They could easily test the mods, make them compatible, and sell them for Ms points, easy peasy, people would pay, i know i would, oh no, 3 dollars here, 5 dollars there, better than handing out 5 thousand dollars for a gaming computer, and having to uprade it every 3 months. and by the way, this game was developed for the 360 / ps3, and ported to the PC, so im pretty sure they could deliver these mods NO problem, pc users are so dense somtimes.
Uhh, how about no, id rather have a game which is tested thoroughly and not have to spend 4 thousand dollars on a good gaming pc every 6 months. Console is for real games, much more gaming variety, PC is for people that replace their lives with games. I can buy a used car for the price of a gaming pc, hell, I could buy a lot more practical stuff than agamng pc with 4 - 6 thousand dollars.
Which is it? 4 thousand? 5 thousand? 6 thousand? And what about duration? 3 months or 6. Make up your mind here fella, before you make a post. You seem to have the mindset that just because a new video card arrives, we PC gamers have to rush out and buy it. That's simply not true. Just because you have to have the next gen gaming console, because that's what you're given, doesn't mean we are required to update/upgrade our systems every three(six?) months. I've been rockin' a Core i7, 6 Gigs of Ram and a 295 GTX for the better part of two years now, and it's not slowing down.
Wait, a tested game? But so far, all the issues I've seen that are completely game-breaking are primarily on the PS3. The 90 hour mark I believe? How is that "tested thoroughly" when the PC doesn't seem to have that issue by comparison?
The reason it was made for 360/PS3 and then ported to PC was to make more money on the game. However, getting these Mods to console won't make them a dime, and it's not cost effective to test them all out just so a few of you will spend your allowance to get that horse armor you've been pining for. Honestly, this whole argument is lame though, because a game for Xbox is the same game for PC. How are consoles for "real gaming" again when you can play the same game cross-platform? What's the difference? You use a controller? I can do that too, as a PC gamer.
Mods. Most of them are crap, or aren't even implemented well. Occasionally you get that diamond in the rough, and it's something incredible and worth testing, uninstalling and reinstalling just to get it right. How can you do that on a console? How can you move files to their proper directory?
Regardless, if the men who make the money say no, then it's a no. Even from a technical standpoint, if it can be done, the money makers apparently have said no, and that's the answer. Does it svck? Yes. Do I understand why? Absolutely. Either way, in the end it's up to the guy who stays up in the penthouse suite and plays putt-putt all day long.
This is not a what's better than what debate either. I'm not a PC elitist, I prefer it. I prefer it because I can use Mods. I prefer it because I can multitask with it. And in no way am I bagging yours or anyone else's preference either, but I am bagging your "facts" with a little correction here.
So maybe use that money that you saved on getting a PC and getting something practical, like you said. I suggest getting a clue.
Well the good news is, thanks to consoles, the game industry moves forward so slowly to remain within the confines of what the current console generation can do that you can buy a $600-800 PC and have it last you for 4-6 years or so, as long as all you are using it for is gaming (most games anyway, you still see folks like Dice that will push the envelope once in a while). The video game industry is so far behind the PC hardware industry that there is no reason to bother keeping up with current hardware standards.
This guy gets it.