Don't defend Bethesda

Post » Thu May 17, 2012 11:42 pm

and to the guy that started this post i don't like when all these people defend it neither. I say if you spend your hard earned money on a game,you have the right to complain and state your opinion until you're blue in the face. tbh i think they all are kissing bethesda's ass on this site and hoping and praying they get noticed. :rofl: & they will not

Exactly, I'm on here because the game has problems that need fixing and realistically Bethesda should offer some sort of free DLC for all the problems like other companies have done in the past. Other people that are defending are just trying to justify their 64 bucks. If Bethesda offered a full refund I would take it in a heartbeat, mail back their beta version of the game and politely shut up and wait for a full retail ready release. No one defending them seems to understand that they are just beta testers and those who buy the GOTY or whatever next version comes out will be the actual customers who get to enjoy every second of the game. No matter what people say, good or bad, the truth of this game was not ready for release and should of been held back another 6 months for testing and it really bugs me that they came out with a schedule for the patches. Seriously!? How about ASAP for a schedule...don't tell me to wait until mid to late Jan. for quest bug fixes. Terrible, just terrible. Oh and to those defenders who said other companies release buggy games too, first I agree that's why i mentioned Dead Island, which is still sitting collecting dust because it was broken when it came out and I haven't gone back and second, Bethesda is a huge company with a ton of giant games already under their belt. Fixes should be a lot easier to identify and fix by now.......
User avatar
Cameron Garrod
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:46 am

Post » Thu May 17, 2012 11:53 pm

Exactly, I'm on here because the game has problems that need fixing and realistically Bethesda should offer some sort of free DLC for all the problems like other companies have done in the past. Other people that are defending are just trying to justify their 64 bucks. If Bethesda offered a full refund I would take it in a heartbeat, mail back their beta version of the game and politely shut up and wait for a full retail ready release. No one defending them seems to understand that they are just beta testers and those who buy the GOTY or whatever next version comes out will be the actual customers who get to enjoy every second of the game. No matter what people say, good or bad, the truth of this game was not ready for release and should of been held back another 6 months for testing and it really bugs me that they came out with a schedule for the patches. Seriously!? How about ASAP for a schedule...don't tell me to wait until mid to late Jan. for quest bug fixes. Terrible, just terrible. Oh and to those defenders who said other companies release buggy games too, first I agree that's why i mentioned Dead Island, which is still sitting collecting dust because it was broken when it came out and I haven't gone back and second, Bethesda is a huge company with a ton of giant games already under their belt. Fixes should be a lot easier to identify and fix by now.......

They have already annouced they are working on quick fix for resitances issue and the claimed but ive never seen backwards dragon. whats funny about people who go on about dlc, you whine they are not fixing issues that you claim are there yet you want them to introduce something new for free.

hired dead island and have no game breaking issues, on every game you cant play do you say its broken,
User avatar
lauren cleaves
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:35 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 10:03 am

My opinion is this.

Bethesda developed an enormous and intricately detailed game with a release date set over a year ago. The technical issues will most probably be dealt with and worked on over the holidays and barring Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, Boxing Day and New Year's Day, they will probably be still working on it every other day. However, this does not apply to Microsoft or their "at least 2 week long" validation process. I predicted the second week of january for patch 1.3 for this very reason. The patch will be ready by about Christmas, but given the certification process and the other platforms, we shouldn't expect to see it before mid-January.

As for "how terribly broken" Skyrim is(n't), FNV broke permanently for me on my first playthrough after about 100 hours (I'm at 250 hours on Skyrim thus far, and it's still far from unplayable). Since then, I've had about another 4 separate FNV playthroughs which all died at some point, even post the HH patch. I'm waiting for LR to go on DotW before I get it and start yet AGAIN one final time. By comparison, my opinion is that any game will be at it's most glitchy/broken within the first 2 months after release, and if these problems with Skyrim are THE WORST it's ever going to be, then that's pretty damn good in my book, especially given the 360's increasingly antiquated hardware.

So yes, I defend Bethesda and I most certainly don't hate or blame them. They've consistently gotten better at patching these games up to the point where we may even see a totally glitchless Bethesda RPG within the next 5 years; and whilst that may seem "expected" or "normal" for some of you to expect this from every game that you play, be advised of the immense scale of a project like Skyrim and that the mere concept of having a glitchless RPG of this magnitude is like speculating that they'll be able to manufacture the Holy Grail itself en masse and bring about world peace. (
User avatar
sw1ss
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:02 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 4:17 am

Lol stop saying we're paying for the beta version. Minecraft did that and it was better than the full release lol.

But all jokes aside, There's something [censored] weird here. I haven't even got the day 1 patch, and the only bugs I've encountered are the funny ones (like mammoths skydiving...)
Other than the occasionnal crash on loading, I have NO problem with the game. What theh ell, am I not playing the same game as you are?
EDIT: and if you combine my 6 characters, I must have around 120 hours played already, if not more
User avatar
Veronica Martinez
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:43 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 8:22 am

I agree to absolutely nothing. How do I even know about the terms of the product until I unbox it and read the EULA? The law means there is no premise of assumption. It is not sufficient to assume that because I've bought games before that I ought to know what I'm in for. If you honestly believe that the hobby of gaming involves liking or lumping a poor QA of software then it's you who ought to find a new hobby. Not only is your (wrong) opinion insulting to people who are experiencing issues, it's shameful and suggests that being a gamer is synonymous with not having any consumer rights.

Software isn't other products, and that is exactly why a metaphor or anology is used because if it was the same thing you wouldn't be accepting it - that's the whole bloody point. At what point in the history of gaming and software products did it become the accepted practice to remain silent on known issues? Where is the line meant to be drawn? At a patch that breaks more than it fixes? What about a fix for a known issue that doesn't universally fix the issue but is treated as if it has fixed it in spite of mounting evidence to the contrary?


its software license for one thing, software licenses are not same thing as buying a toaster that does not work. the eula just for the ones who not worked it out stands for End-User License Agreement,
shops and amazon all say if you open it you accept it, regardless of liceneses in the box. also on the back of the box if internet is needed for example(steam game) then it states this so if you open the box then tough luck if you dont have internet in case like that. if the shop did not sell it sealed then you could return it and get refund as unwanted but youll be laughed out the shop if you claim its faulty when you tried to play it

anyone who thinks any game is going to come out without some issues is in for a shock, the difference is they will try and fix issues. if it came out and they said no patches then i could understand the whining.
User avatar
Sharra Llenos
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:09 pm

Post » Thu May 17, 2012 9:15 pm

fix the damn issue or give me my money back.

but they are fixing it...
User avatar
Irmacuba
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:54 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 2:16 am

Don't defend Bethesda!
User avatar
Kayleigh Williams
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 5:54 am

What all of these people who hate on Bethesda/Skyrim keep failing to understand, is that people having problems with the game are the minority. So yes people will defend the game because far less people are having issues than people who are not. I personally have not had one issue with the game, nor has anyone I know personally who has played it(which I will admit is less than 15). Yes people who have a buggy game it svcks for you, but you can not expect the majority of people to not defend Bethesda when they have had good play experiences. Yes you are entitled to voice you concern and opinion, but you have no right to expect anyone else to agree with you. I would not expect anyone who has suffered the most severe bugs of the game to have the opinion as me.
User avatar
Fanny Rouyé
 
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:47 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 2:46 am

Well at this point I think they know how we feel. I hope they keep making awesome games and I hope they step it up when it comes to QA.

People are just mad because it's heartbreaking to see such a good game be pretty much unplayable.
User avatar
Mistress trades Melissa
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:28 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 11:06 am

What all of these people who hate on Bethesda/Skyrim keep failing to understand, is that people having problems with the game are the minority. So yes people will defend the game because far less people are having issues than people who are not. I personally have not had one issue with the game, nor has anyone I know personally who has played it(which I will admit is less than 15). Yes people who have a buggy game it svcks for you, but you can not expect the majority of people to not defend Bethesda when they have had good play experiences. Yes you are entitled to voice you concern and opinion, but you have no right to expect anyone else to agree with you. I would not expect anyone who has suffered the most severe bugs of the game to have the opinion as me.
For the most part completely Agree... but with a slight remark.
There is no certainty that there is majority/minority on either side of the fence. However people have to realize that only a very small percentage of Skyrim consumers subscribes to boards like these.
And though either side is allowed to express their opinion, currently the board is getting flooded with threads like this one.
The reason I visist this forum is to post the problems I have so that the developers can fix 'em. And to find possible workarounds in order to avoid/solve bugs.
A great example is this Thread:
http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1295941-repairing-the-phial-briar-heart-glitch/
It describes the problem, describes the possible causes.. (to developers can look into the cause) and a workaround is posted.
I
User avatar
Josh Sabatini
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:47 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 6:21 am

in a game this large and complex there are going to be glitches, That is a simple fact.

When I was a Moderator at OblivionSource we heard the same complaint about Oblivion.


So, If you don't want to put up with the glitches that you know will be part of the game DONT BUY THE GAME.
User avatar
Sara Lee
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:40 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 9:31 am

Lol stop saying we're paying for the beta version. Minecraft did that and it was better than the full release lol.

But all jokes aside, There's something [censored] weird here. I haven't even got the day 1 patch, and the only bugs I've encountered are the funny ones (like mammoths skydiving...)
Other than the occasionnal crash on loading, I have NO problem with the game. What theh ell, am I not playing the same game as you are?
EDIT: and if you combine my 6 characters, I must have around 120 hours played already, if not more
You have 6 characters and only 120 hours of gameplay? I question how much of the game you actually played. It sounds like your playstyle svcks and is boring. :poke:
User avatar
Sylvia Luciani
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 8:18 am

I once tried to create a simple Make Your Own Adventure book. It was an absolute nightmare trying to keep track of all the different pages.

So now all I have to do is imagine Skyrim in bookform and I tend to give Bethesda a break when a bug pops up.


Skyrim the make your own adventure book;

You arrived at a little cottage. There is a box next to cottage door. A woman is standing outside the cottage.
A path leads north.
What do you want to do?
-Investigate box: Go to page 53.427.698
-Open door : Go to page 334.526.378
-Talk to woman : Go to page 888.574.633
-Move North : Go to page 443.334.568
-Go back south: Go to page 873.334.578
:blink:
User avatar
krystal sowten
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:25 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 8:58 am

There's no need to bash up the OP. He has his points, others have theirs. Just let him vent, damn.
User avatar
Matt Terry
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 10:58 am

Post » Thu May 17, 2012 11:45 pm

What all of these people who hate on Bethesda/Skyrim keep failing to understand, is that people having problems with the game are the minority. So yes people will defend the game because far less people are having issues than people who are not. I personally have not had one issue with the game, nor has anyone I know personally who has played it(which I will admit is less than 15). Yes people who have a buggy game it svcks for you, but you can not expect the majority of people to not defend Bethesda when they have had good play experiences. Yes you are entitled to voice you concern and opinion, but you have no right to expect anyone else to agree with you. I would not expect anyone who has suffered the most severe bugs of the game to have the opinion as me.
The statements that you've made that are bolded really intrigue me. You have absolutely no evidence to suggest that this is the case. Your notion that the majority of Skyrim players are not having any prblems comes strictly from your own head.

The poll I've linked below for the PS3 version shows that, in a survey of over 26 thousand players, more than 75% had problems with the game. And this poll was only about lag. It didn't even get into broken quests and the myriad of other glitches that people are dealing with. I'd say the majority is clearly on the other side. I haven't found a survey specific to the 360 version post-patch 1.2 but I'm guessing the numbers would be quite similar.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/121/1213194p1.html
User avatar
Agnieszka Bak
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 9:14 am

The statements that you've made that are bolded really intrigue me. You have absolutely no evidence to suggest that this is the case. Your notion that the majority of Skyrim players are not having any prblems comes strictly from your own head.

The poll I've linked below for the PS3 version shows that, in a survey of over 26 thousand players, more than 75% had problems with the game. And this poll was only about lag. It didn't even get into broken quests and the myriad of other glitches that people are dealing with. I'd say the majority is clearly on the other side. I haven't found a survey specific to the 360 version post-patch 1.2 but I'm guessing the numbers would be quite similar.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/121/1213194p1.html

I've noticed that when those who don't have problems post defensive statements like 'the majority are fine get off Bethesda's back' the two seem to be mutually exclusive. I still can't, for the life of me, fathom why people would continuously disparage and diminish those of us who are quite clearly having terminal issues with the game. I mean, what's to argue about? If someone says it is broken for them, why is that so hard to believe?

I wouldn't BE here if the game worked as it should.
User avatar
Alyesha Neufeld
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:45 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 12:41 pm

You guys defending the developer are wrong and just making a case for developers to release a broken game to profit from it at a certain time, (Xmas) then take months and months to fix it till its able to play the way it should. Bethesda even stated they are taking the holidays off and won't get to Quest fixes till sometime in January maybe. That is terrible. So you have a bunch of people sitting there with a quest list that can't be completed while the developers bathe in the money. Yea its a big game, but its not their first and they shouldn't be given any excuses for taking so long with the patches. Taking the holidays off? I get a three day weekend where I work and that's it. So how about they do the same and start rolling those patches out now. This game is collecting dust on my shelf and will continue to do so until they properly fix it. I should sell it and wait for the GOTY edition a year from now when the MIGHT have all the problems fixed. I have better games to play that actually work, but congratulations Bethesda you svckered me out of my money. Enjoy it.


I HAVE YET TO BUY ANY TITLE that wasn't buggy,including and no limited to xbox arcade titles.
Which by the way are the worse for bugs in any game AND THEY HARDLY EVER GET FIXED(arcade titles)BUT THESE BUGS ARE BEING DONE BY THE CHEATERS(MODDERS as they think they are).
Second NO UPDATE(S) get released UNTIL XBOX APROVES THEM.
Must svck to be you only getting 3 days of for the holiday's..
i take a total of 5 1/2 MONTHS off starting the last week AUG.(BUT THEN I DON'T have to work for someone else)even the 15 people that work for me have to take the time off
User avatar
Jessie Rae Brouillette
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:50 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 5:17 am

Thats right, I created my account the day dragons started flying backwards. I did so because I am really frustrated with patches that make things worse and a total lack of response/feedback from Bethesda to a gigantic wave of criticism regarding Skyrim.

It clearly states that Bethesda "monitors" their forum for issues regarding Skyrim. Where else should we complain? How else shopuld we go about expressing extreme displeasure when a company fails to fix issues and instead makes things worse?

Still waiting for information about when the next patch will be released, Bethesda.
User avatar
Alex Vincent
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:31 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 5:53 am

Thats right, I created my account the day dragons started flying backwards. I did so because I am really frustrated with patches that make things worse and a total lack of response/feedback from Bethesda to a gigantic wave of criticism regarding Skyrim.

It clearly states that Bethesda "monitors" their forum for issues regarding Skyrim. Where else should we complain? How else shopuld we go about expressing extreme displeasure when a company fails to fix issues and instead makes things worse?

Still waiting for information about when the next patch will be released, Bethesda.

Later this week, PC first (since they control updates there), PS3/360 after (must go through certification check)
User avatar
Lori Joe
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:10 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 4:23 am

Later this week, PC first (since they control updates there), PS3/360 after (must go through certification check)

How the HELL did the 1.2 patch pass the certification?
User avatar
Bellismydesi
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:25 am

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 8:45 am

I HAVE YET TO BUY ANY TITLE that wasn't buggy,including and no limited to xbox arcade titles.

Can the Bethesda-apologists please stop using the "What game isn't buggy when it's released?" argument over and over again? Please? You're missing the point by a mile. I've played Oblivion. I've played Fallout 3. I've played a number of other "big" games, and I certainly know to expect that number of bugs will invariably be present in a game upon release, especially in one this vast in scope. Was I expecting some bugs? Sure. I'd be an idiot not to.

But that's not the point.

The point is, we're a month in and we still have broken questlines and a patch (1.2) that by many accounts seems to have done more harm than good. This is not progress. And whether or not you personally (not you specifically, but by "you" I mean those with the "I'm not having any problems, so quit whining!" attitudes) have been experiencing any issues is quite irrelevant and doesn't diminish the validity of the complaints of others.
User avatar
Laura Simmonds
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:27 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 12:16 am

Can the Bethesda-apologists please stop using the "What game isn't buggy when it's released?" argument over and over again? Please? You're missing the point by a mile. I've played Oblivion. I've played Fallout 3. I've played a number of other "big" games, and I certainly know to expect that number of bugs will invariably be present in a game upon release, especially in one this vast in scope. Was I expecting some bugs? Sure. I'd be an idiot not to.

But that's not the point.

The point is, we're a month in and we still have broken questlines and a patch (1.2) that by many accounts seems to have done more harm than good. This is not progress. And whether or not you personally (not you specifically, but by "you" I mean those with the "I'm not having any problems, so quit whining!" attitudes) have been experiencing any issues is quite irrelevant and doesn't diminish the validity of the complaints of others.

Well put.
User avatar
Maeva
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:27 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 9:07 am

Theres other games where bugs never got fixed or even addressed. People also seem to forget that FO3 broke when one of the DLC got released, NV was hit hard with day 1 issues and what not. While its not ok that it should happened its not something to be surprised about

How the HELL did the 1.2 patch pass the certification?


You would have to inquire with MS/Sony, Sony approved the patch first
User avatar
Claire Jackson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:38 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 2:55 am

Theres other games where bugs never got fixed or even addressed. People also seem to forget that FO3 broke when one of the DLC got released, NV was hit hard with day 1 issues and what not. While its not ok that it should happened its not something to be surprised about

Whether it's surprising or not is irrelevant. You told someone squarely on page one of this thread that "Until you understand programming, you have no cause to complain." which is just flat-out wrong. By that rationale, if you go out to a restaurant, order a medium-rare steak, and get a medium-well steak delivered to you, then the waiter can say, "Until you understand the complexities of grilling, you have no cause to complain." That's ridiculous. You're paying for the damned thing. If it's "too difficult" for you to deliver what your customers expect, then you try harder, or you get out of the business.

I've worked in the customer service industry for 23 years. Guess what? Customers/consumers/patrons don't want to hear "It was too difficult for us to give you what you wanted." If it's too difficult then you don't sell it. You don't offer it on the menu. You certainly don't say "Yep, it's ready." and then package it and put it on the shelves.

This game could have done with at least another two months worth of bug-testing/fixing, but then, it wouldn't have been available in time for Christmas, and we can't have that now, can we? So now we have a shoddy product on two platforms and a may-as-well-be-broken product on PS3. All because Bethesda's quality control takes a backseat to release date considerations, and they get away with it because of their large fanbase of apologists who just can't bring themselves to scrutinize them, which only perpetuates the problem.
User avatar
Breanna Van Dijk
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:18 pm

Post » Fri May 18, 2012 3:20 am

Whether it's surprising or not is irrelevant. You told someone squarely on page one of this thread that "Until you understand programming, you have no cause to complain." which is just flat-out wrong. By that rationale, if you go out to a restaurant, order a medium-rare steak, and get a medium-well steak delivered to you, then the waiter can say, "Until you understand the complexities of grilling, you have no cause to complain." That's ridiculous. You're paying for the damned thing. If it's "too difficult" for you to deliver what your customers expect, then you try harder, or you get out of the business.

I've worked in the customer service industry for 23 years. Guess what? Customers/consumers/patrons don't want to hear "It was too difficult for us to give you what you wanted." If it's too difficult then you don't sell it. You don't offer it on the menu. You certainly don't say "Yep, it's ready." and then package it and put it on the shelves.

This game could have done with at least another two months worth of bug-testing/fixing, but then, it wouldn't have been available in time for Christmas, and we can't have that now, can we? So now we have a shoddy product on two platforms and a may-as-well-be-broken product on PS3. All because Bethesda's quality control takes a backseat to release date considerations, and they get away with it because of their large fanbase of apologists who just can't bring themselves to scrutinize them, which only perpetuates the problem.

Grilling a steak is not the same as programming complex code. Thats like comparing First Aid you can do at home to major surgery.

I say that "Until you understand programming, you have no cause to complain." because people have absolutely no idea how an issue is caused just that its happening so to them it should be so easy to fix. Its these types of people that make Technical Support such a hard job as they think that a switch should be flicked and issue resolved or that is so easy to remove a patch in the mean time while a new fix is done. I have never one told my customers that 'its too difficult for us' anyone in the CS industry that uses that will be out of a job quick.

How do you know another 2 months of testing would have fixed it? because thats the time it will probably take after release to stabalize? You do understand the fallacy in that argument right? There are maybe 50-100 maybe 200 testers tops. 2 months they may have only run into the handful of issues players have run into. Bugs are easier to find post release because the simple fact that, there are more people to go through more variables than just a smaller sample can get.

Its also just easier to find someone to blame (Bethesda) when issues arise even though it may have been out of their control to see. Its very possible the game checked ok and that quite simply at the time the code was good to go. You can only speculate and assume what happened durig the development process and because you feel slighted in the whole ordeal it makes you feel better to lay complete blame on the Company for the issues. Maybe Im just a bit more understanding that issues happen.
User avatar
rheanna bruining
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:00 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim