Stupid Looking Helmets

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:31 pm

It's awfully selfish of you to object to my great idea for having armor but not having to see it. I want the appearance of the Fine Clothes, but I want the armor rating of heavy armor. I find it ridiculous that there's no "my my armor look like Fine Clothes" option AS AN OPTION.

And I don't leave the forums because there are plenty of good ideas floating around. This ain't one of 'em.

There's also a bunch of absurd ideas, and this is a fine example. The forum isn't a place you go to agree with everybody about everything.
User avatar
lauren cleaves
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:35 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 7:27 am

I feel it's unrealistic enough by the game's standards that it doesn't belong in the vanilla game, but I've no problem with people making an invisible helmet mod if it's really that important for them to fight without a helmet with the perks.

And can we please calm down? I don't want anyone getting in trouble for something related to what I said.

I'd rather see a fight and bannings across the board. It's all your fault, man. :D
User avatar
Laura-Jayne Lee
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:35 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:28 am

so when beast races have graphic bugs, you just tell them to not wear a helmet? how about laying the burden on people who are in charge of glitches? i'm sure bethesda will fix stuff like that too, and already put the burden on themselves... that's their job. i don't know why you would think it's acceptable. they probably don't themselves. all game developers fix things like that. not tell customers to just "deal with it". lol. it's cool that you like the game and all. so do i. but that's no excuse to just defend every single aspect of it, as it is, out of the box.

edit: Actually, I'm not sure you're serious. Maybe you're just trying to rile up Precursor. In which case, good job. I guess. I can't think of another reason why you'd take this position.

Actually that is my general position, but yes, in terms of actual graphical glitches for the Khajiit and Argonians, yeah, they should fix that. They have differently-shaped heads and should probably have helmets that only they can use, while not being able to wear more humanoid helmets. Their heads are differently enough shaped, etc. and so forth.

Not sure what they'd do with Argonians that have large horns, though. They might have to make specific helmets for them.

And no, I'm not trying to rile anybody up, but neither do I feel obliged to refrain from pointing out that "I think helmets should be able to be made invisible cuz I done made me a purdy Dark Elf but I wanna wear a helmet" is a ridiculous idea. That's how things work - if you want armor protecting your head, you wear a helmet. If you want people to see your luxurious, flowing hair and vivid, captivating purple eyes that look like two pools of...Graqe Nehi or something, then don't wear a helmet. You can't get the benefits of wearing a helmet and not wearing a helmet at the same time. I think some people get annoyed when any scrap of reality interferes with them playing [i]Dress-Up Fantasy Dolls VII: Skyrim Fashonistas[i/] or something.

This is a forum to discuss things, and discussion includes instances of disagreement.
User avatar
asako
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:16 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:45 pm

Play in first person

*Advice Dovahkin*

Who cares about helmet?


Sorry, just had to throw that out there. I rather like the Imperial Light helmet, Elven Helmet, and Glass Helmets. Scaled Looked like total butt, though, I fully admit.
User avatar
liz barnes
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:10 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:25 am

^ What kind of character do you play?

I don't mind the scaled helmet myself.. but don't like the others you mentioned... at least on Nords. Umm, besides imperial. That looks good.
User avatar
Naomi Ward
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:37 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 7:02 am

I think it`s something you should live with. Would you take off a marine helmet just because you didn`t like the look of it and lose the protection you get from it?

Take it off, you lose the benefits- makes sense to me. Helmets aren`t supposed to be pretty either, they`re meant to protect you or look ugly to scare the enemy.

+1 on this. I'm not crazy about the look but I regard it as a necessary evil.
User avatar
Alister Scott
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:56 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:48 am

An option to open the faceplate of your helmet(for closed helmets) would be cool but I dont see this feature being added anytime soon.

they have mods to open up the Ebon helm already and the CK isn't out yet.
User avatar
phil walsh
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:46 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:22 pm

Thank the Gods for first person mode, the true way to play TES.
User avatar
kitten maciver
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:36 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:27 am



It already has it: It's called "not wearing the helmet". This is rather simple - if you don't like the way something looks on your character, you avoid this by not wearing it. I'm not sure how it can get simpler.

But I agree that hoods should be able to be pulled back. That's how hoods actually work. Helmets are not actually invisible.
You don't get defensive stat bonus by not wearing one. Plus I usually don't, because of how bad they look on my argonian. Don't even get me started about Dragon Priest masks!
User avatar
Hope Greenhaw
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:44 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:28 am

It's just absurd, though. "I don't understand why I can't have my weapon work like a bow, but look like a sword, because the swords look cooler but I want a ranged weapon. Why aren't they doing this?"

It`ll be a sad day when Bethesda decides people can have all the bonus they want for evrything and throw all common sense out of the window just because someone doesn`t have to keep to some kind of limit to do something.

That`s when I`ll finally stop playing Betesda`s game.

No limits and the game will be rubbish, i guarantee it. we define our own existence by our limits- It`s what makes things a challenge and even fun sometimes.

As my sig says a fantasy is more believable when realistic things are kept in. remove everything and you might as well have fish swords that fire laser beams and run around naked because you`re magically armoured to the hilt because you want to see your pretty hair!.
User avatar
Lovingly
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:36 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:38 am

If you want the enchantments THEN WEAR A HELMET. "I think it's ridiculous we can't make our helmets invisible" may well be THE MOST RIDICULOUS COMPLAINT ON A FORUM THAT IS FULL OF RIDICULOUS COMPLAINTS.
Correction if you want the enchantment, wear an circlet.
next week you have armored circlets you can craft.
That annoys me more is that all the hats remove the Khajiit ears, it actually look better if they poke trough.
User avatar
Ricky Rayner
 
Posts: 3339
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:13 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:12 pm

I think the idea in this thread is stupid too. There are alternatives to not wanting a helmet.

If you want the Enchantment bonus, but don't like any helm, wear a Circlet. They generally look good and are unobtrusive
If you want the bonus for Full Suit, find a helmet within your armor class you do like the looks of - There has to be at least one. If not, then you know in advance that you don't want the Matching Armor bonus - Save your perk point (The annoying thing about Light Armor is that you're required to take the Matching Suit perk).

If you don't like the helm that comes with your favored suit of armor, then you know in advance that you don't want the "Custom Fit" armor bonus because you don't like the entirety of any suit - Save yourself a perk point.

If you don't take the Full Armor perks, then you have nothing to lose for not wearing a helm. And if you do take the Full Armor perks, then you are acknowledging you want a full suit of armor - Head, Hand, Feet, and Body. Says so right in the description.
User avatar
Steven Hardman
 
Posts: 3323
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:12 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:44 pm

Even though I don't like the way most helmets look, I wouldn't want them to be invisibly worn. If you can't stand the sight of them that much, take it off and lose 'some' protection. If you want the extra protection, wear it with pride and swallow that ugly pill.

Having your cake and eating it too by making it invisibly present breaks the game a bit. Just an opinion. Not saying that other things in Skyrim are all game immersion realistic, but you have to stop the madness somewhere or else we will start seeing invisible weapons and armor.
User avatar
Ella Loapaga
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:45 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:29 am

I dont have a single issue with the helmets.
User avatar
Oscar Vazquez
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:08 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:31 am

Hiding the helmets but keeping the protection they give? Seems illogical to me. If you don't want a helmet but want the extra enchantment slot, use a circlet. It's probably what they were put in for.
User avatar
Trevor Bostwick
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:51 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:38 am

People don't want tradeoffs. They want to see their purdy hair AND have the protection of a helmet.

And hell, why stop there? I'd like to have the protection of heavy armor AND be able to wear anything I want, including nothing at all. It's so ridiculous that I can't have invisible armor!

And why do I have to wait to a high level before I have enough perks to be good at one-handed weapons AND two-handed weapons AND heavy armor AND destruction magic AND alchemy AND sneaking AND archery AND enchanting AND alteration? Why can I only spend each perk point once? Why can't I just use it as many times as I like? It's so ridiculous that I have to take time to get perk points, and then I only get to use them for ONE perk!

Well said.

When I don't like a helmet, I just don't wear it. Simple. Alternatively, I could look for a mod to tweak the look.
User avatar
Jack
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:08 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:11 pm

Yeah, I'm all for the idea of mods to add to the armor options in the game. That's for sure.
User avatar
Laura Elizabeth
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:34 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:39 pm

I think the real problem is that a lot of helmets in the game look totally stupid.

If they added better looking helmets I'd happily wear them.

Couple of examples:

[img]http://www.theknightshop.co.uk/catalog/images/KIH.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www.swordsandarmor.com/images/H002203_White_Knight_Helmet.JPG[/img]
User avatar
matt oneil
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:54 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:14 pm

This is why each armor should have had at least 3 different templates.
like the fur armor lol?

i was hoping smithing would have been like this where you could have chosen a certain templlate even if it ment going out and finding them for each armor piece/weapon like with the matrixesse (spelling?) from SI

i do have to agree with the op i hate the way helmets look in this game which is why i wear hoods with my armor
User avatar
Natasha Callaghan
 
Posts: 3523
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:44 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:44 am

As much as I still hold to the standpoint that if someone doesn't like the way an element looks in the game, they should download Blender and model their own elements and then mod them into the game, I am forced to ask the question, "Why not allow Helmets to be toggled invisible. This is not like an MMO where everyone sees what other players are wearing (and even MMOs have cosmetic toggle options). This is a single player game that one may play for their own amusemant. Whether they prefer to cheat with console commands, or mod something out, or whatever they prefer to do has absolutely no bearing on anyone's gameplay experience but their own. So why should they be ridiculed for it?

Now I do have to say that any furture cosmetic options that may or may not get added should take an EXTREME back seat to bug fixes and actual gameplay mechanics. But if harmless requests like this can be fulfilled in the process, they should be.
User avatar
Your Mum
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:23 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:02 pm

As much as I still hold to the standpoint that if someone doesn't like the way an element looks in the game, they should download Blender and model their own elements and then mod them into the game, I am forced to ask the question, "Why not allow Helmets to be toggled invisible. This is not like an MMO where everyone sees what other players are wearing (and even MMOs have cosmetic toggle options). This is a single player game that one may play for their own amusemant. Whether they prefer to cheat with console commands, or mod something out, or whatever they prefer to do has absolutely no bearing on anyone's gameplay experience but their own. So why should they be ridiculed for it?

Now I do have to say that any furture cosmetic options that may or may not get added should take an EXTREME back seat to bug fixes and actual gameplay mechanics. But if harmless requests like this can be fulfilled in the process, they should be.

All this means is that any given suggestion is by definition not absurd so long as it's an option.

Fine.

Where are my machine guns? I want machine guns. If you don't like them then don't use them because IT'S AN OPTION and it's a single player game. :wallbash: The IT'S AN OPTION argument means nothing except "I don't want to argue this idea on the merits."
User avatar
Alessandra Botham
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:27 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:42 am

I found a great mod that turns ALL head gear invisible and you still keep stats

its pretty cool

although I like the look of some helmets like the ebony, orcish, steel plate ..etc

actually only helms that bug me are the light dragon helm and steel horned helm and dwemer helm when worn with other armor sets (its good when u wear it with dwemer armro :P)
User avatar
Tanya
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:01 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:51 am

I think the real problem is that a lot of helmets in the game look totally stupid.

If they added better looking helmets I'd happily wear them.

Couple of examples:

[img]http://www.theknightshop.co.uk/catalog/images/KIH.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www.swordsandarmor.com/images/H002203_White_Knight_Helmet.JPG[/img]
I think those helmets look stupider than the ones in-game. In fact, I like almost all the In-game helms, except for the way they keep cutting the backs off of the helms Khajiit wear, for some inexplicable purpose.
User avatar
ONLY ME!!!!
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:16 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:07 pm

I like the helmets, and I don't care to use any "hide Helmet" option. It just doesn't feel right to me that a person would put on all kinds of restrictive armor for protection, just to skimp out on using a helmet to protect one of the most vulnerable areas of the body, because it doesn't "look cool". Also, all that armor isn't really meant to look attractive, it's meant to protect, not to be a fashion statement. At best, if any kind of aesthetic is involved at all, it's meant to be intimidating, fearsome, and yes, occasionally, downright ugly.
Not wearing (or hiding) helmets is just one of my personal "immersion breakers". YYMV, of course.
User avatar
Dragonz Dancer
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:01 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:37 pm

The best solution would be better looking helmets. There are many excellent real world examples that can be used by BETHESDA as inspiration. The only helmets in the game that I like are the Helm of Yngol, the male version of the Ancient Nord Helm and the male and female version of the Iron Helm. Those helmets would look good even without the horns. The female version of the Ancient Nord Helm would look great without the Antlers that are attached to it now, or with horns instead of antlers.

The Skyrim Roman helmets are not badly made, if one likes Roman armour - which I do not.

The steel plate armour, ebony and Daedric helmets are either too small or too weird looking. The Dragon Bone heavy helmet would look better if made completely of steel and without the bone part at the back. I personally find the Dragon armour just too exotic looking, too primitive and underwhelming in a word.

The Blades helmet is not that bad looking, the armour though is a weird mix or Roman and Japanese Armour styles. The Wolf Armour and helmet are a weird mix of primitive and Roman looking style armour.

Another strange thing is that some helmets will clip the hair straight through it, allowing for a weird appearance. I am surprised that this was allowed past the Bethesda Quality Control team.

The steel plate armour and Ebony Cuirass look really nice and it really is a shame that the corresponding helmets are such a mismatch for those two armours.

Although off-topic, I would suggest to have both better designed realistic real world helmets and less armour with skirts, since Northern Europeans (on which the Skyrim Nords are loosely based) have since ages worn trousers instead of skirts. Chain mail does not count as a skirt to be sure, but in Skyrim so many of the early "heavy" armour and the "light" armour types have either skirts or a sort of chain mail without trousers underneath, which for male characters is kind of silly to look at - to use an understatement.
User avatar
Carlos Rojas
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:19 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim