LIE.

From what i've seen so far it might be HALF the size of Skyrim. I just don't get it.. I imagined ppl would be furious with rage right about now after seeing that (almost like me).

Like I said, map better be bigger then Skyrims or you better have me in Dawnguard for AT LEAST 200 hrs. (very minimal I'll accept)

Bigger than Skyrim? For like half the price or less?
Out of DLC? No lie? Swear down?

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:51 pm

All I have to say is if it's costing us that much, this map better be bigger then Skyrims. NO LIE.

From what i've seen so far it might be HALF the size of Skyrim. I just don't get it.. I imagined ppl would be furious with rage right about now after seeing that (almost like me).

Like I said, map better be bigger then Skyrims or you better have me in Dawnguard for AT LEAST 200 hrs. (very minimal I'll accept)

Skyrim cost 3 times the amount Dawnguard does. How does it makes sense that an ADD-ON is bigger than the original game but not as expensive?

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 6:07 pm

Shivering Isles was 2400 MSP, that would have given you a heart attack.

lol, you got to love those that post without thought. :biggrin:

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:50 pm

All I have to say is if it's costing us that much, this map better be bigger then Skyrims. NO LIE.

From what i've seen so far it might be HALF the size of Skyrim. I just don't get it.. I imagined ppl would be furious with rage right about now after seeing that (almost like me).

Like I said, map better be bigger then Skyrims or you better have me in Dawnguard for AT LEAST 200 hrs. (very minimal I'll accept)

It won't be half the size of Skyrim that′s for sure. Was said somewhere it would probably be as big as Point Lookout.

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:08 pm

It is expensive but I thought Microsoft did all the pricing?

But by the sheer size of the 3 different places (two castles/graveyard) I think the DLC will be worth it

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 5:47 am

Because Bethesda is a real-life company and it has to make a profit?

Besides, I'd happily pay more for the DLC!

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 5:58 am

With this 1600 MSP [censored]? We waited 8 months just to get word of any info whatsoever..

Get this amazing sneak peak trailer, which made me extremely, EXTREMELY excited! Then I happen to go over to the "Details" about the video and it states just that.

I myself haven't personally been here in a long, long time because my Laptop recently died on me. But once I saw this atrocity.. I had to say something.

So, why exactly are we paying DOUBLE what we normally do for your add-ons? I'm hella curious...

This isn't a [censored] CoD map-pack dude. This is basicly a medium sized expansion pack, which will probably (if I know beth well enough) add at least 35 hours of playtime. Even more if you do everything

» Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:01 pm

It won't be half the size of Skyrim that′s for sure. Was said somewhere it would probably be as big as Point Lookout.

And that was my favourite Fallout 3 DLC. Lets hope it's either that or a little bigger.

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 3:07 am

All I have to say is if it's costing us that much, this map better be bigger then Skyrims. NO LIE.

From what i've seen so far it might be HALF the size of Skyrim. I just don't get it.. I imagined ppl would be furious with rage right about now after seeing that (almost like me).

Like I said, map better be bigger then Skyrims or you better have me in Dawnguard for AT LEAST 200 hrs. (very minimal I'll accept)

What? If the price is less than what Skyrim cost then it's map needs to be bigger than Skyrims? I don't think your math works right.

» Fri Jun 15, 2012 5:55 am

Obviously, did anyone see how big each castle looks? Clearly these have to be a far ways away and if you can get to both by walking imagine how big the area is..

If there is a new area :3 might take place in skyrim+molag bals realm,but thats a new area.