Ulfric Stormcloak, murderer?

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:36 pm

Torygg was an Empire man, if he knew that duels weren't allowed (which is a very wierd thing to come from the Empire), then he wouldn't have accepted the challenge. Yes a moot is called, bu the Empire could make sure he stayed in power, either by overriding the authority of the moot or by bribing the Jarls like they did with the WGC. And if he knew the Empire wouldn't condone his actions, then he was an idiot for accepting in the first place and deserved to die more than he already did.

The Empire isn't actually allowed to interfere with local politics of a country unless it means the province is trying to secede, they have no real say in the Moot its like how they couldn't do anything in the grand council of Morrowind.

Hey, I wonder what the Imperial-supporters prefer more, the Empire, or their gold?

The Empire, anyone thats not stupid enough to believe half of the lies that come out of Ulfric's mouth would know that, plus its better then having your head chopped off and being made into an example for disagreeing with Ulfric's claim to the throne.


You think that if the Empire wins this Civil war Skyrim's going to get out of this with just a slap on the wrist? If the Empire wins, that will show all of Skyrim that the traditions of old hold no weight anymore. The Empire and it's laws will become the laws of Skyrim officially. It will, for all intensive perposes, be northern cyrodil. It will still be Skyrim on paper, but not in practice.

No it will pretty much still be skyrim and have the same customs, it just wouldn't be ruled like by an idiot, loud mouth tyrant

Return to Orsinium for what, fifty years? Then have it destroyed by the Bretons yet again while the Empire turns a blind eye. No thank you, there cannot be peace for the Orsimer until the Bretons are gone, their actions have proved it time and time again. I want peace, I want the Orcs to return to Orsinium, but I know it will just be for a time while the Bretons still walk.

You do know that a large amount of Orcs were saved by the legions and given new home, right? The empire helped the Orcs out and its really not their fault that the state lords attacked but Orsinium wanted to be apart of the High Rock political factions and you know what, this is what happens in high rock, state lords fight each other for land. The Jarls did the same thing for a long time as did the Great houses of Morrowind
User avatar
Emerald Dreams
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:52 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:28 pm

They're the cause of most of the Orsimer's problems.... -_-
The fact that they can nearly commit genocide, but the Empire lets them walk free makes no sense.
When Ulfric kills a king, and a war is started......Just shows how the Empire thinks. The Orsimer will not leave them, for where do they have to go?
The Nords of Skyrim on the other hand, they could survive and thrive without the Empire. =/
Thats a lie, when the bretons try to kill all of the orismers, the empire sacrificed a large amount of soldiers to save fleeing civilians. It was the medes.
User avatar
Gill Mackin
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 9:58 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:20 pm

Jarl Igmund kept his seat even though he admits violating the WGC and throwing Ulfric under the bus for it. The empire even writes the propaganda for it.
Don't get me wrong, I know the Empire has often condoned immoral actions, (such as that). I'm just saying that we don't know what they actually would have done. And no matter what incident you show me that displays any form of parallel to this, we will never know for sure. What you showed me was not proof, but evidence. All we can really do is speculate.
User avatar
Cat Haines
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:27 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:24 pm

Thats a lie, when the bretons try to kill all of the orismers, the empire sacrificed a large amount of soldiers to save fleeing civilians. It was the medes.

Key word being fleeing, not to save Orsinium. Also, when were the Bretons punished for doing so? When that comes forward I will apologize, but until then I will continue to be displeased with the Empire.
User avatar
Scared humanity
 
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:41 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:17 pm


I believe they would not. It was no secret that Ulfric was against the Empire before the war started and I think the Empire would just think "Hey, the HIgh King took care of a potential threat to the Empire. Let us give him aa pat of the back."
That's possible. But maybe, by some small chance, there would be someone to stand against the unjust actions.
User avatar
c.o.s.m.o
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:21 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:07 pm

No it will pretty much still be skyrim and have the same customs, it just wouldn't be ruled like by an idiot, loud mouth tyrant

The entire civil war is about which customs should be followed. Ulfric used the old Nordic customs to legitimize his claim, and the Empire is saying those old ways should stay in the past.
User avatar
roxxii lenaghan
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:53 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:35 pm

Jarl Igmund kept his seat even though he admits violating the WGC and throwing Ulfric under the bus for it. The empire even writes the propaganda for it.

The empire actually hasn't spread any propaganda around, I've read all the in-game books and talk to pretty much all the npcs and no where did they say anything about propaganda while Ulfric on the other hand has made several propaganda moves i.e the Empire is trying to destroy nord way of life, culture, they are nothing but puppets of the Thalmor. All propaganda with no grain of truth that is shown anywhere in game or through canon writings.

The entire civil war is about which customs should be followed. Ulfric used the old Nordic customs to legitimize his claim, and the Empire is saying those old ways should stay in the past.

The war is about Ulfric's unjust claim to the throne, Thalmor lies implanted into Ulfric's head and his thirst for power, things that have actually been shown in-game to be correct.
User avatar
Poetic Vice
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:19 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:18 pm

That's possible. Maybe, by some small chance, there would be someone to stand against the unjust actions.
But that has nothing to do with justice, but with the Empire protecting itself. The book Bear of Markarth and what happened to Ulfric in the Markarth incident is also the Empire protecting itself. Is the Empire the wrong choice in the CW? Probably not more than the Stormcloaks are, but I have no doubts they would be willing to let serious illegal actions which favors the Empire go unpunished. However, the duel was legal and the Empire only persicute Ulfric because he is trying to secceed.
User avatar
Ana Torrecilla Cabeza
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:15 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:00 pm

The Empire isn't actually allowed to interfere with local politics of a country unless it means the province is trying to secede, they have no real say in the Moot its like how they couldn't do anything in the grand council of Morrowind.

But the Empire was interefering in Morrowind. They had a vested interest in fulfilling the prophecy of the Nerevarine since they knew it would end the dominion of the Tribunal, who were capable of putting up serious opposition to the Empire.

The Empire, anyone thats not stupid enough to believe half of the lies that come out of Ulfric's mouth would know that, plus its better then having your head chopped off and being made into an example for disagreeing with Ulfric's claim to the throne.

Uh, the Empire were the ones chopping off heads. Never actually see Ulfric do that to someone in game, iirc. Besides, Ulfric isn't lying, much. He's much better written that. Just like Tullius. They are both right, and both wrong.

Ulfric's greatest sin is timing, trying to get Skyrim to leave the Empire at a time when they could least afford it, having already lost Hammerfell, Argonia, the Summerset Isles, Valenwood, Elsweyr, and Morrowind (effectively, anyway). Without Skyrim, its just them and High Rock, and how long do you think they could hold that on their own? An Ulfric victory more or less signals the death of the Empire. A new alliance would probably rise from the ashes to fight the Thalmor, but the Cyrodiils wouldn't be running the show, and out of everything going on here, that is what they find unacceptable.
User avatar
Cat
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:10 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:38 am

But the Empire was interefering in Morrowind. They had a vested interest in fulfilling the prophecy of the Nerevarine since they knew it would end the dominion of the Tribunal, who were capable of putting up serious opposition to the Empire.



Uh, the Empire were the ones chopping off heads. Never actually see Ulfric do that to someone in game, iirc. Besides, Ulfric isn't lying, much. He's much better written that. Just like Tullius. They are both right, and both wrong.

Ulfric's greatest sin is timing, trying to get Skyrim to leave the Empire at a time when they could least afford it, having already lost Hammerfell, Argonia, the Summerset Isles, Valenwood, Elsweyr, and Morrowind (effectively, anyway). Without Skyrim, its just them and High Rock, and how long do you think they could hold that on their own? An Ulfric victory more or less signals the death of the Empire. A new alliance would probably rise from the ashes to fight the Thalmor, but the Cyrodiils wouldn't be running the show, and out of everything going on here, that is what they find unacceptable.

They never actually interfered with house politics, what the Nerevarine did for the houses was on his own and doesn't reflect the Empire, not to mention you can go the whole game without upsetting the balance of the great houses.

And no I honestly doubt that Ulfric will hold the throne for long before a decent amount of people revolt against his oppression, he does show signs of being oppressive and forceful towards the Jarls and I believe he isn't even fit to be a Jarl let along a high king, he has not proven himself as a leader nor has he actually managed to get a ton of support from a majority of the nords outside of Stormcloak territory, hell not even a decent amount of nords outside of the stormcloak ranks in stormcloak territory believe in his cause.

I'm all for an independent Skyrim, but Ulfric is not the man to lead such a kingdom, skyrim deserves a better leader and not another tyrant they've had enough of those in the passed.

As for the empire being the one to do all these "mass executions" you stormcloak fans often bring up, that was the only mass execution that was shown in game and there are no texts stating there where more, they were killing innocents they were killing traitors and a thief, the dragonborn just got in the way at the wrong time and was mistaken for a stormcloak supporter. As for how I know Ulfric would do executions once he is a king is because thats what tyrants do, they get rid of the "undesirables" that would challenge their rule.
User avatar
LittleMiss
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:22 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:53 pm

Ulfric cheated. Plain and simple.

I know Nords have their pathetic sense of self worth and tradition, but I rather doubt tradition has it that the strongest Nord is the one who strikes down an unarmed man. Had Ulfric had even the slightest sense of decency, he would have fought Torygg in the traditional duel. Both sides have the same weapons, neither man has an advantage of position or surprise. Only then can a duel be considered fair and the winner declared to be the better warrior.

Ulfric didn't even have the decency to fight his ground when ambushed, preferring death to the headsman's axe to death in battle. I think that says more about him than any words.
User avatar
Brandon Bernardi
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:06 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:55 am

Ulfric cheated. Plain and simple.

I know Nords have their pathetic sense of self worth and tradition, but I rather doubt tradition has it that the strongest Nord is the one who strikes down an unarmed man. Had Ulfric had even the slightest sense of decency, he would have fought Torygg in the traditional duel. Both sides have the same weapons, neither man has an advantage of position or surprise. Only then can a duel be considered fair and the winner declared to be the better warrior.

Ulfric didn't even have the decency to fight his ground when ambushed, preferring death to the headsman's axe to death in battle. I think that says more about him than any words.

He has a point, Ulfric fled Solitude before anyone could say anything. It was pretty much he killed Torygg then ran like a girl, a true nord would've stayed even if he was jailed further proving what he did was honorable and he will not say otherwise.
User avatar
Darrell Fawcett
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:12 pm

He has a point, Ulfric fled Solitude before anyone could say anything. It was pretty much he killed Torygg then ran like a girl, a true nord would've stayed even if he was jailed further proving what he did was honorable and he will not say otherwise.
I never thought of this, this point also proves that Torggy is more of a nord then Ulfric, as he knew he was going die but refused to back down. Ulfric IS NOT a true nord.
User avatar
Jessie Butterfield
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:59 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:16 pm


But that has nothing to do with justice, but with the Empire protecting itself. The book Bear of Markarth and what happened to Ulfric in the Markarth incident is also the Empire protecting itself. Is the Empire the wrong choice in the CW? Probably not more than the Stormcloaks are, but I have no doubts they would be willing to let serious illegal actions which favors the Empire go unpunished. However, the duel was legal and the Empire only persicute Ulfric because he is trying to secceed.
You're misunderstanding me. Letting homicide go with no justifiable excuse is unjust and immoral, plain and simple.
User avatar
Abi Emily
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:59 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:19 pm

Using every tool you have to win a fight is not cheating. By that logic, using a tank against a soldier is "cheating". Using something to gain the upper hand is not cheating.

If Ulfric had lost despite using a shout, no one would accuse him of cheating, so why is it cheating when the outcome is reversed?
That's the thing though, you're comparing a fantasy world set in medieval times to a modern day war. For them, using something like the Thu'um would have been "cheating" because only a very select few have the ability, had Ulfric actually fought Torygg then and only then would it have been considered a fair fight.

I personally don't care either way, I'd kill someone like Ulfric any day of the week, but that's just me. :P
User avatar
Elena Alina
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:24 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:59 pm

I think it was intended to be fair but ulfric kinda cheated with the voice, ripping him apart limb by limb....
i agree with him!
User avatar
Marquis T
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:13 pm

Don't care if he murdered him or not, I just know he is a whiney baby who can't handle different opinions and the word "no" like a child.
User avatar
Shannon Lockwood
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:35 pm

He has a point, Ulfric fled Solitude before anyone could say anything. It was pretty much he killed Torygg then ran like a girl, a true nord would've stayed even if he was jailed further proving what he did was honorable and he will not say otherwise.
Giving yourself up to imperial milk drinkers so they can carry out their sham justice is not being a Nord, it's being an idiot.
User avatar
Samantha Pattison
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:19 am

Giving yourself up to imperial milk drinkers so they can carry out their sham justice is not being a Nord, it's being an idiot.

Its standing up for what you believe in, a true nord warrior with honor would stand with pride over his victory and claim himself the better man but thats not what Ulfric did he ran like, something an "imperial milk drinker" would do and if he won doesn't that mean his claim to the Throne is legit now? So why run instead of staying your ground and further proving that you belong on the throne.
User avatar
Alexis Estrada
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:22 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:52 pm

They never actually interfered with house politics, what the Nerevarine did for the houses was on his own and doesn't reflect the Empire, not to mention you can go the whole game without upsetting the balance of the great houses.

House politics were just a sideshow compared to the Tribunal. The Houses on their own were no threat to the Empire, too divided. But all Vivec needed to do was snap his fingers and it was war time. Morrowind only became part of the Empire by the Tribunal's sufferance, and they leveraged big concessions from the Empire in the process, which was the reason the Empire couldn't overtly interfere with House politics. Although you can imagine all kinds of soft influence going on with the Hlaalu......

And no I honestly doubt that Ulfric will hold the throne for long before a decent amount of people revolt against his oppression, he does show signs of being oppressive and forceful towards the Jarls and I believe he isn't even fit to be a Jarl let along a high king, he has not proven himself as a leader nor has he actually managed to get a ton of support from a majority of the nords outside of Stormcloak territory, hell not even a decent amount of nords outside of the stormcloak ranks in stormcloak territory believe in his cause.

Actually, Ulfric has proven himself to be a leader. Why else do you think so many follow him and name themselves Stormcloaks after him? And they follow him, not his cause. He's a cult of personality. He has a great deal of personal strength and righteous indignation, and people respond to that. He fought for the Empire in the Great War and suffered at the hands of the Thalmor, what terrors they inflicted on him I cannot imagine, only to see the Empire sue for peace with the Thalmor, using his god as a bargaining chip. He fought for the Empire at Markarth, shouting the Forsworn off the walls, all on the promise of being free to practice his beliefs, and they arrested him! He's been deeply wronged by the Empire, and draws strength from that. Men like Galmar Stone-Fist are ready to die for him, and his enemies like Rikke and Balgruuf respect him, even if they don't like him or agree with him. I imagine he would be king for quite some time.

He does have his flaws, but then, he wouldn't be interesting if he didn't.
User avatar
Pete Schmitzer
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:20 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:21 am

You're misunderstanding me. Letting homicide go with no justifiable excuse is unjust and immoral, plain and simple.
It is not homicide, not after the law and that is the point. If it were why would the Imperial supporters lie about Ulfric coming in and simply shouting at the High King, not ever mentioning anything about a challenge?
And even if it were the Empire would make an excuse to justify it, because it took care of a problem they had that could(and did) escalate.
User avatar
BlackaneseB
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:21 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:06 pm

House politics were just a sideshow compared to the Tribunal. The Houses on their own were no threat to the Empire, too divided. But all Vivec needed to do was snap his fingers and it was war time. Morrowind only became part of the Empire by the Tribunal's sufferance, and they leveraged big concessions from the Empire in the process, which was the reason the Empire couldn't overtly interfere with House politics. Although you can imagine all kinds of soft influence going on with the Hlaalu......



Actually, Ulfric has proven himself to be a leader. Why else do you think so many follow him and name themselves Stormcloaks after him? And they follow him, not his cause. He's a cult of personality. He has a great deal of personal strength and righteous indignation, and people respond to that. He fought for the Empire in the Great War and suffered at the hands of the Thalmor, what terrors they inflicted on him I cannot imagine, only to see the Empire sue for peace with the Thalmor, using his god as a bargaining chip. He fought for the Empire at Markarth, shouting the Forsworn off the walls, all on the promise of being free to practice his beliefs, and they arrested him! He's been deeply wronged by the Empire, and draws strength from that. Men like Galmar Stone-Fist are ready to die for him, and his enemies like Rikke and Balgruuf respect him, even if they don't like him or agree with him. I imagine he would be king for quite some time.

He does have his flaws, but then, he wouldn't be interesting if he didn't.

An army does not make a leader as for the Houses being a sideshow, thats not actually true the Tribunal can only act as mediators they can't actually force a house to do anything, not even indoril would do everything the Tribunal would do plus you had the houses that didn't care for them like a majority of Hlaalu and all of House Telvanni.

As for the Markarth incident, the Empire didn't promise him anything that was all Igmund and thats the only person you have to blame, Ulfric has not proven himself a true leader, he has not shown any favor for diplomacy instead he threatens Whiterun to join him or face his army, he favors war over words a quality a true leader with honor should never do.
User avatar
sunny lovett
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:59 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:58 pm

Its standing up for what you believe in, a true nord warrior with honor would stand with pride over his victory and claim himself the better man but thats not what Ulfric did he ran like, something an "imperial milk drinker" would do and if he won doesn't that mean his claim to the Throne is legit now? So why run instead of staying your ground and further proving that you belong on the throne.
Yes, it would trigger a moot, except Skyrim's government has been reduced to imperial puppet-dom and the jarls bought off... see again, http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Skyrim:Skyrim%27s_Rule (did you ever read it the first time I posted it in response to your posts?) and Balgruuf admitting they took imperial gold in exchange for shutting up about the WGC. You can't play fair when the other guy has already stacked and marked the deck.
User avatar
Cheryl Rice
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:44 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:15 am

You do know that a large amount of Orcs were saved by the legions and given new home, right? The empire helped the Orcs out and its really not their fault that the state lords attacked but Orsinium wanted to be apart of the High Rock political factions and you know what, this is what happens in high rock, state lords fight each other for land. The Jarls did the same thing for a long time as did the Great houses of Morrowind

Sorry, just caught this now.

People fleeing after their home had been ruined, yes. My point was, in the case of it being between waring lords, the Bretons were allowed to walk free without any punishment.
While Ulfric kills one man and they declare him a criminal and go to war over it. So it goes like I said. The Orcs have to stay with the Empire, for there is no where for us, so they don't have to worry about us too much......just make sure to save a few survivors. Yet the Nords are trying to secede, so they must pull out all stops.

Also, no, Orsinium was applying for provincial status, not trying to be apart of High Rock's political games. Face it, the Orsimer were given the short end of the stick. I'm starting to get over it and with time I'll most likely side with the Empire. However, it is plain wrong to say the Empire cares for the Orsimer as much as the other races.

I thought I'd throw this in to go with my last statement. Read the last line about Tiber Septim in the section about Orsinium.
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Pocket_Guide_to_the_Empire,_1st_Edition/The_Wild_Region
User avatar
Steve Bates
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:51 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:45 pm

Sorry, just caught this now.

People fleeing after their home had been ruined, yes. My point was, in the case of it being between waring lords, the Bretons were allowed to walk free without any punishment.
While Ulfric kills one man and they declare him a criminal and go to war over it. So it goes like I said. The Orcs have to stay with the Empire, for there is no where for us, so they don't have to worry about us too much......just make sure to save a few survivors. Yet the Nords are trying to secede, so they must pull out all stops.

Also, no, Orsinium was applying for provincial status, not trying to be apart of High Rock's political games. Face it, the Orsimer were given the short end of the stick. I'm starting to get over it and with time I'll most likely side with the Empire. However, it is plain wrong to say the Empire cares for the Orsimer as much as the other races.

While they were trying to gain provincial status they also had to deal with the state lords and since Orsinium was in fact by all terms a city state thats meant the leader was considered a state lord by the Bretons, also just going to tell you this I really blame Malacath more since he cursed the leader of Orsinium for forcing his subjects to worship Trinimac instead of Malacath, who he considered to be someone else and still around, Trinimac though being Malacath it is just Malacath's former self and not who he is anymore.

Yes, it would trigger a moot, except Skyrim's government has been reduced to imperial puppet-dom and the jarls bought off... see again, http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Skyrim:Skyrim%27s_Rule (did you ever read it the first time I posted it in response to your posts?) and Balgruuf admitting they took imperial gold in exchange for shutting up about the WGC. You can't play fair when the other guy has already stacked and marked the deck.

Its better to give them gold then end up having the Jarls go and get themselves arrested so the Thalomor can secretly place their own puppets into the skyrim court, and Ulfric by no means should be allowed to pick who is allowed to be a jarl or not either.

Also just pointing this out the passage "But as I prepared to leave Skyrim, I could feel a change in the air, sense the trepidation of some of the good Nord people. Many seemed unhappy with the Empire's continued presence in their land. And the outlawing of the worship of Talos as the Ninth Divine - a stipulation of the White-gold concordat the peace treaty between the Empire and Aldmeri Dominion - has only strengthened that division." can be seen as bias as the author is a redguard from hammerfell, so just pointing this out before someone uses it as an example.
User avatar
maddison
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:22 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim