Just trying to figure out your logic is all. You claim I'll buy anything because I bought Skyrim. You bought Skyrim but aren't the type to buy just anything. Fallacy or just angry typing?
Stating the rediculously obvious fact that "game breaking" is something that renders the game unplayable and not fit throwing because you don't like something; what game breaking bug existed for the Xbox prior to 1.2?
Ok you implied that the amount of bugs in this game is normal and that we should expect it to be that way. As such, I said that developers must like you because they can sell you anything and you won't complain. The key is that I said they can
sell you anything. I didn't say you would buy anything.
The point is that neither of us knew that the game would be ridden with bugs. Upon discovering that it is, my response is to be upset. Your response, apparently, is to smile and take it. Of course in all liklihood, you are not experiencing these issues with your copy of the game. That's probably the reason you're in here making inane, useless comments in a subforum that is actually created for the purpose of exposing and addressing technical problems.
Your definition of "broken" is totally absurd. So you think that as long as you can actually turn on the game and move the character around the screen, everything is just fine? Thanks for clearing that up! Here I was thinking that the fact that all of the resistences are not working, some quests are completely broken and the graphical detail has deteriorated to Gamecube levels meant that the game wasn't working. Good thing you pointed out that everything is just fine.
Obviously games are supposed to be fun. When the whole thing deteriorates beyond the point where it's fun anymore, I'd say it's broken. Broken, means it's not working the way that it's supposed to. If we define a game-breaker only as something that means the game litterally won't even boot up, we are lowering the bar to a level that none of us care for.