Secondly, who are you to try and disagree with established lore? I normally don't make a habit of arguing with twelve year olds, but tonight I will make an exception. Underworld has nothing to do with Skyrim. Different franchise, different universe. Also, Underworld had a werewolf leader. His name was William. And the Lycans had their leader, his name was Lucien. Got it? Good. And the Circle is a pack of werewolves, as Aela welcomes you to the pack. There is no need for a "leader" because the companions don't really have leaders since the days of Ysgramor, but I guess you don't pay attention to lore since you rather hack N slash your way through quests, right?
Thirdly, don't like the mechanics? Don't. Play. As. A. Werewolf. Simple. And I can give you countless folklore that states many times where people consider Lycanthropy is a curse. Since you watched Underworld, let me tell you that Michael did not lile being a werewolf at first. The wolfman, Lawrence Talbot hated being the wolf. Now in the game: Kodlak, Vilkas, Farkas, SInding. They all dislike being werewolves. Some like it, some don't. And you said way too many cons for werewolves? What cons? You can't get a good night sleep? How in the hell is that a con compared to most? Being a werewolf isn't suppose to be a little kiddie power-up where you hulk out and go on a rampage. Lycanthropy has to have balances: pros and cons. Daggerfall had pros in human and wolf form, as well as cons. Bloodmoon had pros and cons too. Skyrim has an unbalanced version. And it is a perversion of lore. TRUE lore. We all know and love. But I doubt you read anything I wrote. In any case, I'll post it anyways.
/rant.
