The new skin, thread 2

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 3:43 am

Just Checked the Profile Editing Tab.. They completely removed the notes feature!

I know most of you don't know what it was, but I used it quite often as Microsoft Word doesn't like to work properly on my computer. I had a good amount of writing saved in there. Not Cool. :thumbsdown:
User avatar
chloe hampson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:15 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 1:28 pm

Just Checked the Profile Editing Tab.. They completely removed the notes feature!
I know most of you don't know what it was, but I used it quite often as Microsoft Word doesn't like to work properly on my computer. I had a good amount of writing saved in there. Not Cool. :thumbsdown:

That svcks man, it was a useful feature. I used mine for a few things. Nothing important though - Luckily
User avatar
Assumptah George
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:43 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 6:24 am

I don't like how join date was removed, that made it easier for me to know who to take seriously and otherwise, but I've noticed that on my crap computer from 2003 running Google Chrome, the forums are significantly faster. I like the update so far, I suppose.
User avatar
Amy Cooper
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:38 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:56 am

Yes but it looks like trash now.
Still better than the default

Though, I'd prefer they didn't change it at all.
User avatar
Neil
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:08 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 7:42 am

Just Checked the Profile Editing Tab.. They completely removed the notes feature!

I know most of you don't know what it was, but I used it quite often as Microsoft Word doesn't like to work properly on my computer. I had a good amount of writing saved in there. Not Cool. :thumbsdown:

I had forgotten about that thingy! Now I wonder what I had stored in that... oh the horror.

PINKIE PIE IS BOUNCING AGAIN! She's alive, thank Celestia!
User avatar
Chris Jones
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 3:11 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:31 pm

I don't like how join date was removed, that made it easier for me to know who to take seriously and otherwise...

Elitist nonsense. Not to mention that a pervasive attitude of that nature is not conducive to building a welcoming and friendly environment.
User avatar
hannah sillery
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:13 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 10:46 am

Elitist nonsense. Not to mention that a pervasive attitude of that nature is not conducive to building a welcoming and friendly environment.
Join date is usually a good reference point, sure it involves generalisiations but it can be helpful to people new to TES

For example, someone is more likely to explain who Vivec is in an explanation to someone who joined in 2010 than someone who joined in 2005 (and probably not shoot them down as much)
That said, there is more of a whack a noob mentality on this board than when I joined.
User avatar
Philip Lyon
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:08 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 1:57 am

Elitist nonsense.
Not elitist at all. There is just no reason not to have the join date there in the first place. I'm just guessing the admins are tweaking some things a bit.
User avatar
Jon O
 
Posts: 3270
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:48 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 10:56 am

Not elitist at all. There is just no reason not to have the join date there in the first place. I'm just guessing the admins are tweaking some things a bit.

There is also no reason to have it there. If you require a date next to someone's name to judge the quality of their posts then you're doing it wrong.
User avatar
Ian White
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:08 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 2:50 am

Smexy forum skin is smexy.
User avatar
Karine laverre
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:50 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:04 am

Not elitist at all. There is just no reason not to have the join date there in the first place. I'm just guessing the admins are tweaking some things a bit.
I don't know, have you noticed that the join date has been replaced with the post count?

And is it just me or have the MultiQuote and Quote buttons switched positions?
User avatar
J.P loves
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:03 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 8:11 am

Elitist nonsense. Not to mention that a pervasive attitude of that nature is not conducive to building a welcoming and friendly environment.

Oh no I know, we were all new here at one point. But having stars and join date next to each other was a good referencing point, if someone had 3 stars and joined 4 months ago, how seriously are you gonna take them? Obviously their post is the most important part, but I liked having the reference. Also, it just looks cool seeing someone from like 2003. Don't find it as interesting seeing someone with 3 or 4 stars, just not the same.
User avatar
Sophie Louise Edge
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:09 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:07 pm

I don't know, have you noticed that the join date has been replaced with the post count?

And is it just me or have the MultiQuote and Quote buttons switched positions?
Post count really doesn't signify anything
User avatar
Rachel Eloise Getoutofmyface
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:20 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 11:46 am

Post count really doesn't signify anything
I don't know, it can be used in the same way, really. The point was that the place that had been where the Join Date was has been replaced with the Post Count.
User avatar
naomi
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:58 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 5:26 am

There is also no reason to have it there. If you require a date next to someone's name to judge the quality of their posts then you're doing it wrong.
I refuse to take this advice unless your account is atlest 3 years old :P

I couldnt care less about join date. People who have been here years can be s smart/dumb as people who joined recently. Who knows, without the date, people may be less bised towards peoples posts.
User avatar
xemmybx
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:01 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 11:33 am

Oh no I know, we were all new here at one point. But having stars and join date next to each other was a good referencing point, if someone had 3 stars and joined 4 months ago, how seriously are you gonna take them? Obviously their post is the most important part, but I liked having the reference. Also, it just looks cool seeing someone from like 2003. Don't find it as interesting seeing someone with 3 or 4 stars, just not the same.

You take them seriously, or not, based on the content of their post. To do anything else is unreasonable. A poster could join in the next ten minutes and post the most insightful thing that you have ever read; but a mentality that uses join date as a gauge to potential quality of content would likely never read that post.
User avatar
Georgine Lee
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:50 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 8:10 am

I don't know, it can be used in the same way, really. The point was that the place that had been where the Join Date was has been replaced with the Post Count.
Join date tells you a bit about a person, someone who joined in late 2010 probably joined to get information Skyrim before release, someone who joined in 2006-07 probably joined for Oblivion or pre-release information about Fallout etc.

And a low post count with an early release date (stereotypically) means well thought out posts vice-versa

and besides, the stars already represent the post count better than the number
And is it just me or are the forum ranks written below the stars/black dots a different color now?


You take them seriously, or not, based on the content of their post. To do anything else is unreasonable. A poster could join in the next ten minutes and post the most insightful thing that you have ever read; but a mentality that uses join date as a gauge to potential quality of content would likely never read that post.
I doubt that anyone does that, it is more a gauge of whether a slightly pointless topic is meant to be humorous or spammy, and besides I don't take anyone seriously who has no avatar :P
User avatar
Kate Norris
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:12 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 6:58 am

I, for one, welcome our new streamlined forum overlord!

Also, Community Discussion is now available on the main page finally. Fantastic!
User avatar
Jeff Tingler
 
Posts: 3609
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:55 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 2:50 am

Join date tells you a bit about a person, someone who joined in late 2010 probably joined to get information Skyrim before release, someone who joined in 2006-07 probably joined for Oblivion or pre-release information about Fallout etc.

And a low post count with an early release date (stereotypically) means well thought out posts vice-versa


That basically summed it up. I just liked the join date more than post count, is all.
User avatar
Chris Cross Cabaret Man
 
Posts: 3301
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:33 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 11:57 am

Join date tells you a bit about a person, someone who joined in late 2010 probably joined to get information Skyrim before release, someone who joined in 2006-07 probably joined for Oblivion or pre-release information about Fallout etc.

And a low post count with an early release date (stereotypically) means well thought out posts vice-versa

I don't know - Most of my posts (I think) are well thought out.
Most of my posts are in the Fan-Fic forum where they have to be well thought out.
A low post count may just signify little activity; in such case a users join date may mis-represent a forum users level of 'experience'.
User avatar
Iain Lamb
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 4:47 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 6:56 am

I refuse to take this advice unless your account is atlest 3 years old :P

I couldnt care less about join date. People who have been here years can be s smart/dumb as people who joined recently. Who knows, without the date, people may be less bised towards peoples posts.

But it totally is 3 years old. :biggrin:

I guess that makes me better than you. :teehee:
User avatar
BlackaneseB
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:21 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 12:04 pm

I don't know - Most of my posts (I think) are well thought out.
Most of my posts are in the Fan-Fic forum where they have to be well thought out.
A low post count may just signify little activity; in such case a users join date may mis-represent a forum users level of 'experience'.
Thats why I said stereotypically
I'd like to think my posts are well thought out as well and, in the scheme of things 2007 isn't exactly a recent join date.

I just think post count is redundant personally
User avatar
Kanaoka
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:24 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:50 pm

Thats why I said stereotypically
I'd like to think my posts are well thought out as well and, in the scheme of things 2007 isn't exactly a recent join date.

I just think post count is redundant personally

Haha, we're the old boys now. I think it requires a mixture of both to represent a decent level of forum experience.
However I must comment that I believe this is kind of getting off topic. :P
User avatar
Crystal Birch
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:34 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 2:03 am

But it totally is 3 years old. :biggrin:

I guess that makes me better than you. :teehee:
He has had other accounts in the past, Crow.
User avatar
sexy zara
 
Posts: 3268
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:53 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 3:01 am

Join date tells you a bit about a person, someone who joined in late 2010 probably joined to get information Skyrim before release, someone who joined in 2006-07 probably joined for Oblivion or pre-release information about Fallout etc.

And a low post count with an early release date (stereotypically) means well thought out posts vice-versa

and besides, the stars already represent the post count better than the number
And is it just me or are the forum ranks written below the stars/black dots a different color now?

Well as someone pushing patriarch status and joined in late 2008 - I see your point. but ultimately disagree.

I've earned most of my posts/stars in the mods forums of the game - pretty much exclusively. I see others with as many posts and I never see them in the mods forum, but they are all over the community threads.

Doesn't matter when they join as much because a person could still only sign up and post a few nonesense words in threads and do that every 6 months. Or they get a new username every year but are as old as daggerfall dirt.

This info is just not telling enough in that regard - and if you don't agree - post 5000 more then we can talk.
User avatar
Setal Vara
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games