Ulfric Stormcloak, murderer?

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:15 pm

I still don't think it's murder. Torygg accepted the challenge. Although I do not think Ulfric should have challenged him. According to...someone in the blue palace, if Ulfric had asked Torygg to declare independence he probably would have. But Ulfric wouldn't do that because then he wouldnt have the power. Typing this out, I just became a supporter of the Empire.
User avatar
Lady Shocka
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:59 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:48 am

Valid points, but there is something I find strange on this issue: Almost all Imperial supporters claim Ulfric simply went in and murdered Torygg, not to mention Elisif will lie directly to you. Of the people affiliated with the Empire there is only Sybile Stentor who awknowledge the duel IIRC. It seems Ulfric is painted as an assassin by the Imperial supporters, so how many would think he was in the right when killing the High King even if they do not support him politically?

It probably comes down to the exact same reason Ulfric can do no wrong in the eyes of his supporters.

That's what it comes down to. Weither people want Skyrim to just become the northern part of Cyrodil, or if they want it to stay Skyrim. And as for me personaly, I want the Nordic people stay barbarians, loyal rough and tumble fighters rather than just become stronger Imperials. The different cultures is what I love about TES, and I can't understand why people would want to lose one.

And don't deny that's not what is happening. The loss of Talos is huge, but it's much much more than that. In Bruma you could see the Imperials activly trying to convert the "heathen" Nords to the proper religion. As trade and all the other good things flowed from Skyrim being a part of the Empire, it slowly started to lose itself. Traditions were changing, being forced to change. And while it may in the end be for the better, I'd rather we not lose a culture all together in TES.

That's the thing, though. They haven't been barbarians for a very long time. That's why it's the return to the "bad old days." It's a return to a time when any Jarl with an inkling of ambition can just walk in and kill another Jarl. That kind of a tradition would have a very destabilizing influence on a society. You talk about loyalty, but the tradition is from a time when Jarls killed each other and openly warred with each other for dominance. Many people would call that a step backwards.
User avatar
Alkira rose Nankivell
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:56 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:18 pm

Ulfric is a murderer whether or not tradition or law supports his actions. Torygg supported Ulfric and he would have probably gone along with his rebellion if he had asked. However, Ulfric did not just want to be a general leading the rebellion. He wanted the crown for himself. You can say that Torygg didn't have to accept his challenge, but if he hadn't, the moot would have probably reconvened and ousted Torygg and places Ulfric on the throne anyway. Ulfric covets the throne above anything else. His actions were unnecessary and immoral.
One person suggests this- Sybille Stentor- and even she admits that Torygg never said anything about it to Ulfric or anyone else. Meanwhile the vendor at Bits and Pieces says that all Torygg did was give speeches about the empire. If he was willing to secede, he did a good job of hiding it.

That's the thing, though. They haven't been barbarians for a very long time. That's why it's the return to the "bad old days." It's a return to a time when any Jarl with an inkling of ambition can just walk in and kill another Jarl. That kind of a tradition would have a very destabilizing influence on a society. You talk about loyalty, but the tradition is from a time when Jarls killed each other and openly warred with each other for dominance. Many people would call that a step backwards.
The thing is that imperial interference has so corrupted Skyrim's civil institutions that people have lost faith in them. When that happens, the only thing that can settle it is the sword. That's as true in the real world as in Skyrim.
User avatar
James Rhead
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:32 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:09 pm

Not sure if you realize this but the Dominion is actively trying to destroy all Men on Tamriel. So you can keep talking about tradition and culture, but it means little when the Dominion comes steamrolling through a fractured and helpless Empire and destroys all Men.

The Empire is streched so thin it can't even take out a local revolution. What hope would it have against the Thalmor? High Rock seems to be holding its own, if my data is up to date. Skyrim could do the same.

That's the thing, though. They haven't been barbarians for a very long time. That's why it's the return to the "bad old days." It's a return to a time when any Jarl with an inkling of ambition can just walk in and kill another Jarl. That kind of a tradition would have a very destabilizing influence on a society. You talk about loyalty, but the tradition is from a time when Jarls killed each other and openly warred with each other for dominance. Many people would call that a step backwards.

I'm not talking in game here, I'm talking outside of it, as ME. I don't want to see TES lose a culture. The Nords are being washed away and their being reformed into a slightly taller version of the Imperials. We're talking about our TES game loseing a RACE here. That should be sending up alarms in so many heads it isn't funny.
User avatar
RAww DInsaww
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:47 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:13 am

It was not a murder under any circumstances. Ulfric challenged Torygg, the boy had a deathwish (which was ultimately fulfilled) if he was considering accepting it. Torygg was young, inexperienced, and an Empire man through-and-through, he deserved to die. The fact that he was slain like a child proves just how unfit to rule he was. Ulfric didn't use the Thu'um to increase his chances of killing Torygg, he did it to further assert his claim.
User avatar
Stryke Force
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 6:20 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:05 pm

Empire propaganda calls it murder so that they can brand Ulfric a criminal. If not, he would've become the High King and Skyrim would secede, weakening the Empire.
User avatar
Daniel Lozano
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:42 am

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:40 am

I still don't think it's murder. Torygg accepted the challenge. Although I do not think Ulfric should have challenged him. According to...someone in the blue palace, if Ulfric had asked Torygg to declare independence he probably would have. But Ulfric wouldn't do that because then he wouldnt have the power. Typing this out, I just became a supporter of the Empire.
See above. Sybille Stentor says that, but no one else corroborates and there's game evidence of the opposite. Ulfric spoke out publically at a moot. If Torygg was inclined to support him, then that was the place to do it, rather than let Ulfric bear the responsibility of risking his neck (again, as he did in Markarth) for Skyrim's independence. The buck stops with the king. His waffling (if indeed he did waffle at all) and then his stubbornness at accepting the duel rather than stepping down meant that civil war was inevitable.

Personally I find his statement in Sovngarde that his only regret was leaving Elisif behind kind of pathetic. No thought about what was going to happen to his people?
User avatar
Soph
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:24 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:45 pm

'In Skyrim, we follow the traditions of our Fathers' Fathers, you'd do well to remember that' -Falk Firebeard, steward to Jarl Elisif the Fair.
User avatar
Gen Daley
 
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 3:36 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:05 pm

Murder is an illegal killing resulting from an unjustifiable excuse. A justifiable excuse for killing another human being in our society is war, self-defense, etc.. (It's called homicide when it's not murder, by the way.) The idea of killing someone in fair battle in their nordic society was justifiable. The thing is, the empire doesn't care about their tradition. If you kill someone, even if the opponent accepts, it is illegal.
User avatar
April D. F
 
Posts: 3346
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:41 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:10 pm

So now you reach the time of the game. Ulfric kills Torygg. The tradition he uses it technically still on the books, but has not been used in so long that many do not view it favorably. However, since it is still on the books, Ulfric's supporters can go "It's tradition! It's legal!" Meanwhile, the rest of Skyrim is going, "We're not a bunch of dumb barbarians! We don't do that, anymore! That was murder!"
Torygg and his court validated the custom when he accepted the challenge and they let it happen.
User avatar
Julia Schwalbe
 
Posts: 3557
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:02 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:31 pm

Murder is an illegal killing resulting from an unjustifiable excuse. A justifiable excuse for killing another human being in our society is war, self-defense, etc.. (It's called homicide when it's not murder, by the way.) The idea of killing someone in fair battle in their nordic society was justifiable. The thing is, the empire doesn't care about their tradition. If you kill someone, even if the opponent accepts, it is illegal.

Or atleast when it's convinient for the Empire. Do you think they would've called Torygg a murderer if he managed to kill Ulfric in the duel?
User avatar
Mistress trades Melissa
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:28 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:27 pm

As many have stated, it wasn't murder because it wasn't an unlawful killing. By law, lethal duels are allowed, the duel was accepted, with everyone including their mothers knowing well before the duel that Ulfric could use the shout. It only became murder because Ulfric sought to remove Skyrim from the empire and become an independent nation. If it was illegal to kill someone in a duel, then the empire may as well burn the entire country of High Rock.
User avatar
sexy zara
 
Posts: 3268
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:53 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:06 am

With or without the Empire, if the dragonborn was high king no jarl would challenge him - or start [censored] with other jarls - for fear of enraging the Dragonborn.
User avatar
sexy zara
 
Posts: 3268
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:53 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:40 pm

Empire propaganda calls it murder so that they can brand Ulfric a criminal. If not, he would've become the High King and Skyrim would secede, weakening the Empire.
MAN why did I not put this together before?!
User avatar
Motionsharp
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:33 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:21 pm

As many have stated, it wasn't murder because it wasn't an unlawful killing. By law, lethal duels are allowed, the duel was accepted, with everyone including their mothers knowing well before the duel that Ulfric could use the shout. It only became murder because Ulfric sought to remove Skyrim from the empire and become an independent nation. If it was illegal to kill someone in a duel, then the empire may as well burn the entire country of High Rock.

I think it would be best for all of Nirn if the Empire wiped out the Bretons of High Rock. The Empire would have more than my support then, and I think the world would be a better place.....
User avatar
ShOrty
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:15 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:13 pm

I think it would be best for all of Nirn if the Empire wiped out the Bretons of High Rock. The Empire would have more than my support then, and I think the world would be a better place.....
Upon the last inch of High Rock torched, everyone suddenly obtained CHIM, even the Thalmor, for it was High Rock and its citizens which become the underlying problem of everything in Tamriel.
User avatar
Greg Cavaliere
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:04 pm



Or atleast when it's convinient for the Empire. Do you think they would've called Torygg a murderer if he managed to kill Ulfric in the duel?
We'll never know... You can't assume they wouldn't punish Torygg. Give me proof that reconciles your accusation with fact. Besides, I'm sure they would have called it self defense.
User avatar
Ross Thomas
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:06 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:51 pm

We'll never know... You can't assume they wouldn't punish Torygg. Give me proof that reconciles your accusation with fact. Besides, I'm sure they would call it self defense.
Jarl Igmund kept his seat even though he admits violating the WGC and throwing Ulfric under the bus for it. The empire even writes the propaganda for it.
User avatar
Daniel Lozano
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:42 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:22 pm

That's what it comes down to. Weither people want Skyrim to just become the northern part of Cyrodil, or if they want it to stay Skyrim. And as for me personaly, I want the Nordic people stay barbarians, loyal rough and tumble fighters rather than just become stronger Imperials. The different cultures is what I love about TES, and I can't understand why people would want to lose one.

And don't deny that's not what is happening. The loss of Talos is huge, but it's much much more than that. In Bruma you could see the Imperials activly trying to convert the "heathen" Nords to the proper religion. As trade and all the other good things flowed from Skyrim being a part of the Empire, it slowly started to lose itself. Traditions were changing, being forced to change. And while it may in the end be for the better, I'd rather we not lose a culture all together in TES.

Um bro, you do know that skyrim would've stayed its own province right? It wouldn't have been tuned into "northern cyrodiil" as you claim if it remained with the empire.

Also everyone you're making Torygg appear like he was only like 15...He is clearly above his mid 20s, he is by no definition a kid or baby.

Empire propaganda calls it murder so that they can brand Ulfric a criminal. If not, he would've become the High King and Skyrim would secede, weakening the Empire.

Stormcloak propaganda calls the empire a puppet of the Thalmor and makes several claims to the Empire as being oppressive and corrupt despite him having to FORCE the Jarls to make him High King whereas the Empire didn't force the Jarls to make anyone High king even if you beat the CW for the Imperials, they still never force anyone to choose while Ulfric's persuasive "charm" is him reminding the Jarls whose armies populate their cities. Also thats not even true, a lot of Jarls would oppose his rule because Ulfric is not fit to rule skyrim, only 2 of the Jarls actually follow him, the jarl of winterhold doesn't care.

I think it would be best for all of Nirn if the Empire wiped out the Bretons of High Rock. The Empire would have more than my support then, and I think the world would be a better place.....

You know...a real Orc would just want to live in peace and return to Orsinium, not to further the violence and prove that war and bloodshed is the only thing they know. If the orcs demanded a mass genocide on Bretons it would not only weaken the empire but prove that both sides can't get over differences and it would only demonize the orcs even further.
User avatar
how solid
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:27 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:09 pm

We'll never know... You can't assume they wouldn't punish Torygg. Give me proof that reconciles your accusation with fact.

Torygg was an Empire man, if he knew that duels weren't allowed (which is a very wierd thing to come from the Empire), then he wouldn't have accepted the challenge. Yes a moot is called, bu the Empire could make sure he stayed in power, either by overriding the authority of the moot or by bribing the Jarls like they did with the WGC. And if he knew the Empire wouldn't condone his actions, then he was an idiot for accepting in the first place and deserved to die more than he already did.
User avatar
Skivs
 
Posts: 3550
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:06 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:45 pm

We'll never know... You can't assume they wouldn't punish Torygg. Give me proof that reconciles your accusation with fact. Besides, I'm sure they would call it self defense.
I believe they would not. It was no secret that Ulfric was against the Empire before the war started and I think the Empire would just think "Hey, the HIgh King took care of a potential threat to the Empire. Let us give him aa pat of the back."
User avatar
[ becca ]
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:59 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:31 pm

Stormcloak propaganda calls the empire a puppet of the Thalmor and makes several claims to the Empire as being oppressive and corrupt despite him having to FORCE the Jarls to make him High King whereas the Empire didn't force the Jarls to make anyone High king even if you beat the CW for the Imperials, they still never force anyone to choose while Ulfric's persuasive "charm" is him reminding the Jarls whose armies populate their cities.

Hey, I wonder what the Imperial-supporters prefer more, the Empire, or their gold?
User avatar
W E I R D
 
Posts: 3496
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:08 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:56 pm

Upon the last inch of High Rock torched, everyone suddenly obtained CHIM, even the Thalmor, for it was High Rock and its citizens which become the underlying problem of everything in Tamriel.

They're the cause of most of the Orsimer's problems.... -_-
The fact that they can nearly commit genocide, but the Empire lets them walk free makes no sense.
When Ulfric kills a king, and a war is started......Just shows how the Empire thinks. The Orsimer will not leave them, for where do they have to go?
The Nords of Skyrim on the other hand, they could survive and thrive without the Empire. =/
User avatar
Horse gal smithe
 
Posts: 3302
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:23 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:46 pm

You know...a real Orc would just want to live in peace and return to Orsinium, not to further the violence and prove that war and bloodshed is the only thing they know. If the orcs demanded a mass genocide on Bretons it would not only weaken the empire but prove that both sides can't get over differences and it would only demonize the orcs even further.

Return to Orsinium for what, fifty years? Then have it destroyed by the Bretons yet again while the Empire turns a blind eye. No thank you, there cannot be peace for the Orsimer until the Bretons are gone, their actions have proved it time and time again. I want peace, I want the Orcs to return to Orsinium, but I know it will just be for a time while the Bretons still walk.
User avatar
Sheeva
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:21 pm

Um bro, you do know that skyrim would've stayed its own province right? It wouldn't have been tuned into "northern cyrodiil" as you claim if it remained with the empire.

You think that if the Empire wins this Civil war Skyrim's going to get out of this with just a slap on the wrist? If the Empire wins, that will show all of Skyrim that the traditions of old hold no weight anymore. The Empire and it's laws will become the laws of Skyrim officially. It will, for all intensive perposes, be northern cyrodil. It will still be Skyrim on paper, but not in practice.
User avatar
Joanne
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:25 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim