Yes lying is generally less honorable than telling it how it is.
He isn't telling him how it is; he's threatening him and essentially saying "join me or die".
Cecilff2 said: "We don't really have the luxury of knowing that. The terms we do know do not include allowing thalmor agents to take whoever they want."I believe they are allowed to arrest and interrogate anyone they suspect of being a Talos-worshipper. Now obviously this is a very grey area, and there's enough to go on. For all we know, they could be doing a "good job" and eing very careful in their selection, or they could just be total [censored]s and take whoever they want.
"And completely legal by Nord standards. Empire hasn't interfered with their succession rites in the past, nor did they attempt to stop the duel whatsoever."To be fair, that was the Septim Empire AND it's considered an
ancient Nord tradition that is hardly done. Ulfric was the first in a long time. The reason they made no attempts to stop the duel, is because Ulfric springed it on Torygg at the last minute, and then ran out of Solitude.
"1. Are the thalmor actually bretons?"I'm sorry, what? What do Bretons have to do with this?
"2. Popular Imperial dialogue: I can't wait to kill me another of Ulfric's boys."Huh. I'll be honest, I've never heard that dialogue in any of my playthroughs.
"3. http://www.imperial-library.info/content/decree-monument" No, it's not. First off, the Decree of Monument was in 4E 20, over 180 years before when the game Skyrim takes place. Ulfric and many of his supporters treat them very differently than the Kings and Jarls of old.
http://elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/Gray_Quarter
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Skyrim:Windhelm
4. Upon entering Markarth you are greeted by a man shouting "For the Forsworn" and stabbing a woman in the back. It has just as much relation to the imperials that Rolff has to the stormcloaks.
How?
5. Good thing he's not a stormcloak then.
But he supports the Stormcloaks. Somewhat foreboding and leaves a bit of a bad taste in your mouth, does it not?
You should try going down to the docks and see how the dark elf in the office treats the argonians. There is some majorly bad blood there. Even Brunwulf doesn't let the argonians in the city if imperials win. It's because they will KILL each other.
Yes, because the Dunmer used Argonians as slaves for centuries (if not millenia) and the Argonians are still on top after kicking Morrowind's ass when they invaded/attacked after the Red Year. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to defend the Dunmer's racism and enslavement of Argonians (I loved freeing slaves whenever I could in Morrowind), but the sheer hatred that exists between the Dunmer and Argonians is kind of understandable, even if you only look on relatively recent events in their mutual history.
Mind stating what's incorrect?
Nothing is incorrect; I'm right in saying that Heimskr is a touch nutty.
Yes Ulfric had the right to kill the High King. Torygg's court will even tell you it was legal.
Really? Falk Firebeard says that?
Raizen said: "Ralof is not a stormcloak so what you just said about him is invalid."And with that, you have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt how wrong you are about so many things. Ralof is clearly a Stormcloak, and I'm not gonna waste any more breath on you if you seriously believe something like this.
Ralof IS a Stormcloak, Raizen Sama. That's why he's in the cart with Ulfric, Lokir, and the Dragonborn....
Raizen, it's the Altmer that primarily make up the Aldmeri Dominion. They despise Dunmer, in fact.
THANK YOU, Serethil and L33ty; you have saved me the trouble.
