Why We Are Mad: The Thread

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 2:16 pm

Well this may be sloppy because I'm typing it from a mobile device but...

I also know the lore very well and so do many others. In fact in the lore forum here we came to a consensus that it is actually NOT stepping on the lore. It's fine that you don't think it's lore friendly but you should support your claims if you want to be taken seriously. Enemies have worked together before. Even the worst of them. Sparta and Athens worked together against the Persians and they hated one another. Germans collaborated with the Japanese in WWII and they would have incredibly different outlooks and both were both rather radical purists.

The Nords even have worked with the Dunmer before. I think you have preconceived notions of how the races would have acted but not a whole lot to support those notions. Not all the Dunmer are racist slave owners and not all the Nords are Mer killing beer swilling barbarian warriors.

You are underestimating practicality. You would be very surprised by what normal people will turn to when they are desperate enough. You and no one else including me truly knows how people in Tamriel thought back then either. With the growing pressure from the newly formed Aldmeri Dominion and Daggerfall Covenant as well as the chaos brewing in Cyrodiil with their Imperial kin falling under the power of the machinations of a Masterfull Necromancer and a Daedric Prince. In desperation where would they turn if the Daggerfall Covenant wasn't interested or only wanted their surrender? They may not get along famously with the Dunmer but there is nothing to suggest they would not work together begrudgingly.

It is not really that incredulous, and I am a hardcoe Nord and Dunmer fan, well aware of how they view one another. However even recent views when taken into account are promising. The Nords took in the Dunmer refugees and did not interfere with their claimant of Solstheim in the 4th Era. The most recent views of the Nords as true Mer haters in Skyrim is mostly due to recent events and the Thalmor as well as the whole thing with the Falmer. Even that has things that excuse the Nords hatred of Mer, initially they got along with the Falmer but then the Eye of Magnus was discovered and the Night of Tears happened. They even respectfully buried the leader of hte Falmer, the Snow Prince in a gesture of respect.

In the past the Dunmer and Nords respected one another even when they did hate each other in the various wars and disputes they have had. They are not far fetched.

Now here's where it is touchy ground. The Argonians. We simply need more info than we have. But going off what I know I will try to explain. As far as I know at the time the MMO is taking place is a rather bad time for Black Marsh. There are hordes of Bandits and Pirates everywhere and Imperial Warlords are scattered throughout the province ruling the old pre-Potentate Empire's old holdings. How organized the Argonians are at this point is unknown. There was a major spike in slaves at this time I believe. We know the Argonians sold their own into slavery and similar to the various rival tribes in Africa most of the actual slave nabbing was done by locals like the Archeins. Here is something interesting.

Archeins: During the era when other races tried to put plantations in Argonia, Archeins were very powerful, and made fortunes by selling other Argonians into slavery. Since the other races realized Argonia is unfit for plantations, they have gone bankrupt.

This could mean the Archeins are in control and are on very friendly terms with the Dunmer for the purpose of selling slaves. I think that Black Marsh is a bit of a Kleptocracy during this period and even until later in the 3rd Era. Of interest is the

Now if this is the case or even if it is not, the Argonians need protection from the Dunmer slaving interests and the growing threats of the other powers as well as the whole Molag Bal and Mannimarco thing with the Imperials. The way they are getting there protection from the Dunmer might be that they intend for this alliance to improve the relations with the Dunmer and possibly convince the Dunmer they are not lesser beings. It also is worth mentioning that the Dunmer and Nords supposedly approached the Argonians after working out their own deal. When two peoples that consider your people to be inferior ask for your help when you need it, you kind of feel a need to prove yourself and them wrong. Just working a theory here. It is also possible the Hist, Greybeards and the Tribunal had some fun kind of commute and that netted them a necessary if unstable alliance with old hatreds by nature being a common problem and those problems commonly rearing their ugly little heads.

I don't know who you trying to convince but all i'm saying the story svcks in my opinion and im not the only one think this. Go to youtube and many other sites and actual listen to fans and players then saying (you should support your claims if you want to be taken seriously). You can explain and defend this story all you want but at the end its what every fan and player wants. all we could do is wait like i said many times again. You can Keep on defending all you want and you could like it all you want - doesnt mean rest of us is going to like it or going to except it in the lore that we all grew into. Like i said before and again- its going to be good or its not. I'm going to wait and see how it goes and see how the other fans and players take it also. You have to remember from that last novel you wrote to me- This isn't reality but a game that has a rich Lore that made it popular. It is still a game, also book novels and at the end - it wins a person personal imagination or it doest. Not every one is going to agree with you and there version of the Lore. I've been a long time fan but this game will kill some fans and players because of the MMO part, Lore or any other reason. I didn't understand why you wrote that whole novel when i knew alot of it already and disagree with you on many parts. My opinion of the game, lore and many others still stand.
User avatar
Charles Mckinna
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 1:22 pm

Yes, I do believe that both studios want to make the Elder Scrolls Online a profitable product and do good business with it. But this does not necessarily mean that they agree on how to do so. So, as a result, my question does stand as unanswered.

But, on Page 1 of the thread entitled "Zenimax or Bethesda? [merged similar topics]," I noticed that BootySweat said something very interesting in post #2:


Source: http://www.gamesas.com/topic/1371383-zenimax-or-bethesda-merged-similar-topics/

If this is true for each studio's official vision and its resulting general vision, then could this not mean that Bethesda Gaming Studios and Zenimax Online Studios have different and disagreeing visions for the Elder Scrolls Online?

This certainly seems possible. For instance, consider what Todd Howard told joystiq:


Source: http://www.joystiq.com/2011/08/31/todd-howard-on-skyrims-worthwhile-glitches-mmos-and-when-big-i/

What do you think about this, Umrahel?
I think it's very possible that ZOS and BGS have differing opinions, which is pretty much explained by Todd's comment you quoted. BGS is all about single player and how to do that to the best of their capabilities and they have no interest themselves in making a multiplayer TES. ZOS is specifically founded for that very reason - to make a multiplayer TES. So, yes, that is one major difference between the two of them in how they look at TES.

But it's also a bit of a hypothetical question, because BGS never considered a multiplayer TES, at least not recently and not openly so we don't know how they would do certain things. And ZOS never spoke about what they'd do with a single player game either, which makes it hard to compare how each studio would do the other's work.

Are there differing opinions on certain game elements that will be present in TES Online? No doubt. Everyone has an opinion, devs are no different from that. Are there disagreeing views? We'll never know, because their PR department wouldn't do a good job if internal strive and issues would come out to the open.
User avatar
Travis
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:57 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 6:39 pm

I don't know who you trying to convince but all i'm saying the story svcks in my opinion and im not the only one think this. Go to youtube and many other sites and actual listen to fans and players then saying (you should support your claims if you want to be taken seriously). You can explain and defend this story all you want but at the end its what every fan and player wants. all we could do is wait like i said many times again. You can Keep on defending all you want and you could like it all you want - doesnt mean rest of us is going to like it or going to except it in the lore that we all grew into. Like i said before and again- its going to be good or its not. I'm going to wait and see how it goes and see how the other fans and players take it also. You have to remember from that last novel you wrote to me- This isn't reality but a game that has a rich Lore that made it popular. It is still a game, also book novels and at the end - it wins a person personal imagination or it doest. Not every one is going to agree with you and there version of the Lore. I've been a long time fan but this game will kill some fans and players because of the MMO part, Lore or any other reason. I didn't understand why you wrote that whole novel when i knew alot of it already and disagree with you on many parts. My opinion of the game, lore and many others still stand.
Just saying there is nothing inherently lore breaking about it. I also did that for more than just you. It just needed to be done. I was not saying the support your claims part to be antagonistic, I was saying it to provoke you into telling me why you think it breaks the Lore with some evidence for it.

I am of the opinion that the story sounds a good deal contrived and over the top with Molag Bal supposedly pulling Tamriel into his realm but I don't necessarily see it as Lore breaking. Just kind of 'meh' sounding. But it could be good so I am on the fence with that part.

Also I did not write a novel the first time. It was like a paragraph or two? Is one page of text that intimidating to people?

If it makes you feel better that Wall-O-Text was made into its own thread and refined with further evidence and yes speculation. Feel free to browse or not. Up to you. http://www.gamesas.com/topic/1373131-on-factions-let-us-figure-out-how-they-work-in-the-lore-me-first/
User avatar
Manuela Ribeiro Pereira
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:24 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 3:32 am

Just saying there is nothing inherently lore breaking about it. I also did that for more than just you. It just needed to be done. I was not saying the support your claims part to be antagonistic, I was saying it to provoke you into telling me why you think it breaks the Lore with some evidence for it.

I am of the opinion that the story sounds a good deal contrived and over the top with Molag Bal supposedly pulling Tamriel into his realm but I don't necessarily see it as Lore breaking. Just kind of 'meh' sounding. But it could be good so I am on the fence with that part.

Also I did not write a novel the first time. It was like a paragraph or two? Is one page of text that intimidating to people?

If it makes you feel better that Wall-O-Text was made into its own thread and refined with further evidence and yes speculation. Feel free to browse or not. Up to you.


Why should i give you evidence- any fool can go online read the lore, read all the book novels and even better, play the game and read the book on there. People know the lore and doesnt need to prove a GAMES lore that can change your Evidence any time. Im just saying Nords of course you also know the lore had a history hating the elves, Dunmer were slave owners. you mention (Not all the Dunmer are racist slave owners and not all the Nords are Mer killing beer swilling barbarian warriors.) You cant judge by individuals but as a whole nation it self and its past. In Reality you can say the same thing as I am Veteran of the Iraqi war wasn't going to war on its people knowing all of them bad when i know alot of those people were actually good. Who is there to say the Dunmer or Nords and Dunmer or Argonian join forces, its own personal imagination and the person took of the lore and how this fake world is made. You can throw Imaginary Evidence and Argue with me and i can give you evidence of my claim- at the end we are argue about something that the developers can change in a blink of an eye. Every thing can go out the window. How this can break the Lore to the fans and players is what I told you and all we can do as fans is sit and wait. Read you evidence all you want on the lore pages but im expressing my opinion and many others that have issues with this story that breaks there version of the lore. There alot of games with many lores- alot of those games failed because they change the lore in way the fans weren't very happy with. Your argument is vain when theres evidence on both sides to argue.
User avatar
Elina
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:09 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 11:12 am

But it's also a bit of a hypothetical question, because BGS never considered a multiplayer TES, at least not recently and not openly so we don't know how they would do certain things. And ZOS never spoke about what they'd do with a single player game either, which makes it hard to compare how each studio would do the other's work.

Are there differing opinions on certain game elements that will be present in TES Online? No doubt. Everyone has an opinion, devs are no different from that. Are there disagreeing views? We'll never know, because their PR department wouldn't do a good job if internal strive and issues would come out to the open.

Fair enough and well said.

My point is that BGS understands the TES series better than ZOS does. So, if BGS is happy with how ZOS is putting their input and suggestions to use, then I would reconsider my view of TES:O as it is shaping up now. Otherwise, my mind will remain unchanged and I will just stick with the single player TES series.

But, as you said, I will never know if BGS's approval of TES:O is genuinely the case or not, unless something out of the ordinary happens. :dry:
User avatar
Jennifer Rose
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:54 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 4:39 pm

Why should i give you evidence- any fool can go online read the lore, read all the book novels and even better, play the game and read the book on there. People know the lore and doesnt need to prove a GAMES lore that can change your Evidence any time. Im just saying Nords of course you also know the lore had a history hating the elves, Dunmer were slave owners. you mention (Not all the Dunmer are racist slave owners and not all the Nords are Mer killing beer swilling barbarian warriors.) You cant judge by individuals but as a whole nation it self and its past. In Reality you can say the same thing as I am Veteran of the Iraqi war wasn't going to war on its people knowing all of them bad when i know alot of those people were actually good. Who is there to say the Dunmer or Nords and Dunmer or Argonian join forces, its own personal imagination and the person took of the lore and how this fake world is made. You can throw Imaginary Evidence and Argue with me and i can give you evidence of my claim- at the end we are argue about something that the developers can change in a blink of an eye. Every thing can go out the window. How this can break the Lore to the fans and players is what I told you and all we can do as fans is sit and wait. Read you evidence all you want on the lore pages but im expressing my opinion and many others that have issues with this story that breaks there version of the lore. There alot of games with many lores- alot of those games failed because they change the lore in way the fans weren't very happy with. Your argument is vain when theres evidence on both sides to argue.

If you go to the lore forum right now, you can find a thread that us lore-monkeys are compiling that explains in detail why this does not break lore.
And it does not.

Main points to make:

-Elder Scrolls races are not your typical lazy fantasy or tv show races where the entire race is the embodiment of a single trope.
Such as, all Ferengi are scheming merchants.
In Elder Scrolls a single race can have many varying and conflicting ideals and political factions.

-Using existing lore a pretty good case can be made as to why these events, in fact, fit known lore.

-Nords have been known to collaborate with Dunmer before and they will do so again in the timeline of the Elder Scrolls.

-Argonians are ruled by the Hist, what an individual Argonian wants is irrelevant and the Hist plays the long game.
The Hist quite possibly see collaboration with Dunmer as sacrifcing a pawn in order to win the game.

-Dunmer follow the Triune. No further explanation needed.
User avatar
Shiarra Curtis
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 2:22 pm

snip
Alright. If you want the Lore to be broken then you can consider it broken. My case is simply that because there is a chance of something happening that means the Lore is not broken. Regardless of your personal feelings on the matter.
User avatar
Kitana Lucas
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 2:44 am

Alright. If you want the Lore to be broken then you can consider it broken. My case is simply that because there is a chance of something happening that means the Lore is not broken. Regardless of your personal feelings on the matter.

lol, isn't also your own personal feelings why the Lore is not broken. of course it is!!!
User avatar
Hayley Bristow
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 12:24 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 6:40 pm

Fair enough and well said.

My point is that BGS understands the TES series better than ZOS does. So, if BGS is happy with how ZOS is putting their input and suggestions to use, then I would reconsider my view of TES:O as it is shaping up now. Otherwise, my mind will remain unchanged and I will just stick with the single player TES series.

But, as you said, I will never know if BGS's approval of TES:O is genuinely the case or not, unless something out of the ordinary happens. :dry:
Maybe it's a comforting thought that the studio who knows everything about TES is only a mail, phone call or lunch away from the studio that is making TES:O.

I think we're now in a bit of a luxury position. We know BGS will continue to make single play TES games, so all is well in that regard. Meanwhile we can just sit back and see how TES:O unfolds without having to worry about whether this will be the future of TES. If we like it, we'll play it. If we don't like it, we'll just leave it be and wait for a BGS TES title to come out next.

We were in a position where only one TES game existed. Now there are two. Take your pick. :goodjob:
User avatar
LijLuva
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:59 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 11:31 am

lol, isn't also your own personal feelings why the Lore is not broken. of course it is!!!
No. It is not opinion. Since I gave a likely reason for them to have formed an alliance it makes it a possibility. Thus not breaking lore. Myself and a good portion of the Lore forum have come to the consensus that there is nothing inherently broken in the Lore, yet. For something to break Lore you have to have evidence of it. Like a previously dead character being alive with no explanation for it. Or the Tribunal not existing at this point. If it brought the lore somewhere you don't like then that is fine, however it does not mean it is broken.
User avatar
Kyra
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:24 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 2:38 am

I think we're now in a bit of a luxury position. We know BGS will continue to make single play TES games, so all is well in that regard. Meanwhile we can just sit back and see how TES:O unfolds without having to worry about whether this will be the future of TES. If we like it, we'll play it. If we don't like it, we'll just leave it be and wait for a BGS TES title to come out next.

I and many others will hold you to that promise. :deal: :goodjob:

Thanks for reading and replying. :smile:
User avatar
Rowena
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:40 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:42 am

yeah your own personal Lore Evidence. Your Evidence is still Vain. Any Developer can change the lore - do you understand doesnt mean the lore isnt broken- it can still be broken by the intake of fans because this isn't reality we are talking about but a games lore. If the devolers say blue monkeys grew out of a Argonian butt is now part of the lore but if the fans dont take that in then it is broken. like i said your arguement is so vain and your evidence.
User avatar
Shannon Lockwood
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 1:54 pm

blue monkeys grew out of a Argonian butt is not to far off from this fractions on this game
User avatar
john page
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:52 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 2:47 pm

yeah your own personal Lore Evidence. Your Evidence is still Vain. Any Developer can change the lore - do you understand doesnt mean the lore isnt broken- it can still be broken by the intake of fans because this isn't reality we are talking about but a games lore. If the devolers say blue monkeys grew out of a Argonian butt is now part of the lore but if the fans dont take that in then it is broken. like i said your arguement is so vain and your evidence.

I think youre misunderstanding the differences between opinion, postulation, hypothesis and fact.

You may not like the new events, and this is an opinion.

The new events however can be proven to be lore-friendly using logical hypotheses and postulations.
And this is a fact.

For the love of twice Vehk though, please paragraph your posts, its giving me a headache.
User avatar
roxxii lenaghan
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:53 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:15 pm

I think youre misunderstanding the differences between opinion, postulation, hypothesis and fact.
Agreed.

These are not the original Devs. They have to make their new Lore make much more sense than BGS can because we will be more critical of them as a separate studio. BGS can literally make the Argonians have blue monkeys grow out of their butt if they wanted to and guess what? Canon. It is their game and creative processes. All they have to do is provide a reasonable explanation.

However ZOS mustn't make such blatant changes to the Lore. But just because something is controversial does not mean it is wrong. ZOS isn't even doing anything that ridiculous as far as we know. There is literally precedent for this stuff in some cases. What is so hard to believe?
User avatar
Devin Sluis
 
Posts: 3389
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 12:44 pm

I think youre misunderstanding the differences between opinion, postulation, hypothesis and fact.

You may not like the new events, and this is an opinion.

The new events however can be proven to be lore-friendly using logical hypotheses and postulations.
And this is a fact.

For the love of twice Vehk though, please paragraph your posts, its giving me a headache.

Fact? lol how long have you been living on Tamriel. Have you talked to Dunmer latly? lol None of it is fact do you get it. lol lore could be broken or not be broken by the voices of the fans
User avatar
Kevan Olson
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:09 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 3:49 pm

Fact? lol how long have you been living on Tamriel. Have you talked to Dunmer latly? lol None of it is fact do you get it. lol lore could be broken or not be broken by the voices of the fans
No, best you can do is willfully ignore it. Have you talked to http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Morrowind:Galyn_Arvel lately? Do you know what the Dunmer are like in the 2nd Era? Your basis for saying the Lore is broken is simply weak. Just because something is unlikely does not mean it breaks the Lore. The Dwemer returning in the middle of the 2nd Era breaks lore. Divayth Fyr dying in the 2nd Era breaks lore unless an explanation is made for him coming back alive. There is literally nothing that violates the Lore as we know it.
User avatar
Heather Stewart
 
Posts: 3525
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:04 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 9:12 pm

No, best you can do is willfully ignore it. Have you talked to lately? Do you know what the Dunmer are like in the 2nd Era? Your basis for saying the Lore is broken is simply weak.

so is yours. lore in 2nd era the dunmer and nords didnt like each other, other claims they could join forces from the past to. My evidence of the lore the Dunmer and Nords hade a hatred and you cant argue that. for the developers making this new game is base on fans intake. Like i said and said before both evidence could be argue BOTH WAYS. So yours is as weak as mine. The Lore will be broken or not be broken by the fans intake when it comes out. All we can do is wait.
User avatar
LittleMiss
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:22 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 1:27 am

Fact? lol how long have you been living on Tamriel. Have you talked to Dunmer latly? lol None of it is fact do you get it. lol lore could be broken or not be broken by the voices of the fans

And so it came that in the empire interregnum of the second era, Seht scried in pools of liquid fire and what he saw disturbed him. And he told Ayem, who rallied her hands and she told Vehk, who thrust Muatra into a vein of ebony so all of faith could hear his words, and wore his water-face, so all knew he could only speak the truth.

'Heed Dunmer of Morrowind'
Lord Vivec spake.
'A shadow has come over Morrowind, a darkness that dangers Tamriel entire.
But through our love your Tribunal will protect you and steer you to victory, even though sacrifices must be made.
Let us now guide the hands of the Hortator in war and its aftermath. For we go different, and in thunder. This is our destiny.'

And the multitude did raise banners of many colours and so began the march to victory.
User avatar
Carys
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:15 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 4:38 pm

According to the GI article (buy a copy!) Zenimax Online and BGS have been collaborating extensively on lore and geography. One of the hallmarks of TES is learning about the world, forming opinions, and then discovering that your opinion was based on partial knowledge and/or a biased reporting of events. To me TES:O just adds another layer to this.

The things I'm happiest about so far are getting to see all the provinces and what they're doing with world PvP. Getting to participate meaningfully even as a low level character, the opportunities to form temporary alliances and then to stab allies in the back, and to fight to occupy the imperial city all sound really dynamic and interesting to me.
User avatar
Georgia Fullalove
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:48 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:10 pm

Anouther thing about the Dwemer breaking lore can be argue again because they can reappear and disappear again because it wasnt proven they all died but vanished. Do you see what im saying now. Its Broken when the fans decide if its broken
User avatar
tannis
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:21 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 9:32 pm

this isnt reality but a lore and a lore can change as you can see. break any time
User avatar
Lloyd Muldowney
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 2:08 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 3:54 pm

An important point to remember is if Bethesda are happy with the game ZOS are making (whether they have a say or not doesn't matter), from a lore standpoint, then this is an Elder Scrolls game. Maybe in different clothing, but the man beneath the clothes is still TES we know and love.
User avatar
Jessie Butterfield
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:59 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 5:34 pm

Anouther thing about the Dwemer breaking lore can be argue again because they can reappear and disappear again because it wasnt proven they all died but vanished. Do you see what im saying now. Its Broken when the fans decide if its broken

This is fundamentally incorrect as it is not our lore.
We are not the writers and other creative artists at work here, and this is not our universe.

Lore can be broken if things that are nonsensical happen, or if things get retconned or bowdlerised too much to be recognisable.
However, this has not happened yet.

Lastly, you seem to be using the tactic of 'Im the voice of the majority'.
Youre not, this is all just your opinion and many lore-monkeys have already given plausible reasoning as to why this does not break lore.
So far, all Ive seen from your side of the argument is 'Its broken because Im a fan and fans can declare things broken'.
Im sorry, but I disagree. You need to provide reasoning to back up your claim.
User avatar
Cody Banks
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:30 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 3:38 pm

This is fundamentally incorrect as it is not our lore.
We are not the writers and other creative artists at work here, and this is not our universe.

Lore can be broken if things that are nonsensical happen, or if things get retconned or bowdlerised too much to be recognisable.
However, this has not happened yet.

Lastly, you seem to be using the tactic of 'Im the voice of the majority'.
Youre not, this is all just your opinion and many lore-monkeys have already given plausible reasoning as to why this does not break lore.
So far, all Ive seen from your side of the argument is 'Its broken because Im a fan and fans can declare things broken'.
Im sorry, but I disagree. You need to provide reasoning to back up your claim.

You didnt listen what i said from my past post on lets wait and see what happens. So my comment on that post is telling you im not the voice of the many but one of them. I've been chatting with alot of people from many site not only this one and alot say the same thing as I. Again again my claim the Nords, dunmer and arganion have hatred past and you cant argue that when i cant argue your claim. So your claim is vain as mine.
User avatar
Ray
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:17 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games