Sorry , buts thats bull. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_balance
Yeah i know, its just wiki, but at the end of the day there IS a definition of balanced, which is an equivalence in potency of the various options.
What you are arguing is that one may be please with and enjoy an imbalanced state. Not that we dont agree on what is to be called "balance".
Oh I did. If I didnt, I would not be posting, I would be playing something else. I have settled on a Conjuration/Archery character i really am liking so far.
That doesnt stop me from seeing issues with it.
This is a very good, and often overlooked point. "If the only reason you hate socialized medicine is because it pays for abortions, then you need to argue against abortions, not against socialized medicine." Classic confusion of the issue. It happens a lot, we all do it, and lawyers love to nail you on it.
The game can be incredibly enjoyable. The game might even be perfectly playable in all respects. That, however, does not mean that it is adequately balanced. A lot of players have a great time playing any build, at whatever difficulty, and don't mind the differences at all, myself included. However, that subjective appreciation of the game does not actually mean that the game is objectively balanced in the sense of various strategies having, overall, the same effect.
In fact, this is certainly not the case. Skyrim is very unbalanced. It's fun, in fact it's marvelous to play. But it is still very unbalanced. And balance is a question of math, not opinion. Numbers can demonstrate that a game is balanced or it isn't, and the mathematics of Skyrim are very skewed. Some back-of-the-envelope calculations have put Melee and Destruction at a 500:1 power ratio for a level 55 character. That's pretty horrible balance. I'm not saying it needs to be 1:1, or even 5:1, but
five hundred times the combat effectiveness is egregious.