How is Mr. House evil? (Spoilers)

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:49 pm

Wow Poison_Berrie sumed it up well so I'll only say this.

House is a dicator period, no matter how benevolent you try to make him out to be that is what he is a despot. At the end of the day as a citizen of House, you have no civil rights and no way to change things. As part of the NCR you can: Vote, speak out, publish anti-NCR material, protest, assemble, petition and GAH even vote. At the end of this you're one of those people who'd give up all of there civil rights to a dicator/king if he told you he could take you to utopia. IF House is an absolute ruler then power corrupts absolutely.

Bob :dmc:
User avatar
jesse villaneda
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:37 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:36 am

Wow Poison_Berrie sumed it up well so I'll only say this.

House is a dicator period, no matter how benevolent you try to make him out to be that is what he is a despot. At the end of the day as a citizen of House, you have no civil rights and no way to change things. As part of the NCR you can: Vote, speak out, publish anti-NCR material, protest, assemble, petition and GAH even vote. At the end of this you're one of those people who'd give up all of there civil rights to a dicator/king if he told you he could take you to utopia. IF House is an absolute ruler then power corrupts absolutely.

Bob :dmc:

Nice job making a straw man argument there.

A dictator isn't a bad thing, look at what The Strip has become. Apart from Benny who is greedy, The Omertas who want power, and Mortimer who supported cannibalism, the families are completely happy with House. He's brought lights, he even leaves the kings alone if you help them do to do the right thing and kick NCR out, he leaves them be, seeing their fighting as a sign of their loyalty to New Vegas. You're coming up with that generic "IF IT ISN"T DEMOCRACY IT'S WRONG" crap. Tell me something, if the NCR is so democratic, why do they FORCE you to become NCR territory? Why do they commit racism against Super Mutants? That doesnt sound like civil rights to me. Ghouls are also looked upon poorly as well. So much for civil rights and equality huh? Ever seen a Super Mutant trooper? You're right, you havent, they drove them our of NCR because they are bigots.
User avatar
JD FROM HELL
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:54 am

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:31 pm

I'll agree that they've been shown to not being willing to share. But truth be told, it always seemed to me that House was keeping the NCR there only because he didn't have the capabilities to keep them away and they were convenient against the Legion. Without the chip and the non-functional reactor his hold was limited and if the NCR was playing nice and allowed him to keep the Strip he would have driven them because they don't factor in his plans for the area except as a source of money.

Which he actively states. He knows he can't beat them off, he knows that if they attack they'd lose a lot of men but take the strip, he knows they would do so if it wasn't for the Legion.

How wonderful a government, stealing that which is not theirs simply because it exists. One wonders how anyone could not side with the NCR. If the Legion was not present they would have attacked the Strip, that's plain as day, they make it plain as day, they know it, House knows it. They wouldn't have held back or played nice, they would have marched in and killed anyone who tried to stop them, the three families (no major loss) the securitrons (huge loss) and anyone else who stood in their way (Kings).


Really? Because contrary to what you might think both the NCR and Legion made quite some head way in rebuilding, long before House did.
Disregarding their methods and views, Caesar has brought order to a violent and chaotic region.
The NCR were (seemingly) the first to create a working economic and military nation. Their citizens enjoy quite a few rights and it's a reasonably tolerant society (open to ghouls and mutants).

If it really is true that House is the only one who can bring back civilization, I'd say leave humanity to rot. If their only salvation is a cybernetic computer, than I don't really think humanity deserve it's chance.
It would be truly sad that without this single person and his promise of space travel humanity is completely worthless and doomed.

Eh? House stopped the annihilation and, for want of less than a day, almost completely stopped any destruction of Vegas. That's a good start, he then, after battling innumerate system failures as a result of the lack of a chip (backup systems stretched extremely thinly in order to protect were damaged) he re appears, unites three warring families and sets up a business at the drop of a hat. He then goes on to make the most populace area and the only one with any source of steady income.

The NCR have...shot people and stolen stuff. Okay overly simplistic, they've set up their organisation then proceeded to expand like a bubble, absorbing everything into itself and changing nothing except the taxes. Anything which refuses to yield is subjugated by force. They're glorified raiders, cutting a bloody path through the world in the name of freedom, not like that's ever happened in world history. They share more in common with the Legion than anyone cares to admit.
Many of them are good people, certainly are, but their leaders are not, nor are the people with real pull. As with any voted electorate the people at the top know eachother, they all play the game and their world runs on pull: who you know. If we take House to be Ayn Rand's wet dream then the NCR are her worst nightmare. That won't change, of course it won't, the people at the top decides who goes to the top.
The Legion, well we hear they've rebuilt stuff...from...the Legion, which is about as reliable as judging the size of a male's genitalia by what he says online. We don't know what's going on in their lands, we can guess and from the harsh rules and abusive treatment of women it's likely to be safe from outside attack and raiders, but not from the ruling party. Again, like many real world agencies.


He's a man, not a computer. Moreover what is the problem with one person saving humanity? Seriously, do all saviours have to come in groups of 4 or more or they get turned away? Humanity will persevere without House, of course it would, we're like cockroaches, only more stubborn. However with House we would prosper. He offers development, he has knowledge which simply cannot be acquired by any other means, much of his technology is useless, as the FotA note with his life prolonging tech but some of it is extraordinary and he's sharing it and using it on a daily basis. Without House humanities advance would stagnate for so very long. With him we would move at a rapid pace, assuming the Legion and NCR don't suddenly decide they really want to take Vegas again.


It's easy to tally only the bad sides of the opposing sides and the good sides of the one you support. It paints him in quite a good daylight, let's just forget about the land grabbing he is shown to do, the murders mass murder he commits and the fact that he is shown to care solely for his plan and not for actual people.
People seem to forget that House is just as much and sometimes even more about using the tools that they vilify the NCR and Legion for.

What land grabbing? He owns the Strip, he not only saved it but rebuilt it and protected it, that's not land grabbing, that's land forging. House is a man who emerges from a cave and builds a fortress in the rock, inviting those with something to offer inside and telling those without something to offer to find a skill or resource, a sensible approach given the times. The NCR are like a tribe who see this fortress and want to claim it for their own, simply because it exists and is not theirs.
He doesn't commit mass murder either, the closest we get is the BoS, a pre emptive strike in an ongoing war. I don't like granting it so easily but in this case it was a very sound decision, the BoS are an incredible threat as I've stated before. He doesn't kill anyone else without provocation.

As for only caring for his plan, partly true. He only cares for things which progress his ideals, luckily for humanity his ideals are highly useful. What do you think would happen if House opened his arms wide and invited the world into Vegas? It'd be left destitute and rotten. A million caps for one man is huge, distribute it amongst thousands and it becomes meagre. The same with Vegas, allowing only those of value in is upsetting but if you don't then everyone dies.
Now don't get me wrong, there's room for manoeuvre, House's stance is in my opinion too harsh, particularly when there are groups readily available to help others. If I were in a position to do so I'd divert some resources to the FotA. But not huge amounts, money is needed, lots of it.


Actually they make it clear that they lack resources for more people and their first priority is their own citizens. And what's worse is that House is completely apathetic to plights of Freeside.
You're not using the word despot right. You might say that the NCR is only looking out for it's citizens and doesn't care for non-citizens, but that doesn't equate to them being despotic.

No different to House, he just doesn't sugar coat it, what is it with you people? Have you been fed so much bull by politicians that unless someone grovels for forgiveness you think them demons? See above for why House can't just save the world so easily. One minute you think he's incapable of helping, the next you expect him to click his fingers and fix everything (actually, who knows, maybe if he could it would, clicking those fingers would probably break something though)


That's argument is based on a fallacy. A democratic power was in charge when the war happened, thus democracy is automatically a faulty system? There's three faulty assumptions in that.
1) The assumption that the sole responsibility of the war lies with the US government. This disregards the circumstances leading up to the war, the other involved party (communist China) and the shadow government (Enclave).
2) The assumption that all democracies are the same. Though there are certain qualifiers for a democracy there is not a single way to do it and pre-war America is shown to be a paranoid, controlling and deflecting society.
3) The assumption that it is the system of democracy that breeds the corruption. Do you truly think the powerful and wealthy people who seek to corrupt would not exist or be seeking to expand or keep their power if the NCR or a democracy didn't exist.

And really I only see Mr. House doing something about corruption when it conflicts with his own interest.

Of course they will always exist, democracy makes it easier. Look, for what we have now in this world it's a working system, just. Full of flaws and terribly corrupt but it works, it's the lesser of our evils. In the wasteland it's not quite the same. House is a dictator, yes, he fits it to a tee, he is however a benevolent dictator (as in Plato's ideal), not a despot.

What does House not do to combat corruption that he can? The three families are left to run their casinos because House cannot intervene, without them Vegas would fall (he acknowledges that securitrons alone would not give the NCR pause for thought, the three families are needed), part of their arrangement is that he cannot send securitrons into the casino's without serious due. Breaking that risks breaking up the three families or civil war, neither of which he can risk with the Legion across the water and worse, the NCR breathing down his neck. Other than that, there is no corruption, he elects no one, nepotism exists only within the families and casinos and that's that. It's autonomous which denies corruption.


Well he had a robot tailing you from the start. Did he ever state he knew Benny was betraying him before he saw him shoot you?

...is he psychic now? How would he know Benny was going to betray him until he did so? What, you expect him to read minds? The guy can't access Benny's casino. The FotA girl was an imbecile (seriously, "derp I dunno, it sounded fine, derp") and House can't be expected to do a full check on every individual who enters the strip to ascertain if they may possibly be able to help a fool with delusions of grandeur start a mutiny.

I seriously don't understand your point here, how do you expect House to know about Benny's betrayal before it happens?
User avatar
Scared humanity
 
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:41 am

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 2:31 pm

I don't get why some people see killing off the BoS is such a big deal. They are not the same BoS you saw in D.C. This BoS is purely a military organization who do the best they can to maintain humanity's dark age.
User avatar
jessica Villacis
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:03 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:57 am

I'm pretty shocked to see that this thread is still raging.

Another benevolent dictator argument?

Faurbatison is the only person to provide a single historical example of an actual benevolent dictator - the Prime Minister of Singapore - although he really isn't a 'dictator' in the sense that he can't have people dispatched on his whim like House. Otherwise, all I can think of are the King of Bhutan and maybe the Roman dictator Cincinnatus - both of whom ruled rather small nations and Cincinnatus was only dictator for a few years, before he abdicated power.

So. . .is House evil?

In the "does he beat babies to death with bags of kittens" sense, no he's not evil. Even the legion isn't evil in that sense. Although they own slaves, so did George Washington, John Madison, and Thomas Jefferson, yet very few people would argue that they're evil.

Is House evil in the sense that he's an absolute dictator? Being a dictator doesn't inherently make one evil - it depends how he uses his power. You can compare House's rule to that of the legion or the NCR but that's irrelevant. That doesn't determine his morality. Was Genghis Khan the "better" man b/c the Emperor of China was hopelessly corrupt? No. I think not. Genghis Khan annihilated entire nations without a thought, even though he wasn't materially corruptible.

I maintain that "evil" is to be judged on a personal level. Who is House as a person? He's a narcissistic ego-maniac who believes he is the last hope for human kind. Might his rule benefit some of the Mojave's residents? Yes. Might Stalin have benefitted Russia in the long run? Yes. Does that make Stalin good? No, not IMO.

House has only dabbled in slaughter thus far, forcing people out the strip, filling in the vault, and ordering the annihilation of the BoS, (and possibly the Kings) but I see all of these actions not as "for the good of the Mojave" but as keeping himself secure in his power. What is NV, really? Its a collection of gambling houses and venues for prostitution. Is that a triumph of capitalism and progress as so many of you people make it out to be? I don't think so - I live near Atlantic City and that is no pinnacle of success. Is he feeding people? Is he keeping people safe (excluding the few dozen people on the strip who are also guarded by the NCR anyway) from raiders and slavers? Has he set up any social services or tried to help the Followers? No.

House is all about his 'vision' - he's obsessed with it. He cannot relate with others, uses people as pawns, and kills them if they get in his way. Is that evil - not if you excuse evil acts b/c they're done for what's seen as ''the greater good' - but is it moral? I don't think so. Evil is a tad strong, but I don't think House is a very good person, and I'm surprised that so many rise to defend his 'ethics.' He could have done much better things with his resources but he's blinded by his ego.

I think most people admire House because of his Machiavellian nature, but being a reincarnation of Machiavelli doesn't make him "good" or guarantee his success.

Look at what happened to Machiavelli and Florence in the end. Not to degrade the city of Florence, but it didn't stay a great power for very long and neither would a House-led Mojave.
User avatar
Matt Gammond
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:05 pm

WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS

As an Independent Vegas supporter I'm just gonna throw in my 2 cents. Mr. House is my second choice, the NCR being the thrid and the Legion at number 4.

Mr. House
Spoiler

Mr. House isn't evil, but he isn't a saint either. His mass murders were unreasonable and unforgivable, and I don't like how he wants you to handle the BoS either. That bunker is full of people who can be reasoned with, and I think Mr. House could simply destroy the BoS in a diplomatic way (the members would all leave the faction, and settle in the Mojave). Instead, he kills all men and women in there.
I think he has his own ideas about an ideal New Vegas, with all the casinos and other buildings. If he doesn't want greasers to be walking around there, he pushes them out of the Strip and clearly isn't afraid to use violence. It's almost neurotic, and I wouldn't want a neurotic person to rule over New Vegas.
The good thing about Mr. House is that he only does things to protect himself and the Strip, and doesn't waste his energy on trying to expand. Also he is highly intelligent, unlike e.g. the NCR. He cares about the people (if you tell him you're killing him in the name of Caesar he gets mad) This however doesn't justify his mass murders.

NCR
Spoiler
The NCR is a complicated bunch, but I'm still morally opposed to them, for several reasons. One of them is that they are led by three warhawks: Kimball, Oliver and Moore. As Easy Pete says, there's a lot of good folk in the NCR (Hsu, Hanlon, Crocker) but they aren't the ones who have the power. In FNV, you see how many problems the NCR has, and I don't think that a faction that has so many problems should rule over New Vegas (especially because thye can't even handle the Fiends). Also, they're a bunch of backstabbers, because they want you to assassinate Mr. House, even though they signed a treaty. That's just low.
The thing I hate most about the NCR is something is how little they care about their own troopers: People who are willing to die for the NCR. When they enlist to join the army, they are aware of the risk that they could die. The NCR doesn't even try protecting its own soldiers! If you talk to a girl at 188 Trading Post she'll tell you that some troopers are sent to fight the Legion after only two weeks of training and no armor! Also Major Knight tells you that the NCR doesn't approve of (male) homosixuality, which doesn't make the NCR any better then the sixist Legion.
The NCR is also just plain stupid. They give a bunch of convicts some explosives to work with. Come on.
Besides clearly not being qualified to take over the Mojave, the NCR is also led by a couple of douchebags.

The Legion
Spoiler

*Slavery, crucifixion, sixism, blah blah blah
*They use kids in warfare (talk to Ranger Andy in Novac), taking the childhood of someone away is one of the lowest crimes ever.
*They rap3 (this was censored <_<) people (Ask Veronica about the Legion)
*They are hypocrites. They are proud of the safe roads in Arizona, but still they raid traveling merchants in the Mojave.
*Their ''alliance'' with the Khans is also low.
*They are mass murderers, complete How Little We Know and pass a speech check of 80 with Cachino
*They approve of The White Glove Society's canniballism
*The second in command of the Legion is a psychopath (Lanius = Butcher in Latin)
*Nipton, some say that it was a good action of the Legion, because the town was filled with Powder Gangers and prosttutes. I don't give a damn about the Powder Gangers, but I honestly don't see how murdering prosttutes because they're prosttutes is justified. It's the f-ing Wasteland, people have to survive.

User avatar
Invasion's
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:09 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 2:36 pm

Most of those raiders are secretly being backed by the Legion to destabilize NCR held areas so that the people have no faith in thier ability to protect them and refuse to help them rather than be killed by the Legion.

Where does it say that?
User avatar
Killah Bee
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:23 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:10 am

WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS

[/spoiler]
The Legion
Spoiler

*Slavery, crucifixion, sixism, blah blah blah
*They use kids in warfare (talk to Ranger Andy in Novac), taking the childhood of someone away is one of the lowest crimes ever.
*They rap3 (this was censored <_<) people (Ask Veronica about the Legion)
*They are hypocrites. They are proud of the safe roads in Arizona, but still they raid traveling merchants in the Mojave.
*Their ''alliance'' with the Khans is also low.
*They are mass murderers, complete How Little We Know and pass a speech check of 80 with Cachino
*They approve of The White Glove Society's canniballism
*The second in command of the Legion is a psychopath (Lanius = Butcher in Latin)
*Nipton, some say that it was a good action of the Legion, because the town was filled with Powder Gangers and prosttutes. I don't give a damn about the Powder Gangers, but I honestly don't see how murdering prosttutes because they're prosttutes is justified. It's the f-ing Wasteland, people have to survive.


I'll just put my whole reply in a spoiler :sadvaultboy:
Spoiler

*The crucifixion is an awesome wartime scare tactic
*Nothing wrong with using kids, it's the end of the world, nobody has a real childhood, just look at little lamplight! At least these kids have some use.
*I lol'd rap3 i read it rap-3 and was confused for so long!
*who doesn't raid the traveling merchants? Even the Crimson Caravan, workers of the NCR, do it. NCR winds up allying with the Van Graffts after "Birds of a Feather" and all they did was wipe out caravans
*The Khans thing gets under my skin too
*ofc they're mass murderers, they're trying to purge!
*I never understood how they could approve of cannibalism but not of drug usage...
*He's an effective wartime leader, may not be the guy to put in Caesar's shoes once Caesar dies, but after the Burned Man incident he was probably the best option.
*Who said they were prosttutes? They were disloyal to one another. Go through the dialogue with Vulpes again. Even as beloved family and friends were sent to their death each was holding out, hoping to have the winning ticket instead of actually running to their defense. They were cowards. In a society as extreme as what the Legion has set up Cowardice is punished in such a manner anyways.

User avatar
Ross
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:22 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:42 am

I'll just put my whole reply in a spoiler :sadvaultboy:
Spoiler

*The crucifixion is an awesome wartime scare tactic - agree
*Nothing wrong with using kids, it's the end of the world, nobody has a real childhood, just look at little lamplight! At least these kids have some use. - Jesus Christ you are sick.
*I lol'd rap3 i read it rap-3 and was confused for so long! - ...
*who doesn't raid the traveling merchants? Even the Crimson Caravan, workers of the NCR, do it. NCR winds up allying with the Van Graffts after "Birds of a Feather" and all they did was wipe out caravans - So the Legion is good because the NCR does the same? I never said I was an NCR supporter
*The Khans thing gets under my skin too - 'k
*ofc they're mass murderers, they're trying to purge! - Yeah, I love the Legion now you said that
*I never understood how they could approve of cannibalism but not of drug usage... - 'k
*He's an effective wartime leader, may not be the guy to put in Caesar's shoes once Caesar dies, but after the Burned Man incident he was probably the best option. - In one of the endings he kills the FotA, does that sound like a best option to you?
*Who said they were prosttutes? They were disloyal to one another. Go through the dialogue with Vulpes again. Even as beloved family and friends were sent to their death each was holding out, hoping to have the winning ticket instead of actually running to their defense. They were cowards. In a society as extreme as what the Legion has set up Cowardice is punished in such a manner anyways. - ''I was a town of wh0res (damn censoring <_<)'' -Vulpes Inculta. There is plenty of proof that Nipton was full of prosttutes, you should read the files on some of the terminals in Nipton. And it was a justified action because Nipton was full of cowardice? Why don't you go to a town with some friends and do this?!


User avatar
Imy Davies
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:42 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 3:13 am

I hate the Followers of the Apocalypse, they're awful awful people deep down. Do the White Wash mission, you'll get what I'm saying.
And I'll again refute the last point. He calls them [censored]s because they have NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANYBODY BUT THE MIGHT CAP (lol silly currency), it's not that they're actual prosttutes, I did read the terminals. The mayor [censored]s out his town and is punished in the end. Their main crime is disloyalty. :shakehead:
User avatar
Ann Church
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:41 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 3:41 am

I hate the Followers of the Apocalypse, they're awful awful people deep down. Do the White Wash mission, you'll get what I'm saying.
And I'll again refute the last point. He calls them [censored]s because they have NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANYBODY BUT THE MIGHT CAP (lol silly currency), it's not that they're actual prosttutes, I did read the terminals. The mayor [censored]s out his town and is punished in the end. Their main crime is disloyalty. :shakehead:


Yeah, the FotA are awful people, they killed one person!
And saved like only... a lot of lives! Come on, I′m sure you can come with better arguments.
User avatar
Luna Lovegood
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:45 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:45 pm

Yeah, the FotA are awful people, they killed one person!
And saved like only... a lot of lives! Come on, I′m sure you can come with better arguments.

If killing one person makes them aweful, the courier must be something Satan himself would call vile and evil. :spotted owl:
User avatar
(G-yen)
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:10 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:06 pm

If killing one person makes them aweful, the courier must be something Satan himself would call vile and evil. :spotted owl:

that's so relevant
User avatar
Emily abigail Villarreal
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:38 am

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:59 pm

I wanted to finish the game with neutral karma sided with Mr.House but stupid karma system didn't allow me to. I kept gaining karma for killing legion soldiers at dam and ended up good.
It's just stupid how could you earn karma by killing someone unless he/she is a tyrant that has been terrorizing people for ages or something like that?
User avatar
Cash n Class
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:01 am

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:04 pm

WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS

As an Independent Vegas supporter I'm just gonna throw in my 2 cents. Mr. House is my second choice, the NCR being the thrid and the Legion at number 4.


good man :D
I share alomst everything you have to say about these 3 factions, my order would be the same as yours, saves me quite a bit of writing work. So, just some additions from my side:

House:

He's not evil, but absolutely selfish, which of course implies pretty bad and ugly consequences at times.
His sayings about the star traveling are truthful reflections of this mans personal dreams and ambitions.
He doesn't do it out of a philantropic motivation, though. He just wants to accomplish what none has ever accomplished before.
He has, however no qualms to push aside whoever and whatever gets in his way, and he's also totally honest about that.
His personal conviction, that he's supposedly better than anybody else, and with that included, his constant inner need to prove that again and again and again, is what drives this man.
To me, a very interesting, yet not likeable person. Can't help but feeling a deep respect for his achievements, though.

NCR:

Agree with all you've said.
Simply put, the NCR is suffering under what historians call an "imperial overstretch".
They just lack the ressources to support such a vast territory, With that comes instability, with instability threatening a state/realm/country hawkish views(and the people carrying them) gain influence, usually just fuelling the fire of downfall further on.
This is exactly what just happens with the NCR.
It also explains, why they are betraying their own values, not holding up to their words and agreements anymore, and backstabbing everyone, whenever they feel it helps them along.

Legion.

Nothing to be said in addition.
A bunch of misogynistic psychopaths suggesting they are supossed to have the right to decide about one's life, while in truth they are the biggest thinkable scum themselves.
User avatar
Horse gal smithe
 
Posts: 3302
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:23 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 2:41 pm

ARGH!! Why most you torture me so!

I had written several replies on two occasions and each time the forum kicks me in the gut.
I'll just condense it all in to this than. LET'S SEE YOU STOP ME NOW UNIVERSE :swear:

I had a full write up with reasons and arguments but it came down to that all sides have certain detractors and advantages and I can't honestly say that none of them come out on top as the only logical choice, despite what some might say.

Also House is not the only hope for humanity and it would be a slap in the face of past and future Fallout games if he truly is the savior he and some of his fans make him out to be.
User avatar
krystal sowten
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:25 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:08 pm

For people who say house is still a person, i dont think so. He is a 200 year old person, who is surrounded by machines 24/7, and whos only contact with people is through heavily armed securitrons, and he is only driven by a dream. I think he lost his humanity years ago. And i think the one who leads humanity should actually be human.

Also defending the legion. Raul, who is not the member of the legion, says that the tamed arizona and that it used to be a hell hole.
The legion dosnt kill and raid traders, it actually lets them go into its lands [do the 30 speech skill when trying to get to cottonwood cove]
Ceaser calls lanius savage, he is only there because he is good at what he does.
Using kids is pretty ruthless and i dont agree with it, but the Mojave isnt a nice place. If you want to tame it, you gotta do some bad things to intimidate and make the enemy fear you.
No mention of Ceaser approving of canabalism, he justs wants the white glove soceity to work for them
I didnt approve of the whole ra3p thing, but i guess its just another tactic to make the rest of the Mojave fear them.
User avatar
Naughty not Nice
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:14 am

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:24 pm

Where does it say that?


Spoiler
The Fiends attacked Camp McCarran during the second Battle of Hoover Dam and suffered heavy losses. Caesar, unimpressed with their performance and their dependence on chems, had them exterminated.


It's not spelled out, but the above ending slide, taken in context with Fiend behavior, makes it clear to me they were part of Caesar's plan...if only as a disposable pawn. They seem to be suspiciously well armed for Raiders, not to mention thier main chem suppliers are allied with the Legion. I suspect Caesar/Inculta were using the Khans as a cutout to enlist and manipulate the Fiends as a proxy fighter for the Legion. Inculta is known to make use of the "False Flag" approach to hire agents, it wouldn't be difficult for Karl to "suggest" how the Khans might direct the Fiends to best annoy the NCR.

Basically, the plan is this. While Lanius and the main force...which have been ready to attack for weeks and are just waiting for the green light....keep Oliver fixated on the Dam, the Legion destroys Camp Searchlight and occupies Nelson, while sending raiding parties as far West as Nipton and North as far as Nelson and the outskirts of Novac. Meanwhile, the Fiends terrorize the whole North and west of NV to disrupt NCR supply lines and encourage the locals to despise the NCR as ineffectual...while waiting for the cue to stage a all-out assault on McCarran...and the Khans keep the Fiends supplied with chems and use thier infuence to keep them from being distracted from the task at hand (Motor-Runner tells you he is trying to keep his people out of Westside to appease the Khans) while biding thier time for the attack on the Dam. Inside McCarran, Capt. Curtis keeps the Legion advised on all NCR activities and prepares to sabotage the monorail...isolating McCarran from the Strip so they cannot aid each other when both are attacked. Inside the Strip, the Omertas wait to perform thier task....wiping out the NCR troops in the Strip, the Chairmen, the remaining Securitrons....and if they do not agree to serve Caesar, the White Gloves as well.

When the attack order is given, all the major NCR concentrations will be attacked simultaneously and ideally destroyed in detail...or at least prevented from reinforcing other parts of the NCR lines. With McCarran, Camp Golf, and Forlorn Hope taken by the Legion, the NCR forces at the Dam itself will be doomed even if they stop Lanius's assault as they will be cut off from reinforcements and will not be able to hold out long when attacked from both sides of the Dam. As far as the remaining NCR troops, not only will they be harassed by the Khans and Fiends, as well as the Legion (the Legion attack on Novac is probably mainly intended to keep it from being used as a rally point by NCR troops fleeing Forlorn Hope and Camp Golf) but they might find another Legion force sent in through Cottonwood Cove through Nipton to cut off thier retreat down I-15 to the Mojave Outpost. While I find the Legion and it's leaders revolting, I like how they use sound strategy and the things that they do...even thier terror tactics...are for rational reasons, not stupid evil ones.
User avatar
Jennifer May
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:51 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:26 am

I've always thought the Fiends got their weaponry from the vault.
User avatar
lolli
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:42 am

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 10:55 am

Actually there's some more dialogue to confirm that.
At least I remember some notes on it and perhaps some comments in Vault 3? Can't be really sure right now, but there's some more evidence to it.

Weapons do come from the Vault, though.
User avatar
Nichola Haynes
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:54 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:10 pm


Using kids is pretty ruthless and i dont agree with it, but the Mojave isnt a nice place. If you want to tame it, you gotta do some bad things to intimidate and make the enemy fear you.


I love ranting about the Legion, but from now on I'm just going to refuse arguing with any one who approves of using kids in war.
User avatar
Destinyscharm
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 6:06 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:47 pm

I dont approve of using kids in war. I can understand why the legion does it though. I think its cruel and unnessesary, but i understand why they do it
User avatar
GPMG
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:55 am

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:27 am

I can understand why the legion does it though. but i understand why they do it


lolwtf
User avatar
Laura Richards
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:42 am

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:08 pm

Just me repeating myself. Making sure i got the point across

No wonder i failed english :sadvaultboy:
User avatar
QuinDINGDONGcey
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:11 pm

Post » Sat Dec 25, 2010 10:50 am

I've always thought the Fiends got their weaponry from the vault.


The only energy weapons you usually find in a Vault are laser pistols....I've taken Plasma weapons and laser rifles of of Fiends I've killed. Also, if you read the terminals in Vault 3 you'll find the last Overseer and one of his allies discussing how the Vault's weapons were to be stored in the lowest level (which ultimately flooded) so the "Isolationist" Vault Residents could not use them to stage a coup to stop them from opening the Vault.
User avatar
Baylea Isaacs
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:58 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas