Dragon Age: Origins

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 11:53 pm

There are different types of "bad" for the record. None of those leaders possessed all of the qualities a leader must have for it's nation to flourish. Sure you can make do, but ultimately alone they were all flawed in some way as rulers.

Anora was way to harsh and unforgiving. She will not earn the loyalty or respect of her people alone.
Cailan was a moron, and while he would be loved. He would make political blunder after blunder.
Logaihn was so racist and traditionalist that he would see his country die before he seen change.

These particular qualities are all extra crippling for a leader to not posses. I kind of liked how the Dev's showed this.

Anora and Cailan were probably the most effective working together. All it would take though is just one of them dieing and the system falls apart.

Like I said they all lacked a fundamental quality necessary for a truly inspiring and good leader. Sure you can call it human, but I call shenanigans. :P

Fair points, I agree neither Loghain nor Cailan were capable enough to lead Ferelden on their own. But Anora, while admittedly being somewhat heart-less at times, would have made a decent Queen on her own. She wouldn't have captured the hearts of the people, but would have had enough political know-how that she wouldn't necessarily need it.

I should point out that I haven't played the game properly in a little while so if I'm missing a big piece of evidence then please point it out. :P
User avatar
sunny lovett
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:59 am

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 10:38 pm

"Saving content. Do not turn off your system." FFS!! Every time I walk somewhere the game pauses for 5 seconds and then I have to endure a bloody great 'saving content' logo filling up the screen. It's getting annoying :lol:
User avatar
He got the
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:19 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 10:28 am

"Saving content. Do not turn off your system." FFS!! Every time I walk somewhere the game pauses for 5 seconds and then I have to endure a bloody great 'saving content' logo filling up the screen. It's getting annoying :lol:

You can turn it off. But yeah, it is annoying. :)
User avatar
Marnesia Steele
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:11 pm

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 11:25 pm

Fair points, I agree neither Loghain nor Cailan were capable enough to lead Ferelden on their own. But Anora, while admittedly being somewhat heart-less at times, would have made a decent Queen on her own. She wouldn't have captured the hearts of the people, but would have had enough political know-how that she wouldn't necessarily need it.

I should point out that I haven't played the game properly in a little while so if I'm missing a big piece of evidence then please point it out. :P

Oh there is no doubt she would be a good queen for herself and Ferelden. It's just the people who would suffer under such a strict tyrant. Look at how she handled Alister. Can you say "off to the gallows" for even the most petty offense?
User avatar
Brooke Turner
 
Posts: 3319
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:13 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 1:01 am

...Why?

Not being a smart-ass, I don't actually know what they did to the Elves. :P

Elven alienages = ghettos + regular purges to keep the population "in check".

At least King Alistair alievates their condition... and even
Spoiler
makes a City Elf PC Bann of the Alienage

User avatar
Samantha Wood
 
Posts: 3286
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:03 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 12:12 am

Elven alienages = ghettos + regular purges to keep the population "in check".

At least King Alistair alievates their condition... and even
Spoiler
makes a City Elf PC Bann of the Alienage

I actually like how DA makes elves the biggest losers in existence.
User avatar
Liv Staff
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:51 pm

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 10:25 pm

Elven alienages = ghettos + regular purges to keep the population "in check".

Spoiler
At least King Alistair alievates their condition... and even makes a City Elf PC Bann of the Alienage

Eh, what she did was really no different than what the rest of the world has been treating the Elves. The Antivans and Orlesians keep them around as "personal servants" to be used however they like. The Tevinter use them as slaves and fodder for their Blood Magic rituals. And the Qunari just slaughter the lot of them. No matter where they are, Elves are always on the bottom rung, considered no better than animals and commodities to be used and abused. As sad as their condition is, Fereldan could potentially benefit from her rule (in one ending,
Spoiler
she commences the building of a university
). The Elves are just too minor a population for a monarch to give any focus on, no one gives a damn about them, and Anora, as someone who's always looking at the bigger picture (or so she says) never has a reason to be sympathetic to their plight. :(

Still hate her guts. And her daddy's.
Spoiler
And I made sure to remove them both from power permanently
. :chaos:
User avatar
Chloe Lou
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:08 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 1:02 am

Still hate her guts. And her daddy's.
Spoiler
And I made sure to remove them both from power permanently
. :chaos:

My preferred ending as well,
Spoiler
although I've sometimes made her queen, if I feel like hanging with Alistair and rebuilding the Gray Wardens.
:D

I think she and Cailan together probably made a decent ruling pair - no worse than some historical precendents in our own world history. Alone, I think she would also generally be fine - she's smart and ambitious and *wants* the job, and tries to rule, as opposed to just inheriting the role and going about it half-assedly, or leaving decisions up to others. She's just so... annoying. :lol: Loghain as a ruler is too narrow, to set in his ways, too tied to his past - his concept of ruling is "No outsiders, and my-way-or-the-highway" basically - usually not a hallmark of your more forward-thinking rulers. I think that
Spoiler
a "hardened" Alistair would make a decent ruler, but would rely a fair amount on his advisors, who, if they were the Gray Warden as a friend, and Eamon, isn't a bad combination. Alistair with a smart female human noble as the consort - as good a combo as Anora and Cailin - stuff that needs to get done, will get done.

User avatar
chirsty aggas
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:23 am

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 9:49 pm

I thought Anora would be the worst ruler out of all of them. Mainly because she wanted the power, and thus is the one most likely to abuse that power. Not to mention she is ruthless and wouldn't know what mercy was if someone wrote a book on it, and then slapped her in the face with it. Sure she would see herself and Ferelden prosper, at the cost of Ferelden. :rolleyes:
User avatar
Bambi
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:20 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 1:28 am

I must say, at least my Dalish Elf got a very good deal in the ending with Anora. I imagine it would be the same for my City Elf. So at least she's true to her word.
User avatar
TOYA toys
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 12:01 am

I thought Anora would be the worst ruler out of all of them. Mainly because she wanted the power, and thus is the one most likely to abuse that power. Not to mention she is ruthless and wouldn't know what mercy was if someone wrote a book on it, and then slapped her in the face with it. Sure she would see herself and Ferelden prosper, at the cost of Ferelden. :rolleyes:

I actually think she would be the best in the aspect of getting things done. She may like power, but that doesn't mean she would be a tyrant or anything.
User avatar
Lawrence Armijo
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:12 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 4:41 am

Oh there is no doubt she would be a good queen for herself and Ferelden. It's just the people who would suffer under such a strict tyrant. Look at how she handled Alister. Can you say "off to the gallows" for even the most petty offense?

Disagree completely. Anora panics and turns on you immediately in the prison rescue, no concept of fighting it out, trust in her own power (you and your colleagues are a match for the forces arraigned against you). She would have been an extremely weak queen if she did this at the first sign of danger. Given her complete lack of military tactics she would have been a hopelessly undermined ruler, at the mercy of generals, or destructive as she executed and disgraced one after the other. In that time and place, you need not only a clever woman in power, but one who can lead on the battlefield too. Plenty in Ferelden can do that, but not Anora.
User avatar
Emma Parkinson
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:53 pm

Post » Thu May 26, 2011 11:08 pm

Disagree completely. Anora panics and turns on you immediately in the prison rescue, no concept of fighting it out, trust in her own power (you and your colleagues are a match for the forces arraigned against you). She would have been an extremely weak queen if she did this at the first sign of danger. Given her complete lack of military tactics she would have been a hopelessly undermined ruler, at the mercy of generals, or destructive as she executed and disgraced one after the other. In that time and place, you need not only a clever woman in power, but one who can lead on the battlefield too. Plenty in Ferelden can do that, but not Anora.

Pffft. You can't fool us - we know you are proudly wearing your Anora Fan Club badge and tee-shirt. :P
User avatar
electro_fantics
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 5:02 am

Anora panics and turns on you immediately in the prison rescue, no concept of fighting it out, trust in her own power (you and your colleagues are a match for the forces arraigned against you). She would have been an extremely weak queen if she did this at the first sign of danger. Given her complete lack of military tactics she would have been a hopelessly undermined ruler, at the mercy of generals, or destructive as she executed and disgraced one after the other. In that time and place, you need not only a clever woman in power, but one who can lead on the battlefield too. Plenty in Ferelden can do that, but not Anora.

I think that's just another case of dubious BioWare writing.
User avatar
Tinkerbells
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 10:22 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 3:17 am

I actually think she would be the best in the aspect of getting things done. She may like power, but that doesn't mean she would be a tyrant or anything.

Right, because executing Alister for no good reason as soon as your made ruler is an oh so fair and smart thing to do. :rolleyes:

Then her complete lack of ability to lead on the battlefield is even worse! No one can scheme perfectly forever, she is eventually going to mess up and be unable to stop what threats might appear. Not to mention she betrays people for a dime practically. I wouldn't be surprised that through all of her sneaky double dealings and political know how get her a ton of enemies to conspire against her. She has no one to balance out her sneaky tendencies and put her on an honest path.

Honestly, it's the dishonest ones you can honestly trust to be dishonest. In the short term she would be incredibly effective, but as people learn to deal with her the chances of them all conspiring to take her down grows. Even worse since she treats people like dirt she doesn't have a lot of loyal people willing to save her. Just making it even easier for someone to kill her.

She may seem like the most skillful at ruling, but that is just on a brief glance. She has no... compassion or sense of civic duty. It's all about her, and her ability to be politically savvy. She doesn't seem the type to give a crap about people, and she is surprised Alister let her live when she wouldn't. Like I said, ultimately flawed. We have nothing but evidence to show she is a ruthless ice queen [censored] who would probably sell out some of Ferelden to get herself ahead.

Ultimately like I said all three leaders were flawed, and even when Anora and Cailan were together they were STILL flawed in the fact that taking out either one would bring down their rule around them. There was no single strong leader possessing all of the skills necessary to be a truly great and exemplar of a King or Queen. At least not in this game, and even Alister still falls short. Although that's the angle they were going for though. No one is perfect and all that. It would be neat to see a character that does have all the good qualities of a King though.
User avatar
Everardo Montano
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:23 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 8:50 am

Right, because executing Alister for no good reason as soon as your made ruler is an oh so fair and smart thing to do. :rolleyes:

Then her complete lack of ability to lead on the battlefield is even worse! No one can scheme perfectly forever, she is eventually going to mess up and be unable to stop what threats might appear. Not to mention she betrays people for a dime practically. I wouldn't be surprised that through all of her sneaky double dealings and political know how get her a ton of enemies to conspire against her. She has no one to balance out her sneaky tendencies and put her on an honest path.

Honestly, it's the dishonest ones you can honestly trust to be dishonest. In the short term she would be incredibly effective, but as people learn to deal with her the chances of them all conspiring to take her down grows. Even worse since she treats people like dirt she doesn't have a lot of loyal people willing to save her. Just making it even easier for someone to kill her.

She may seem like the most skillful at ruling, but that is just on a brief glance. She has no... compassion or sense of civic duty. It's all about her, and her ability to be politically savvy. She doesn't seem the type to give a crap about people, and she is surprised Alister let her live when she wouldn't. Like I said, ultimately flawed. We have nothing but evidence to show she is a ruthless ice queen [censored] who would probably sell out some of Ferelden to get herself ahead.

Ultimately like I said all three leaders were flawed, and even when Anora and Cailan were together they were STILL flawed in the fact that taking out either one would bring down their rule around them. There was no single strong leader possessing all of the skills necessary to be a truly great and exemplar of a King or Queen. At least not in this game, and even Alister still falls short. Although that's the angle they were going for though. No one is perfect and all that. It would be neat to see a character that does have all the good qualities of a King though.


Isn't that kind of the point? It's unrealistic to expect there to be some leader that has all these great qualities. Look throughout our own history and you'll see that everyone has their flaws. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alp_Arslan was proud, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napolean was too ambitious, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill could hardly lead in peace time, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis was completely and utterly ruthless. In fact, Alistair exhibits the best, most genuine trait a leader can have: he doesn't want to be a leader.
User avatar
ILy- Forver
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:18 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 5:30 am

Right, because executing Alister for no good reason as soon as your made ruler is an oh so fair and smart thing to do. :rolleyes:

Then her complete lack of ability to lead on the battlefield is even worse! No one can scheme perfectly forever, she is eventually going to mess up and be unable to stop what threats might appear. Not to mention she betrays people for a dime practically. I wouldn't be surprised that through all of her sneaky double dealings and political know how get her a ton of enemies to conspire against her. She has no one to balance out her sneaky tendencies and put her on an honest path.

Honestly, it's the dishonest ones you can honestly trust to be dishonest. In the short term she would be incredibly effective, but as people learn to deal with her the chances of them all conspiring to take her down grows. Even worse since she treats people like dirt she doesn't have a lot of loyal people willing to save her. Just making it even easier for someone to kill her.

She may seem like the most skillful at ruling, but that is just on a brief glance. She has no... compassion or sense of civic duty. It's all about her, and her ability to be politically savvy. She doesn't seem the type to give a crap about people, and she is surprised Alister let her live when she wouldn't. Like I said, ultimately flawed. We have nothing but evidence to show she is a ruthless ice queen [censored] who would probably sell out some of Ferelden to get herself ahead.

Ultimately like I said all three leaders were flawed, and even when Anora and Cailan were together they were STILL flawed in the fact that taking out either one would bring down their rule around them. There was no single strong leader possessing all of the skills necessary to be a truly great and exemplar of a King or Queen. At least not in this game, and even Alister still falls short. Although that's the angle they were going for though. No one is perfect and all that. It would be neat to see a character that does have all the good qualities of a King though.


I won't get that much into it, since they aren't developed enough to be anolyzed so much. Also, they aren't real. But I am one who sits in a gray area throughout most of my life. :shrug:
User avatar
James Rhead
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:32 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 5:11 am

Isn't that kind of the point? It's unrealistic to expect there to be some leader that has all these great qualities. Look throughout our own history and you'll see that everyone has their flaws. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alp_Arslan was proud, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napolean was too ambitious, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill could hardly lead in peace time, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis was completely and utterly ruthless. In fact, Alistair exhibits the best, most genuine trait a leader can have: he doesn't want to be a leader.

Oh I know it is a horrible thing to expect a perfect leader. No, but those three particular qualities out of dozens are the most important. There have been plenty of leaders with those three particular qualities, but other flaws that are not quite so bad. I will agree Alister is probably the best choice because he doesn't want to rule.

Edit
Compassion, Justice, and Intelligence.
User avatar
casey macmillan
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:37 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 4:33 am

I have a tech support question. I bought and downloaded "Return to Ostagar" today, but I'm getting a prompt that says my game isn't up to date and so I can't run RTO. I bought Dragon Age as a DVD-ROM in November, so it's not what I'd consider old. What are my options for updating the game enough so that I can play RTO? (I downloaded the first patch for the game tonight, but that doesn't seem related.)
User avatar
Princess Johnson
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:44 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 3:34 am

I have a tech support question. I bought and downloaded "Return to Ostagar" today, but I'm getting a prompt that says my game isn't up to date and so I can't run RTO. I bought Dragon Age as a DVD-ROM in November, so it's not what I'd consider old. What are my options for updating the game enough so that I can play RTO? (I downloaded the first patch for the game tonight, but that doesn't seem related.)


http://social.bioware.com/page/da-patches
User avatar
Soku Nyorah
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 9:06 am

I thought Anora would be the worst ruler out of all of them. Mainly because she wanted the power, and thus is the one most likely to abuse that power. Not to mention she is ruthless and wouldn't know what mercy was if someone wrote a book on it, and then slapped her in the face with it. Sure she would see herself and Ferelden prosper, at the cost of Ferelden. :rolleyes:


She's already got a solid track record of being a competent ruler. It's stated numerous times that she's the real ruler and Cailan was just prancing about like a child playing soldier for the entirety of his five year "reign."
User avatar
MARLON JOHNSON
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 7:12 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 4:32 am

She's already got a solid track record of being a competent ruler. It's stated numerous times that she's the real ruler and Cailan was just prancing about like a child playing soldier for the entirety of his five year "reign."

A competent ruler with Cailan making nice with the people of Ferelden. Most people in the game said they liked Cailan, but were more hesitant to say Anora was "loved" by the people. Implying she might not have had such a good reign if Cailan were not there to make nice with the people. So she can run a country effectively. Sometimes that's not enough. The people need to see and like you, and she was decidedly less than stellar in that department.
User avatar
Bryanna Vacchiano
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 8:31 am

A competent ruler with Cailan making nice with the people of Ferelden. Most people in the game said they liked Cailan, but were more hesitant to say Anora was "loved" by the people. Implying she might not have had such a good reign if Cailan were not there to make nice with the people. So she can run a country effectively. Sometimes that's not enough. The people need to see and like you, and she was decidedly less than stellar in that department.


Cailan was hardly roaming about the countryside righting wrongs and saving innocents, he didn't have a clue about heinous things that were going on right under his nose in the alleys of Denerim and the Alienage, there's no implication anywhere in the game that he was some kind of well-travelled diplomat or whatever it is you're implying. He was "loved" because of his father's reputation and because he was part of Ferelden's founding royal bloodline, not because of his own actions.
User avatar
Charles Mckinna
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 4:00 am

Cailan was hardly roaming about the countryside righting wrongs and saving innocents, he didn't have a clue about heinous things that were going on right under his nose in the alleys of Denerim and the Alienage, there's no implication anywhere in the game that he was some kind of well-travelled diplomat or whatever it is you're implying. He was "loved" because of his father's reputation and because he was part of Ferelden's founding royal bloodline, not because of his own actions.


This. His naivete and ignorance are the most clear and driven points.
User avatar
Rhi Edwards
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:42 am

Post » Fri May 27, 2011 10:27 am

Cailan was hardly roaming about the countryside righting wrongs and saving innocents, he didn't have a clue about heinous things that were going on right under his nose in the alleys of Denerim and the Alienage, there's no implication anywhere in the game that he was some kind of well-travelled diplomat or whatever it is you're implying. He was "loved" because of his father's reputation and because he was part of Ferelden's founding royal bloodline, not because of his own actions.

Thanks for adding to my argument Cailan also svcks. Also I should clarify. By "making nice" I am referring to the fact people thought of him as a hero. That and he was generally well liked. I don't think I ever stated that he ever had a [censored] clue what was going on.
User avatar
Monika
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:50 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games