Anyone else's opinions on the rebellion completely change at

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:31 am

I was with the stormcloaks for awhile mainly cause the empire made an attempt on my life. but when I learned how racist the stormcloaks are to every other race even the beast races who have done nothing to them at all and that coward backstabber power hungrey racist manchild ulfric was I went back to the empire.

Try Morrowind as a non-Dunmer character, and experience some real racism.
User avatar
Dewayne Quattlebaum
 
Posts: 3529
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:29 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:21 pm

Try Morrowind as a non-Dunmer character, and experience some real racism.
Been there and dealed with that and thats why I think the dummer deserve anything and everything they get.
User avatar
Monique Cameron
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:30 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:51 pm

I say I joined the Empire, and rid the whole of Skyrim of Stormcloak rebel scum. Now the Argonians and Dunmer of Windhelm all praise me for fighting for what was truly right in our Hearts.

Tamriel is for all races, not just nords or thalmors. "Racist" nords will feel the wrath of Sithis. I'd love to see your faces when a Wood Elf is named High King of Skyrim.
User avatar
Kanaoka
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:24 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:32 pm

I would guess their faces would look similar to the wood elves if a Nord was ever made High King of Valenwood
User avatar
Matt Gammond
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:40 am

Tamriel is for all races, not just nords or thalmors. "Racist" nords will feel the wrath of Sithis. I'd love to see your faces when a Wood Elf is named High King of Skyrim.
Yeah, I'd love to see yours when the moot tells the "little elf" to go back where you came from. You're still fighting on behalf of Nords- the people who subjugated those other races with a giant robot. And did nothing for Valenwood when the Dominion came to call other than some covert nannying.
User avatar
Jack Moves
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:43 pm

Don't fast travel :wink:

I've had a few random encounters with random civilians, including dunmeri, in Estmarch and Rift, who tell me that they are on their way to Solitude to join Legion.
There are random encounters with Dunmer and redguard going to join the Stormcloaks, too.

One more thing that I don't see mentioned (much?) in countless Stormcloak vs Empire threads. If they so love and heed and worship Talos, why don't they fight and rebild and reunite the very same Empire that Talos fought for, built, united and ruled? Instead, with Talos' name on their lips, they help Dominion to ruin completely everything that Talos built.
So you want to see Ulfric turn around and conquer Cyrodiil if he wins?
User avatar
Rob Davidson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:52 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:17 pm

I'm for the Empire, but not the Emperor and Elder Council. The Empire as an idea, as a cause, is much better than the Stormcloaks' racist "Skyrim for the Nords and no one else" movement. While the Emperor and Council (i.e., those responsible for kowtowing to the *#&$! Thalmor) are as equally bad as Ulfric, their reign won't last forever (and actually, didn't, if you follow a certain storyline). There's always hope a good leader will rise and remake the Empire into the way it should be.
User avatar
Lexy Corpsey
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:39 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:30 pm

I didn't really have any opinion initially, but now i feel the i'll treat the Stromcloaks the same as the Legion in New Vegas; sided with them once to see their side, and kill them from now on :hehe:
User avatar
christelle047
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:08 am

I'm for the Empire, but not the Emperor and Elder Council. The Empire as an idea, as a cause, is much better than the Stormcloaks' racist "Skyrim for the Nords and no one else" movement. While the Emperor and Council (i.e., those responsible for kowtowing to the *#&$! Thalmor) are as equally bad as Ulfric, their reign won't last forever (and actually, didn't, if you follow a certain storyline). There's always hope a good leader will rise and remake the Empire into the way it should be.
By conquering the other territories again? Remember that Black Marsh and Elsweyr seceded voluntarily, and I doubt Hammerfell is going to gladly be ruled over again. It's a strange sort of ideal that puts colonialism over the Nords' isolationism and finds the former more palatable. I think people can't have a very realistic idea of what an empire means- subjugation.
User avatar
Esther Fernandez
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:52 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:35 am

Ulfric comes off as racist, but hanging around in the Palace and in Windhelm convinced me otherwise. Also, one needs to remember a few things about Dunmer culture before casting accusations. The same is true of Argonians.

A conversation occasionally comes up with Ulfric where his steward mentions unrest in the Grey Quarter. Ulfric points out that he's in the middle of a civil war and therefore has bigger problems. The Butcher incident also can be attributed to this. And look around in Windhelm, there are several Dunmer and Altmer running around without having much issue. There's a Dunmer bard singing Ulfric's praises in the inn, there's an Altmer merchant working in the merchant area (I do have some speculation that she's actually a Thalmor spy), there's a Dunmer who owns a farm and another Altmer tending horses.

Next, let's look at the culture of the Dunmer. The Dunmer are as a race enormously proud. Some of them are as egotistical as the Thalmor are (Remember the Telvanni in Morrowind?) They have a bad habit of not accepting help and placing blame on everyone else for their ills. They've always had a very cold attitude towards the Empire as a whole, and individual races get a frozen shoulder from them most of the time.

As far as the Argonians go, the Argonians aren't well liked in Skyrim to begin with. The executioner in Solitude mention's he'd like "a chance at that Jaree-Ra's scrawny neck" and to be honest, it's kind of understandable. The Argonians have as much of a reputation for duplicity as the Khajiit have, maybe even more so.
User avatar
Kirsty Wood
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:14 am

I didn't really have any opinion initially, but now i feel the i'll treat the Stromcloaks the same as the Legion in New Vegas; sided with them once to see their side, and kill them from now on :hehe:

Could never bring myself to work with Caeser so I just stuck to killen em.Also never got around to working with the NCR but I didn't kill em.They seemed like decent enough folks
User avatar
Breanna Van Dijk
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:18 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:18 am

agree with the OP. The outlawing of Talos was a necessary evil to establish peace again (however temporary that may be). And I can't see the Stormcloaks singlehandely fighting off the Aldmeri Dominion. I quickly realized that Ulfric totally lacks any common sense and, while I haven't finished the civil war quests yet, it is quite apparent that he is an asset to the Thalmor whether he realizes that or not.
User avatar
Susan
 
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:43 am

Midway through the stormcloaks questline i realized what jerks they were, playing as an argonian. Unfortunately i was too far in to change :(
On my next char i picked the empire instead. (they got some mighty cool armor!)
User avatar
Ann Church
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:41 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:03 pm

Could never bring myself to work with Caeser so I just stuck to killen em.

Yeah, only did it once myself. Didn't chance my opinion of them one bit. And to spite them i did with a female character. I troll'd Caesar good :lmao:
User avatar
Sheeva
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:12 pm

Imperials wanted my head, Stormcloaks won't give me the time of day, they can both go and do a running jump....

FTR: I have done both questlines with previous characters, (both a Nord and a Wood Elf). If anyone's right, it's the Imperials. Ulfric is a dictator, if it wasn't for the fact the Imperials wanted me dead, I'd like them more.
User avatar
Stephanie Nieves
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:52 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:26 pm

the empire has failed, they fell pray to the thalmor's cunning when they sighned the WGC, they are as good as dead because there is no way they will be able to fight the dominion, they just aren't smart enough and while they are building their forces for some sort of defence, the thalmor is sitting in there strategy room monitoring everything.

the time for prevention tactics (such as crap anti-religeon contracts) has passed, we are now in serious damage control. What the nords need is what the empire stands for, the problem is that the empire no longer works that way and is now just a decaying apple waiting for that one glorious seed to drop into the soil and grow another mighty apple tree, I believe the stormcloaks are that apple seed. When the stormcloaks are put back in charge they open the way for a much more powerful force, not only will the empire retreat and rally their forces back in their own land (which further protects it's own people from the thalmor, thus providing a stronger point of power against the thalmor) but the nords will have a political power intent on defending skyrims right to remain nord (while this is still racist to a degree, the thalmor would ask that you bow down to them as once gods, so while the empire isn't racist, there masters are) this means that they will take action against the thalmor, in a time of war you need a war leader, and skyrim is going to go to war one way or another, and elsif sure as hell ain't ready for that.

also, I have no doubt that the stormcloak government would be able to establish a very strong alliance with the empire, because once all is said and done the only issues that the stormcloaks have with the empire are their submission to the thalmor (and lets face it, the empire don't like the thalmor any more than the stormcloaks, so this hurdle will be overcome when the empire admits that they were backed into a corner, and made some very poor moves, like agreeing to ban talos worship) and the fact that the empire is controlling skyrim, once they are kicked out and accept that skyrim doesn't belong to them I'm sure they will find themselves as great equals, as long as they respect each others borders/beliefs.
User avatar
Holli Dillon
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:54 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:43 pm

When I think about it there is one thing about this racism discussion I find peculiar: The Dunmer were extremely racist and slavers to boot in Morrowind and they are loved for it, but the moment the Nords are pro-Nord they are the bad guys?
I hated the dark elves in Morrowind, aided the pro-slave freedom movement, and slughtered every damn Redoran and Telvanni who made racist comments at the would-be Nerevarine. This said, Nords are not racist, they've just that 'backyard' primitive mentality of people who cannot see past their own little porch.
User avatar
Love iz not
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:55 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:26 am

I hated the dark elves in Morrowind, aided the pro-slave freedom movement, and slughtered every damn Redoran and Telvanni who made racist comments at the would-be Nerevarine. This said, Nords are not racist, they've just that 'backyard' primitive mentality of people who cannot see past their own little porch.
Because they want to fight the Thalmor rather than bend over for them? Both Galmar and Ulfric talk about working with other nations and the real fight being with the Dominion.
User avatar
Bedford White
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:09 am

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:14 pm

Ulfric is a dictator

Ulfric isn't tthe one telling people who they can and cannot worship. He also holds audiences with his critics, such as Ambarys.
User avatar
Saul C
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:41 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:25 pm

The Civil War seems too "civil." It is hard for me to get motivated either way because it doesn't seem like anything is really wrong in Skyrim. Outside of the opening event, that is the only true tense moment I felt between Stormcloaks and Imperials.
User avatar
IM NOT EASY
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:19 am

Because they want to fight the Thalmor rather than bend over for them? Both Galmar and Ulfric talk about working with other nations and the real fight being with the Dominion.
So instead of making guerrilla actions against the Thalmor occupants, stockpiling resources and building an army to protect Skyrim, they rally against the empire-aligned Jarls and keep Tulius' legions locked in a stalemate (thus preventing the empire from regaining the necessary strength to face the Dominion again in open field). Ooh, good startegy!

Ok, Nords hate the empire for the shameful peace treaty. This doesn't change the fact the if the empire is a burden and a threat to Skyrim, the Thalmor are even a bigger enemy!

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. If the Jarl of Morthal and Whiterun can understand this, why the Stormlocaks can't? They're too busy shouting "Skyrim belongs to the Nords" to do some simple math.
User avatar
Auguste Bartholdi
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:20 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:31 am

The empire has stacked the deck, so he says, by hand-picking jarls and lining their pockets. Balgruuf is a good example, though Elisif is the most blatant and a milk drinker besides. So he has to even the score by gaining an upper hand militarily.

You don't see Tullius calling a moot. He'd sneer at the idea.

A lot of the jarls supported Ulfric. Even Balgruuf wouldn't let the Empire garrison troops in Whiterun. There are no Imperial troops in that City.

Ulfric should have called for the moot before warring with his fellow jarls. Instead of calling for a moot, Ulfric says this when you first come across him in Windhelm:

Spoiler

Ulfric: You think I need to send Balgruuf a stronger message.
Galmar: If by message you mean shoving a sword through his gullet.
Ulfric: Taking his city and leaving him in disgrace would make a more powerful statement, dont you think?
Galmar: So we're ready to start this war in earnest then?
Ulfric: Soon.
Galmar: I still say you should take them all out like you did Deadking Torygg.
Ulfric: Torygg was merely a message to the other Jarls. Whoever we replace them with will need the support of our armies.

That is not the way to become the legitimate king of Skyrim. He should have called for a moot.
User avatar
Andrew Tarango
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:07 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:05 am

The WGC is a truce in name only. The reality is it is a surrender. The empire gave the Thalmor everything they asked for, and that is the definition of loser. The WGC makes the Thalmor stronger every day it is in effect. It allows the thalmor to travel freely in skyrim (and presumably cyrodiil and high rock), it allows them to buy off the Jarls (even Balgruuf took the chests of gold) and the wealth class, and it allows the Thalmor to demand Tullius turn over any prisoner they want - to be tortured into confession. The WGC does not allow the empire to rebuild so much as it allows the Thalmor to infiltrate and dominate. So therefore the WGC is not a path to a stronger empire. It is a path to further weakening of the empire and ascendance of Thalmor.
User avatar
Elina
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:09 pm

Post » Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:07 pm

A lot fo the jarls supported Ulfric. Even Balgruuf wouldn't let the Empire garrison troops in Whiterun. There are no Imperial troops in that City.

Ulfric should have called for the moot before warring with his fellow jarls. Instead of calling for a moot, Ulfric says this when you first come across him in Windhelm:

Spoiler

Ulfric: You think I need to send Balgruuf a stronger message.
Galmar: If by message you mean shoving a sword through his gullet.
Ulfric: Taking his city and leaving him in disgrace would make a more powerful statement, dont you think?
Galmar: So we're ready to start this war in earnest then?
Ulfric: Soon.
Galmar: I still say you should take them all out like you did Deadking Torygg.
Ulfric: Torygg was merely a message to the other Jarls. Whoever we replace them with will need the support of our armies.

That is not the way to become the legitimate king of Skyrim. He should have called for a moot.

They already attempted to call the moot. The empire interrupted it.

It won't convene now until the war is over.

Moots for contesting leadership can only be called upon the death of the high king. Whether by natural causes, or via the duel.
User avatar
Hussnein Amin
 
Posts: 3557
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:15 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:39 am

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

But the thrall of my enemy is my enemy.
User avatar
:)Colleenn
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:03 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim