General Tullius or Ulfric Stormcloak, who do you like more?

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:53 pm

I like tulius because he changes in the end,
Spoiler
idk if this is rly a spoiler but he gains respect for nords
and ulfric only wants the throne and found a chance to get the throne so he took it and now is killing ppl and lieing to himself.
User avatar
Sarah Evason
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:47 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:31 pm

I prefer tullius ONLY because its on the side of the empire. I just cant stomach the thought of supporting a racist like ulfric. 9 times out of 10 my characters arent even nords, so meh. My favorite characters are khajiit so......we would support the thalmor anyways because of the lunar magic that supposedly was the doing of the thalmor.
User avatar
Kate Schofield
 
Posts: 3556
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:58 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:14 pm

Hiding behind Rikke? He is a general. As far as I know and I know little about army, generals never fight in the front lines but he even did that in the last battle.
I too do not know much about the military, however hiding behind a woman during war to me is a sign of weakness. Rikke showed me General materiel, not Tullius. The ranking should be switched around.
Crossing the border isn't an offence, so you were probably guilty of something. The Stormcloaks were captured at Darkwater Crossing but I don't believe you were there as well. I could be wrong. Even if the PC is innocent, it's just a case of wrong place wrong time. Can't really blame the Empire for it. Anyone could have made that mistake.

If we were guilty of something then shouldn't our names be on their execution list? Instead of putting our heads on the block for a good chopping shouldn't they taken us to the prisons to investigate? The captain had no remorse over executing an innocent person therefor to me the imperials are nothing but savages. It only makes Ulfric's theory even more believable of what he says about the empire.

General Tullius again showed me just how much of a [censored] he is by allowing someone who isn't even on the list to be executed. You can't help but to side with Ulfric no matter how power hungry he is.
User avatar
Kitana Lucas
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:59 am

I prefer tullius ONLY because its on the side of the empire. I just cant stomach the thought of supporting a racist like ulfric. 9 times out of 10 my characters arent even nords, so meh. My favorite characters are khajiit so......we would support the thalmor anyways because of the lunar magic that supposedly was the doing of the thalmor.

You just contradicted yourself. You go off playing a Khajiit Thalmor supporter yet the Thalmors are more guilty of being racist then Ulfric. They views themselves as superior to man that eventually want to turn man into thralls slaves yet you dislike Ulfric because hes supposedly a racist to which he is not.
User avatar
luis dejesus
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:40 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:33 pm

Edited because thats was uncalled for and sorry, can only smack forehead so many times before it hurts.

once and for all can someone please show me where ulfric is a. A racist and b. In it for just the sake of power. U know not having power so he can change things but just in it for the power.

Please pretty please show me.
User avatar
Arrogant SId
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:39 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:40 pm

Edited because thats was uncalled for and sorry, can only smack forehead so many times before it hurts.

once and for all can someone please show me where ulfric is a. A racist and b. In it for just the sake of power. U know not having power so he can change things but just in it for the power.

Please pretty please show me.

That's what I want to know. Where do people get the notion that Ulfric is a racist? Because hes not giving away free homes to the Argonians and Dunmers? After so many charterers that I played on Skyrim not once did Ulfric mention anything derogatory about the other race.

Oh and how we focus so much about the lizard people and the dark elves... yet nobody wants to speak out for the cat people (Khajiit) which are prohibit from entering in ALL major cities in skyrim. If Ulfric is racist then so is everybody else in skyrim. It's safe to say that racism is quite normal.
User avatar
Jeff Tingler
 
Posts: 3609
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:55 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:31 pm

Ulfric is just too barbaric for me. What is this war about? Is Ulfric using religion (Talos Worship) as another reason to rile up the Stormcloaks? Tradition is never worth warring over. War is never the correct answer.
User avatar
Heather Kush
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:05 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:00 pm

After dealing with him, I came to the conclusion that I would have made a better High King of Skyrim. Clearly the man is an ego maniac, and power hungry to boot. Unfortunately, I don't have the option to become King, since all the Jarls thought very highly of me, but were hidebound to follow the Imperials to the grave, so aren't going to offer their support. Maybe I could coerce them?

Ulfric is just too barbaric for me. What is this war about? Is Ulfric using religion (Talos Worship) as another reason to rile up the Stormcloaks? Tradition is never worth warring over. War is never the correct answer.
Actually, war is a great answer when someone else starts one with you. But it must be a true war, not some stupid rules war. The only rule is to kill the enemy, any way you can. That's how a real war is fought. And since there are civilian people that support the warmongers fighting you, you have to bring the war to them as well, to let them know that assisting the fighters is the same thing as fighting themselves. Maybe they'll lose stomach and reign them in. But they will learn what a war is really all about. Holding yourself back when fighting is only going to assist in your own defeat.
User avatar
Adriana Lenzo
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:32 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:41 pm

Ulfric is just too barbaric for me. What is this war about? Is Ulfric using religion (Talos Worship) as another reason to rile up the Stormcloaks? Tradition is never worth warring over. War is never the correct answer.

How is Ulfric barbaric when the thalmor is walking around Skyrim killing people that they encounter with and openly admits of worshiping talos? The empire isn't doing jack crap about the problem.
User avatar
Dan Stevens
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:00 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:57 am

How is Ulfric barbaric when the thalmor is walking around Skyrim killing people that they encounter with and openly admits of worshiping talos? The empire isn't doing jack crap about the problem.
I am not defending the empire, I am just showing my dislike of Ulfric. Which choice is best for the future? I don't know. I am on the edge right now. They both have things I like and don't like. I do like though that they didn't make one side an obvious choice.

As for Tullius, he seems just a generic meat head.

Also just a normal question here. Did Ulfric try to negotiate with Torygg? Just asking.
User avatar
Tammie Flint
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:12 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:04 pm

Also just a normal question here. Did Ulfric try to negotiate with Torygg? Just asking.

Nope. Ulfric just walked in and killed Torygg.
User avatar
Solina971
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:40 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:16 pm

Nope. Ulfric just walked in and killed Torygg.
You missed a step or two. Like, challenged him to a duel and Torygg accepted.
User avatar
Latisha Fry
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:20 pm

On my initial playthrough, when I didn't even know I could join the imperial legion, I sided with Ulfric and the stormcloaks right away. He seemed like an honorable and just leader who should be claimed high king. But as I continued through the game I got more and more "conflicting" information about his character. First it was just a whisper, people claiming he was just in it for himself, which was easily brushed off, then his more racist tendencies came into light, and this from people who supported his leadership. Yes, he is respectful towards the Dragonborn if s/he joins his cause, but this would seem mere oppurtunism, or more selective racism. As I didn't discover Markarth before late into the game I didn't hear anything about his threatment of the Forsworn, other than Tullius' note about a certain massacre, which I at the time had no clear information about. However, he was finally revealed to be one hell of a hypocrite, screaming at the empire for outlawing worship of Talos, yet upholding the ban of the Forsworn's old gods, occupying their land and massacring everyone who revolts.

Furthermore if you don't take sides he will continuigly threaten to throw you in jail for taking up his time, which I discovered on a later playthrough. A very interesting character mind you, much more interesting than Tullius, but not really a good guy.

Tullius on the other hand seems to be a honorable man. Rather bland, and really just a bureaucrat, who you don't even get to spend that much time with. He's just another part of the empirical machine, and acts only as your superior officer, threats you fairly, but with cold detachment. Ulfric on the other hand will consider you a friend and continue you bestow rather pointless, but more or less honorable nicknames upon you and will include you in his final speech, but that really doesn't excuse his actions.
User avatar
JD FROM HELL
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:54 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:06 pm

You missed a step or two. Like, challenged him to a duel and Torygg accepted.
It was really somehwhere between total surprise attack and Torygg knowing full well what Ulfric came to do. He asked for an audience with Torygg without revealing his intentions and then challenged him in front of his whole court.
User avatar
Allison C
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:02 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:07 pm

It was really somehwhere between total surprise attack and Torygg knowing full well what Ulfric came to do. He asked for an audience with Torygg without revealing his intentions and then challenged him in front of his whole court.

How else are you supposed to gain an audience with the High King?

Moots can only be convened upon the high king's death, so the issue can't really be skirted around there again. Torygg already knew Ulfric's intentions for years and never once even hinted to him that he agreed. If Ulfric had directly brought up the point of secession and Torygg was against it, Ulfric would've been executed on the spot for treason.
User avatar
Greg Cavaliere
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:49 am

As I didn't discover Markarth before late into the game I didn't hear anything about his threatment of the Forsworn, other than Tullius' note about a certain massacre, which I at the time had no clear information about. However, he was finally revealed to be one hell of a hypocrite, screaming at the empire for outlawing worship of Talos, yet upholding the ban of the Forsworn's old gods, occupying their land and massacring everyone who revolts.
I'll never understand this. Besides the fact that Ulfric is being conveniently scapegoated for the Markarth Incident
Spoiler
in the exact same manner as the Dragonborn is scapegoated later on in the quest
isn't it obvious that- no matter what happened back then- imperial Nords are just as anti-Forsworn and are the ones enforcing Nord supremacy over them? No one ever talks to Jarl Igmund, I take it.

Furthermore if you don't take sides he will continuigly threaten to throw you in jail for taking up his time, which I discovered on a later playthrough.

:blink: He says he's a busy man, you take that to mean he'll throw you in prison? What am I missing?
User avatar
Robyn Howlett
 
Posts: 3332
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:01 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:45 am

I'll never understand this. Besides the fact that Ulfric is being conveniently scapegoated for the Markarth Incident
Spoiler
in the exact same manner as the Dragonborn is scapegoated later on in the quest
isn't it obvious that- no matter what happened back then- imperial Nords are just as anti-Forsworn and are the ones enforcing Nord supremacy over them? No one ever talks to Jarl Igmund, I take it.
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to call the Nords in Markarth loyal Imperial subjects. Thonar himself had
Spoiler
an Imperial spy assassinated by his Forsworn hatchet-men
. Really, Igmund and the greedy Silver-Bloods get all the blame for the Markarth incident, unless you have a problem with Ulfric being involved with it period.
:blink: He says he's a busy man, you take that to mean he'll throw you in prison? What am I missing?
Thank you.
User avatar
Emerald Dreams
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:52 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:38 pm

To hell with both, I will rule the empire as the emperor with both ulfric manchild and tullius dead on a pike infront of my throne. But seeing that I have to pick one cause bethesda wont give me that choice I will go with tullius mainly cause I hate ulfric with a passion.
User avatar
Pat RiMsey
 
Posts: 3306
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:22 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:25 pm

Well, I wouldn't go so far as to call the Nords in Markarth loyal Imperial subjects. Thonar himself had
Spoiler
an Imperial spy assassinated by his Forsworn hatchet-men
. Really, Igmund and the greedy Silver-Bloods get all the blame for the Markarth incident, unless you have a problem with Ulfric being involved with it period.
I don't, since I take The Bear of Markarth with a heavy dose of salt, and have a fond spot in my heart for miserable bastards who get the job done (see avatar). The thing is, when you side with the empire in Skyrim, you're siding with imperial Nords, but people attribute all sorts of things to Stormcloaks that are equally true of the imperial Nords. Xenophobia being one, putting Forsworn out of their misery another. I'm confused by this.
User avatar
Siobhan Thompson
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:40 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:33 pm

I don't, since I take The Bear of Markarth with a heavy dose of salt, and have a fond spot in my heart for miserable bastards who get the job done (see avatar). The thing is, when you side with the empire in Skyrim, you're siding with imperial Nords, but people attribute all sorts of things to Stormcloaks that are equally true of the imperial Nords. Xenophobia being one, putting Forsworn out of their misery another. I'm confused by this.
Nords will be Nords. One may be ruled by an entirely different entity, but they both have the same ideas about Skyrim, just different ways of going about them.

I haven't seen much differentiation between 'Imperial Nords' and 'true Nords' save that one is loyal to the Empire and the other to Ulfric, as well as their respective ideals.
User avatar
Miranda Taylor
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:39 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:57 am

I too do not know much about the military, however hiding behind a woman during war to me is a sign of weakness.
Then stop seeing her as a woman. Seriously, she's in the military, it's an organization which focuses heavily on hierarchy, it just so happens that the one under Tullius is a woman. She's SUPPOSED to be protecting Tullius. Boo-hoo.
User avatar
Kelly Osbourne Kelly
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 6:56 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:24 pm

Ulfric Stormcloak

Why:

For starters he didn't stand back and almost have me executed, that is kind of big in my book.

I like the other answers provided by others but let me offer my own in addition so as not to recap what has already been said.
Tullius knows the the war is what the Thalmor want, he knows that the empire is nothing more than a shell used by the Thalmor and yet he fights to preserve it and works with a group of people that genocided their own people as they took power. Not only that but the Thalmor will genocide more and Tullius even says the civil war was what they wanted right before he dies. Never once did he stop and think about the ramifications of his actions or showed himself to be noble in nature. Even when we want to get an innocent man out of a Thalmor prison he says he, the general in charge of Skyrim, can't do it because it would case a diplomatic situation. How pathetic is that?

Sure Ulfric has his downsides but honestly if they didn't put those in then no one would side with the empire during the civil war. Plus I can't recall anything Ulfric does toward minorities in game that isn't hinted at by other characters. Sure I'm not Xenophobe but when you consider that if Ulfric truly doesn't like other races besides the Nords letting the Dark Elves stay in his city becomes all the nobler.

Plus Ulfric is nice to the Dragonborn and shows him the level of respect he deserves even if he is strongly hinting that it is for political reasons.

For those reasons I side with Ulfric over Tullius any day.
User avatar
Mashystar
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:55 pm

Neither Jarl Balgruuf is the best Yarl and leader in Skyrim.
User avatar
Rhysa Hughes
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:00 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:40 am

Tullius is a military man stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea. He's there to do his job, and he treats you based on your merit rather than DRAGONBORN HURR. I find him much more palatable than Ulfric.
User avatar
Carolyne Bolt
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:56 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:55 pm

Tullius wears a skirt so .....(lol)

Actually i can't decide w/c of them i like more., although i can't seem to get over how Tullius wanted to chop my head off :S
User avatar
Loane
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:35 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim