Imperial or Stormcloaks?

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:11 pm

As i "edited" in my last post, the stormcloaks have one thing blinding them, "Honour", while the Imperials seem not to care for it, meaning the imperials will have no problem using underhand tactics, stormcloaks...not so much. Also playing the dominions "[censored]" is also necisary to buy time for the legion to recover.

Buying time doesnt work when the other side gains more than you do. The WGC makes the empire weaker not stronger.
User avatar
kennedy
 
Posts: 3299
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:53 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:13 am

You've still yet to define these 'underhand tactics,' and cite examples of them within TES history. When Nords talk about Honor, I'm almost certain they mean the honor of battle, not noble tactics. Sure, they have a distrust of magic, that's about the only thing they won't use. And it hasn't stopped them before (long term), the Nords have been very successful in the art of warfare.

Their treatment of Balgruuf is a prime example.
Tullius tells his 2nd to tell Balgruuf what Ulfric is planning, and embellish it if necessary.
Ulfric tells Balgruuf what he is planning directly. Some dont like that he attacked Balgruuf, but the point is he gave him fair warning not lies.
User avatar
Tai Scott
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:58 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:45 pm

Their treatment of Balgruuf is a prime example.
Tullius tells his 2nd to tell Balgruuf what Ulfric is planning, and embellish it if necessary.
Ulfric tells Balgruuf what he is planning directly. Some dont like that he attacked Balgruuf, but the point is he gave him fair warning not lies.
Who cares if he lied? That doesn't change the fact that Ulfric was the one planning on attacking whiterun. What's a little white lie in a sea of distrust?
User avatar
sarah taylor
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:36 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:21 am

And what must be done? The Stormcloaks are more eager to destroy the Dominion than the Empire, that's good enough.
They're never going to. The Stormcloaks want independent Skyrim. Any confrontation with the Thalmor is going to be a desperate defense of the province itself, not the crusade some of them may fantasize about.
User avatar
Paula Ramos
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:01 am

Plus i think that since the empire basically owns almost all land in tamriel they have a right to skyrim.
That's messed up. It's also no longer true. The empire consists of Cyrodiil (parts of which have gone over to the Dominion), High Rock and maybe Skyrim.
User avatar
cheryl wright
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:43 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:17 am

Long Live The Empire.
User avatar
sarah taylor
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:36 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:27 am

Ulfric acknowledges that he has strayed from the Greybeards' teachings. But he still holds an opinion that the Voice should not be used lightly, only with good reason. In this case, it was probably to prove a point. In shouting Torygg, he was most likely reminding the Imperials about Talos. Ulfric would have no problem defeating Torygg in fair-combat, considering that Torygg was a young man and Ulfric was a Legionnare veteran.


Honestly, I do enjoy a good tale of redemption. However, merely saying one repents is but a first step; sincerely following through with it will test a person's true character. The reason I bring this up is because I have seen Ulfric using the thu'um, both when I fight for him and against him. In one of those instances, he was in a one on one skirmish with a Solitude town guard. These actions have undoubtably overshadowed any words Ulfric said with regards to repentance.

As for the challenging the king to high combat in order to get the Empire's attention on the banning of Talos worship, it seems that Ulfric made a horrible miscalculation. I have little doubt that his intention was to at least gain a near unified support from the people of Skyrim, and at best get the Empire to back him for the Moot. Unfortunately, the actual result ended in a fairly even split in the land, leading to a civil war in which has cost the lives of many good men and women. All the while, the Thalmor roam freely, unchecked and unchallenged.
User avatar
Claudia Cook
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:22 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:33 pm

IF IS SEE ONE MORE OF THESE THREADS I WILL KILL YOU ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :swear: :swear: :swear: :swear: :swear: :swear: :swear: :swear:

More on topic, I like the Legion.
User avatar
Scarlet Devil
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:31 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:28 pm


Ulfric has been betrayed by the very empire that he served and views the empire to weak to have the right to rule over skyri and wants to do away with thier inluence to wipe the slate clean so that the people of skyrim can start fresh.....as in go back to the traditions of thier heroic forefathers.


And by 'has been betrayed' you mean, 'is a traitor who betrayed.'

The Empire has betrayed Ulfric's ideals and beliefs. Acting like that is more concrete and important that actual treason against the laws and rightful ruler of your country... derp.
User avatar
Kerri Lee
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:37 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:30 pm

Honestly, I do enjoy a good tale of redemption. However, merely saying one repents is but a first step; sincerely following through with it will test a person's true character. The reason I bring this up is because I have seen Ulfric using the thu'um, both when I fight for him and against him. In one of those instances, he was in a one on one skirmish with a Solitude town guard. These actions have undoubtably overshadowed any words Ulfric said with regards to repentance.

As for the challenging the king to high combat in order to get the Empire's attention on the banning of Talos worship, it seems that Ulfric made a horrible miscalculation. I have little doubt that his intention was to at least gain a near unified support from the people of Skyrim, and at best get the Empire to back him for the Moot. Unfortunately, the actual result ended in a fairly even split in the land, leading to a civil war in which has cost the lives of many good men and women. All the while, the Thalmor roam freely, unchecked and unchallenged.
Honestly, I do enjoy a good tale of redemption. However, merely saying one repents is but a first step; sincerely following through with it will test a person's true character. The reason I bring this up is because I have seen Ulfric using the thu'um, both when I fight for him and against him. In one of those instances, he was in a one on one skirmish with a Solitude town guard. These actions have undoubtably overshadowed any words Ulfric said with regards to repentance.

As for the challenging the king to high combat in order to get the Empire's attention on the banning of Talos worship, it seems that Ulfric made a horrible miscalculation. I have little doubt that his intention was to at least gain a near unified support from the people of Skyrim, and at best get the Empire to back him for the Moot. Unfortunately, the actual result ended in a fairly even split in the land, leading to a civil war in which has cost the lives of many good men and women. All the while, the Thalmor roam freely, unchecked and unchallenged.

I don't think that's right. You're crossing gameplay with story. They game developers programmed Ulfric's AI to use the Thu'um in combat, you can't parallel the two. If you did, than neither the Stormcloaks nor the Leigon would stand a chance against the Dominion because in-game a group of Aldmeri soldiers can easily kill 4 times the number of Stormcloaks/Imperials.

Besides shouting Torygg, the last known time we know Ulfric used the Voice was when retaking Markarth from the Forsworn, and that was 25 years ago. Although, I can understand using the Thu'um during your last stand or as you are about to crush your enemies.
User avatar
Wayne W
 
Posts: 3482
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:29 am

If the developers considered it important that Ulfric refrained from using Thu'um, they could have just left it out of his AI. I think fighting for your life is a good situation to use the Thu'um, and Ulfric left the Greybeards because he lost patience with their inaction.


Edit: Hey look, it's my satan post.
User avatar
DAVId MArtInez
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:16 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:03 am

Stormcloaks are anti-Altmer and that is why I go with them. The Altmer are the real enemy here IMHO. They have their fingers in everything attempting to direct the outcome. Smart, yes. Unsavory, yes.

Thalmor.
Altmer =/= Thalmor.

Thalmor were originally nothing more than a puppet goverment of Valenwood, created by Altmer primarily to fight the piracy that plagues Summerset (and were officially dissolved when Tiber Septim conquered Summerset).
After that, none of the three sides of Altmeri civil war (Traditionalist, Imperial Symathizers and The Beautiful) respected them... you might as well say that Thalmor was a joke to them.

Than the Oblivion Crisis happened and through lies and deceit, Thalmor grew in power. Soon they started slaughtering the Altmeri Kings and nobility and slaughtered every Altmer who did not support the Thalmor. If you met the Altmer Legionaire in Rift, he would tell you a story that would reveal why the Thalmor may have REALLY attacked Hammerfell (a province that means little to the Thalmor): many Altmer lived there and Thalmor wanted to slaughter every one of them. "The Great War" says that Thalmor retreated due to Redguards kicking their ass, but after this story I wonder if they retreated simply because they finished their mission.

With that said, Stormcloacks are (interestingly) not anti-Altmer. The two Altmer who live in Windhelm are greately trusted by the Nords, to the point that they would put their life in hands of the Altmer stall merchant should the Thalmor somehow conquer Windhelm (as shown by a conversation bet ween the merchant and a Talos worshipper).
And honestly, these two Altmer are all the proof that the Stormcloakcs are NOT racist (thats not to say that they are as tolerant as the Empire). Else, these two members of the race that Thalmor represents would not be in the city, yet alone highly respected and trusted.

Thats just my feeling from talking to people in game, and an objection to the people claiming that half the nords are for ulfric and half for tullius. Its clearly NOT a 50/50 divide.

Stormcloack Nords are just more loud (and hot-blooded) than the calmer Imperial Nords so it is to be expected that you won't get the smae impression from simply speaking to people.

Seconded! Legion doesn't sit too well with me. They're nothing but trouble.

State of most provinces while there is Tamrielic empire: stability and peace most of the time.
State of most provinces while there is no Tamrielic empire: anarchy and constant wars.

It is not for no reason that the Empire survived for so long (I am here talking about all five Empires: Alessian, Reman, Akaviri Potentate, Septim, Mede) and why ther are so many people in every province (even in Summerset Empire was popular... and Altmer had the least reason to like them) minus Morrowind (where imperial Authority was non-existent due to Tribunal's cunningness) who support the "Opressor".

In summary, saying that they are nothing but trouble is terrible jumping to conclusion... but than again, Stormcloacks do like jumping to conclusions.

My fear is that, with how and when Ulfric chose to use the power of the voice, this may, to some degree, have corrupted him, turning him away from a divine path. Naturally, I do not assume that the degree to which Ulfric may have been tainted by his own actions is anywhere near what is encountered in the Winterhold quest line. However, I do believe that the amount is sufficient to warrant a reasonable amount of concern.

Ulfric is definitely not a Saint. Alongside historical evidence (squashing the Forsworn Rebellion (which is identical to what he does now), slaughter of Reachmen cilivians, being a Thalmor agent (he aoon broke all contact with them soon true but the fact remains: he is not that clean concerning the Thalmor as some claim it)), but we also have few Jarl's not trusting him too much (even if they support him) and even the Stormcloak soldiers start to doubt his niceness with time (as shown through Ralof).

The Empire's professional, organized and resourceful army has quite a difficult time eliminationg a 'rebellion' (in that there is a stalemate until the Dragonborn intervenes).

Of course they will have a difficult time. This is a Cyro-Nord Empire and it was always a common knowledge that majority of its army is Cyro-Nord (both in Septim and Medes Empires). If it happened in any other provinces, the rebellion would be ended soon as other races make only small (insignificant) part of the Legions. But Skyrim Civil War means that a big bunch of Empire's Legion (and youth trained to fight for the Empire) is now the enemy of the Empire. Skyrim is the province that would be hardest to re-conquer (well besides maybe Black Marsh and its "hospitable" terrain).

High Rock is a wild card. Hammerfell is crucial for whoever wants to win the war, and Hammerfell has a lot more reason to unite with the Skyrim than it does the Empire.

High Rock would want the Reach, which was given to Skyrim by Talos, back and they may not be too entertained by Ulfric's buthering of Reachmen which are a Breton people.

Nords don't seem to like Redguards much for some reason (the "Warmaiden" says she would have been kicked out of Whiterun if she were not married to a Nord and youwoul expect them to treat the anti-Thalmoric Ali'k better as well) so doubt these would two ally either.

And lets not start about how in history Skyrim was constantly violent towards these two races, ALWAYS attempting to spread its borders over their lands (and in other times helepd Cyrodiil conquer them). High Rock and Hammerfell have little love for Skyrim.

Redguards and Bretons may actually form their own alliance should the need arise (their relations have been getting better throughout history) and the mix of Warrior/Mage nations would make them a formidable defensive against the Thalmor. And since they don't need Skyrim in alliance and both have lands Skyrim took from them... it is quite likely that Skyrim would get invaded by these two... especially after Civil War weakened it.

And what must be done? The Stormcloaks are more eager to destroy the Dominion than the Empire, that's good enough.

Nords are just more straight-forward than the Cyrodiilians which tend to believe in discipline and calm preparations.
Also, if Imperials did not want to fight the Thalmor, they would not constantly speak as if they are preparing for a war against them.

Well first off I would like to ask didn't the nords come from up north and slowly go down south into tamriel and skyrim? Just wondering. But anyways...

Nords came from Atmora, stole Skyrim from Falmer and Aldmer who lived there and... well, thats it. Cyrodiilians sometimes claim they are descendants of Nords (to strenghten the alliance with Skyrim they had since the First (Alessian) Empire), but they are actually Nedic and were in Tamriel before the Nords came. Bretons are also Nedic.

However, first Nordic Empire (which existed alongside the Alessian Empire they helped form and were tightly connected to) conquered Morrowind, High Rock and (I think) Hammerfell so they did spread, just not south...

Buying time doesnt work when the other side gains more than you do. The WGC makes the empire weaker not stronger.

Seeing as Elves need more time to get back onto their feet (due to slow reproduction and usual Elven slowness), Imperials have the upper hand here...
...until you take into consideration what we know about Thalmor but Empire doesn't

They're never going to. The Stormcloaks want independent Skyrim. Any confrontation with the Thalmor is going to be a desperate defense of the province itself, not the crusade some of them may fantasize about.

Knowing Ulfric, he may invade for no other reason but to become a hero Nords would talk about for generations.
And Nords are suicidal by nature. Unless their Cyrodiilian brethren are there to calm them down, you never know what madness they may attempt after drinking some mead ^_^; (but thats what I love about them)
User avatar
Daniel Brown
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 11:21 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:13 pm

You've still yet to define these 'underhand tactics,' and cite examples of them within TES history. When Nords talk about Honor, I'm almost certain they mean the honor of battle, not noble tactics. Sure, they have a distrust of magic, that's about the only thing they won't use. And it hasn't stopped them before (long term), the Nords have been very successful in the art of warfare.
Their treatment of Balgruuf is a prime example.
Tullius tells his 2nd to tell Balgruuf what Ulfric is planning, and embellish it if necessary.
Ulfric tells Balgruuf what he is planning directly. Some dont like that he attacked Balgruuf, but the point is he gave him fair warning not lies.
Who cares if he lied? That doesn't change the fact that Ulfric was the one planning on attacking whiterun. What's a little white lie in a sea of distrust?

The question I responded to was about underhandedness. Its not at all underhanded to attack a city in time of war.
User avatar
мistrєss
 
Posts: 3168
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:13 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:18 am

And by 'has been betrayed' you mean, 'is a traitor who betrayed.'

The Empire has betrayed Ulfric's ideals and beliefs. Acting like that is more concrete and important that actual treason against the laws and rightful ruler of your country... derp.

We dont really know what agreements were made way back when Skyrim joined the empire. Im of a mind to think that some promises were made that Skyrim's ways would be honored and the empire has recently broken that agreement. Its extremely doubtful that Skyrim owes allegiance to the empire with no conditions at all.


Arthur: Be quiet! I order you to be quiet!
Woman: Order, eh? Who does he think he is?
Arthur: I am your king!
Woman: Well I didn't vote for you!
Arthur: You don't vote for kings.
Woman: Well how'd you become king then?

This is the point of it. By what right does the emperor require allegiance? Tradition? Or historical agreement?
User avatar
Antony Holdsworth
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 4:50 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:23 am

We dont really know what agreements were made way back when Skyrim joined the empire. Im of a mind to think that some promises were made that Skyrim's ways would be honored and the empire has recently broken that agreement. Its extremely doubtful that Skyrim owes allegiance to the empire with no conditions at all.
There are no conditions. This isn't a democracy, it's an empire. Skyrim joined the empire because they swore fealty to a divinely-powerful warlord who led them to glory. It's despotism, just heaven-mandated despotism. Or was, to be precise.

By what right does the emperor require allegiance? Tradition? Or historical agreement?
The former for sure. But mostly because he is the emperor and you are his subject. He owns you. This is something of a problem with authoritarian government, because when the legitimacy of the regime declines, as Cyrodiil's has in the Fourth Era, it can still demand complete obedience under pain of death.

Edit: Not that Skyrim's hereditary rulers have any more legitimacy than that. Skyrim has been in the Empire long enough to claim the same legitimacy as the Jarls and High King.
User avatar
REVLUTIN
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 8:44 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:34 pm

And by 'has been betrayed' you mean, 'is a traitor who betrayed.'

The Empire has betrayed Ulfric's ideals and beliefs. Acting like that is more concrete and important that actual treason against the laws and rightful ruler of your country... derp.

from the jarl's own mouth who hired him who is a empire supporter is where u will fidn the answer, Ulfric was not a traitor right after the war, why would the empire hire him and his men and why would ulfric let himself be hired by the very people hes betrayed....just to say that the whole markarth incedent is WHEN Ulfric became a "traitor" to the Empire BECAUSE the Empire hired Ulfric and his men to retake the Reach in exchange for safe and protected place to worship talos, the Empire BETRAYED Ulfric FIRST to the Thalmor to save themselves from getting into another war to soon with the thalmor. So how is Ulfric a traitor to the very Empire that he served that betrayed and sold HIM OUT? Ulfric sent to prison for 10 years and "escapes".
User avatar
LADONA
 
Posts: 3290
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:52 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:56 am

from the jarl's own mouth who hired him who is a empire supporter is where u will fidn the answer, Ulfric was not a traitor right after the war, why would the empire hire him and his men and why would ulfric let himself be hired by the very people hes betrayed....just to say that the whole markarth incedent is WHEN Ulfric became a "traitor" to the Empire BECAUSE the Empire hired Ulfric and his men to retake the Reach in exchange for safe and protected place to worship talos, the Empire BETRAYED Ulfric FIRST to the Thalmor to save themselves from getting into another war to soon with the thalmor. So how is Ulfric a traitor to the very Empire that he served that betrayed and sold HIM OUT? Ulfric sent to prison for 10 years and "escapes".
He was put in prison for violating the law, then he killed his king. Pretty straightforward.
User avatar
Angel Torres
 
Posts: 3553
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:08 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:08 am

He was put in prison for violating the law, then he killed his king. Pretty straightforward.

then basically because he didnt get what his Empire had promised him, hes getting his back with interest. Also he dueled his king and his king lost, Ulfric's goign by Skyrim's rules since obviously the Empire is kinda lost in that department with them saying Ok this is fine and then turns right around and arrests ya for what they said was ok. Notice why u never hear the common empire local and population even bring up the duel? hell they problemly didnt even know it took place or else there be alot less people mad at Ulfric orthinking him as a murderer.
User avatar
Eilidh Brian
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:45 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:02 pm

then basically because he didnt get what his Empire had promised him, hes getting his back with interest.
What'd they promise him? Free dental?

When you break the law, you forfeit what is owed to you.

Also he dueled his king and his king lost, Ulfric's goign by Skyrim's rules since obviously the Empire is kinda lost in that department with them saying Ok this is fine and then turns right around and arrests ya for what they said was ok.
High Kings are elected. You can't just kill them if you shout "I challenge you!" Otherwise the loser faction would just kill the guy that got more votes.

Ulfric is using a flimsy excuse for his murder and dressing it up as ancient Nord custom. Like Queen Elizabeth trying to behead a member of Parliament for insolence. He knew his action would be taken as murder. That's why he rushed into the palace before anyone could realize his intent, and used Thu'um to kill the king before anyone could intervene.
User avatar
Phillip Brunyee
 
Posts: 3510
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:43 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:33 am

There are no conditions. This isn't a democracy, it's an empire. Skyrim joined the empire because they swore fealty to a divinely-powerful warlord who led them to glory. It's despotism, just heaven-mandated despotism. Or was, to be precise.


The former for sure. But mostly because he is the emperor and you are his subject. He owns you. This is something of a problem with authoritarian government, because when the legitimacy of the regime declines, as Cyrodiil's has in the Fourth Era, it can still demand complete obedience under pain of death.


Thats the thing though. The legitimate reasons for Skyrim joining the empire have long past. They dont OWE allegiance for all eternity no matter what. Skyrim leaving the empire is not treason.
User avatar
*Chloe*
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:34 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:03 am

Thats the thing though. The legitimate reasons for Skyrim joining the empire have long past. They dont OWE allegiance for all eternity no matter what. Skyrim leaving the empire is not treason.
You don't get how pre-modern political systems work.

Skyrim doesn't get to leave the empire any more than a man in the middle ages gets to be openly gay and athiest.
User avatar
Erin S
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:06 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:37 pm

The Empire owed and promised Ulfric a safe place and protection for him and his men to freely worship Talos. Now at the time Ulfric was an Empire's man, loyal to the empire and the Empire that hes loyal to said sure, u retake this city for us and we promise a safe place to worship talos and we will protect you.

Then Thalmor shows up and Empire shoves Ulfric at them after promising him protection and a place to worship. Weither or not it was against the law between the Empire and the Thalmor, it was an agreement that the Empire didnt uphold.
User avatar
Lakyn Ellery
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:02 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:14 am

The Empire owed and promised Ulfric a safe place and protection for him and his men to freely worship Talos. Now at the time Ulfric was an Empire's man, loyal to the empire and the Empire that hes loyal to said sure, u retake this city for us and we promise a safe place to worship talos and we will protect you.
That's simply false.

Igmund Silver-Blood offered him free worship. Big difference. He is a Jarl who routinely flouts Imperial interests. The Empire would never have allowed that deal.

Ulfric broke the law, at Igmund's invitation. Igmund got away with it because the Empire needs him to mine silver. But now he has to pay host to a Thalmor mission because he has proven himself unreliable.
User avatar
Tina Tupou
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:37 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:31 pm

The question I responded to was about underhandedness. Its not at all underhanded to attack a city in time of war.
It's not underhanded, but it is certaintly dikeish.

The Legion atleast tried every means at their disposal before even considering attacking Whiterun.

What did Ulfric do? He sent him an axe as an offering, then straight up attacked when Balgruuf declined. No negotiations after that. No talking at all. Just asking once then attacking when they say 'no'.

I don't know about you, but my money is on the guy who knows when to change tactics.
User avatar
Donatus Uwasomba
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 7:22 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:29 am

I chose the Stormcloaks but to be honest they are racist. Racism is simply the preventing someone from achieving something based on race. Unless there is a province where someone who is not an ethnic majority can become a ruler ie a Jarl in Skyrim then every province is inherently racist. Its not like Skyrim was ever liberal enough to allow a wise great non-Nord to rise to the position of Jarl (unless there is an Imperial Jarl that I dont know about) under the Empire's rule. Thus Skyrim was inherently racist before the civil war so Stormcloak control wont make the land more racist than it already is. Considering that my character was an Orc helping the Stormcloaks win could help in stalling a bigger problem which was bigotry. So racism was not a factor in my decision.
User avatar
Rob Davidson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:52 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim