The only problem with that reason is that he is a remnant of that society who wants to dispense completely with the root cause of the nuclear apocalypse: The Politicians.
Not really. As it is made quite clear that the Enclave, a secret society who had people in the places of highest power (thus not being those people themselves), certainly did not improve the conditions for the nuclear apocalypse.
Basically if anyone but house wins now then the FO alternate universe is up a creek with no paddles, a niagara falls drop ahead, and a monkey sitting on your back, banging two plasma mines together.
You put a lot of faith in House, like he is some sort of benevolent messiah. Where does he promise to make all men equal and remove all prejudice? He would probably start the same [censored] if it favored an outcome he desired. He'd throw a bomb on something if it stood in his way.
The rule of House witll be a technocracy or a meritocracy. Cold, perhaps, but effective and rule by reason, logic and aptitude. And it will last. the NCRs political line will shift with each president like leaves blowing in the wind. The legions is just set in archaic dogma. BoS cannot evolve and will die out as the bloodlines slowly decay.
It will last until the next thing comes along, because war, war never changes.
By making everyone their slaves and by doing away with all technology and medical advances?
People make the Legion out like some sort of Luddites. They don't do drugs, but they allow medical technology (people seem to forget that even stimpacks are supposed to be pretty heavy drugs). Their training in melee weapons is partially because of their tribal backgrounds, lack of gun productions (no gun runners for them) and as a fall back (guns break down, but a melee weapon can only break).
They try to buy energy weapons from the Silver Rush/van Graffs.
Well in the end when he takes control of freeside from the Kings, we can only assume that he was now able to actually keep order in that area and clean in up. In fact he would probably develop the areas economy and make that entire area just like the strip (safe and wealthy).
Cleaning it up by throwing out or killing the unwanted people and throwing up a new checkpoint at the entrances so poor people can't get in.
-Who do you think wil benefit in NCR from Vegas getting annexed? The locals of Vegas or NCR business/corporate fatcats, (just as bad as house or worse), politicians and brahmin barons?
The endings suggest both.
Sooner or later House would have to include westside and freeside. He cant expand upward or downward, and a succesfull and prospering strip will need to expand. That means jobs for bartenders, bellhops, accountants, cleaners, plumbers, dealers, construction and maintainence teams. The wealth of vegas would trickle down, creating a middle class and as Vegas grew so would the middle class. Eventually House would need people to reconstruct schools, factories, sanitation which in turn would demand engineers, teachers, demo-experts ect ect ect. And then we havent even begun to consider the spin-off business from people travelling to and from vegas, or the potential to use prewar RobCo blueprints to construct items for export to other areas of the US.
Under House the city of New Vegas could very well become the first city in the post-apocalyptic US to reach pre war living standarts and a pre-war technological level.
Sure people would still live in squaler in the suburbs. But that would be because the people would flock to vegas in hope of jobs, and decent living conditions.Vegas quite simply would not be able to absorb the amount of citizens it got.
There are already cities with pre war living standards and technology. I think Vault City is the first and Shady Sands is probably the second. Certainly the NCR would have several of those by now.
You are painting a rosy picture, forgetting that most likely he will chase out all those that don't fit his plan and kill those that won't budge.
Robot workers are cheaper and more effective, so he'd probably would not need a lot of human workers.
House doesn't seem to value aid to the lesser, allowing at best others to do so. Any school he would built would probably bring all cost at the attendants. People are probably better of going to the Followers for education, especially those less well of.
He'd make an economically strong Vegas, with those that can't afford it thrown out.
It's seems people here can easily see the faults in the others plans, their follies and what not, but House's are treated as some sort of Utopian-everything-will-be-all-right.
Most endings have House ignoring things that aren't Vegas, except Goodsprings and Primm (if you allowed the NCR to take control) and both aren't all that great (you are better of when House ignores you). Two out of three Freeside/King endings have him purging all opposition. An independent Vegas whether controlled by the Courier/Yes-Man or House is seen as a less safe place than before according to the followers ending (Guess those NCR boys were good for something).
All in all, I don't think House's future has a lot of room for those that aren't well of. Which is why I really don't have much of a qualm with offing him.
His cold, calculated pragmatism and arrogance seem to amplify my feelings that he isn't in it for the people but for his own vision. He wants to see this and that happen, he wants progress not for the people's sake but for his own glory and his vision. It's this vision in which the only place for some humanity is to placate the masses so as not to interfere, that makes me uneasy about him. He is quite the despot; Everything is fine unless you are (remotely) in the way of him and his plan.
Like all endings there are those that flourish under his rule, those that are worse of and those that die because of it.