» Thu Jun 14, 2012 6:25 pm
This whole idea that Ulfric is a racist is so...so...sophomoric and has been debunked so many times I get the impression that it's more like a bunch of three year-olds running around trumpeting the newest potty word they've just learned.
In the first place, if you went, in a fit of politically correct, missionary zeal, to preach to Ulfric and Tullius and...well, heck, anyone in Skyrim...about "racism," they'd first look at you like you were talking a foreign language and then they'd laugh you back to where-ever you came from. (laughter is the most powerful shout).
the concept doesn't even exist in the social and cultural context of Skyrim.
Second, let me stipulate that I have not finished the game, nor have I chosen sides yet. And I am admittedly not the kind of pedant that quotes chapter and verse from obscure lore.
But I have yet to see a writ, a law, an edict, a statute or even a suggestion cited that overtly restricts the movement or rights of other races in Skyrim or Windhelm, which Ulfric supports. Much less one that directly seeks to actively persecute, enslave, restrict religious freedom or even badger Dunmer or Argonians.
I would welcome such citations.
The fact that the Dunmer live in a separate quarter in Windhelm is not one of those, however. AFAIK, Ulfric is indifferent to where the Dunmer live or how they make a living (there is even a Dunmer farming just outside of the city with a Nord employee...it is inconceivable that Ulfric doesn't know that). Ulfric has too much else on his plate, and too few resources to be bothered with such entrenched, millennia old trivialities.
You may have "other" issues with Ulfric...perhaps preferring collusion with a foreign power that ultimately seeks to wipe out all men on Tamriel; preferring a weak and corrupt thrall state to a strong "authority figure". But using "racism" as a reason is simply not supported by the evidence...nor rational.
In the end, I suspect it is a bit of a "cover."